[gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

[Gomes, Chuck]

I am fine with that Ron if it doesn't cause too much delay.

Chuck

From: Ron Andruff [mailto:ra at dotsportllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 11:15 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Larisa B. Gurnick'; gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Cc: 'Richard G A Westlake'
Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

Dear Chuck and all,

Yes, but... ...you make a good point that we are not delving into Working Groups at all when, in point of fact, the changes made during the last GNSO review moved us to the Working Group model.  For my part, I think it would be prudent to have at least one question on the effectiveness of WGs and perhaps another to flesh out the community's overall view of them.  Let's do our best to address this key aspect.  Thanks for bringing it forward Chuck.

Kind regards,

RA

Ron Andruff
dotSport LLC
www.lifedotsport.com<http://www.lifedotsport.com>

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org]> On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 19:05
To: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org>
Cc: Richard G A Westlake
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

I just completed the survey in a little over 30 minutes.  I answered questions for the GNSO Council and the RySG but I did not respond the last three open ended questions.

I think the assessment is looking very good.  Because working groups are such an important part of the GNSO, I think it is unfortunate that there are no questions about them.  At the same time I also am not in favor of trying to accomplish too much in one survey so I am not advocating that we add more questions at this time.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 6:50 PM
To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org>
Cc: Richard G A Westlake
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised

Dear All,
The Westlake Governance team modified the 360 Assessment based on feedback received last week.  The revised 360 Assessment is available here<https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSO360ReviewUATv3>.  Please provide your final feedback and any additional comments from your constituencies  by  August 1, 23:59 UTC.

The responder now has the option of skipping the detailed questions pertaining to the GNSO Council, Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies.  A responder who is directly involved or is a close observer in any of these groups, will be able to answer detailed questions for as many groups as he/she would like.

The introductory language will be further refined to provide a clear roadmap of the different sections of the Assessment and the options available to the responder.

Please note that staff is in the process of completing a detailed proofing and editing to ensure proper spelling, capitalization, definition of acronyms, etc.

Thank you for your feedback and commitment to making this assessment useful and informative.

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
larisa.gurnick at icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
310 383-8995

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140731/c127f1a1/attachment.html>