[gnso-review-dt] FW: GNSO review

[Gomes, Chuck]

The voting isn't complicated to me. The thresholds are. 

Chuck


----- Original Message -----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 05:41 PM
Cc: gnso-review-dt at icann.org <gnso-review-dt at icann.org>; 'BRG' <philip at brandregistrygroup.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] FW: GNSO review




On 12-Jun-14 20:24, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> [Chuck Gomes] As I explained in the history lesson above, registry
> and registrar representative votes counted double.

and they still do, though it is not structural as opposed to count by twos.

that did not change it was just turned into a euphemism. A very
complicated one with voting charts and tables.

avri