[gnso-review-dt] RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting

Tue May 6 16:27:51 UTC 2014

Thanks Larisa and Avri for comments.  I incorporated your comments and attach a revised version for reference.  Of course, please let me know if you propose other revisions or additions.  I look forward to the webinar tomorrow and discussion with the Council on Thursday.   Thanks - have a great afternoon!

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
Co-Managing Partner, Wolfe Sadler Breen Morasch & Colby, intellectual property law, INTL Trademark Law Firm of the Year 2013

513.746.2801
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011, 2012 & 2013
Follow Me: [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png at 01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe>  [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image002.png at 01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0] <http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/>  [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image003.png at 01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0] <https://twitter.com/jenwolfe>
Follow My Blog<http://www.jenwolfe.com/blog>
Domain Names Rewired<http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Names-Rewired-Strategies-Protection/dp/1118312627>

From: Larisa B. Gurnick [mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:06 PM
To: Jen Wolfe; Marika Konings; gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Cc: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com)
Subject: RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting

Jen,
Thank you for the productive meeting and the outline.  I propose several edits in the spirit of clarity and consistency of terminology.

The SIC is planning a 360 review to be facilitated by an independent auditor. This will seek input from the community on a variety of topics.

*         I would use "360 Assessment" rather than "360 Review" and "examiner" rather than "auditor".

*         The independent examiner will not be facilitating the 360 Assessment - they will use the data collected via the 360 as one of the key data points for the review.

*         As one of the components of the overall GNSO Review, the 360 Assessment is envisioned as an online tool that will collect feedback from the GNSO community, other ICANN structures and community members, the Board and staff.  The 360 Assessment questions will be developed based on criteria that will be used for the overall GNSO Review.  The proposed scope for the GNSO Review Working Party includes it providing  feedback on review criteria and the 360 Assessment.

Thank you,

Larisa

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
larisa.gurnick at icann.org<mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org>
310 383-8995

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 6:44 AM
To: Marika Konings; gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org>
Cc: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com<mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>)
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting

Hi everyone,

Thank you so much for your time on the call today.  In follow up to our discussion, I have briefly outlined the update we discussed providing to Council on Thursday, questions to pose to Council and our agreed upon time frame and next steps (attached).

In the interest of time, if you could please let me know any changes or revisions to this summary prior to the meeting on Thursday, I would really appreciate it.

Marika, if you don't mind sending out the request for a Doodle Poll, we can get our weekly meetings scheduled.  I also have a bit of an overlap with another board meeting on Thursday so I may not be able to be on the entire call, but will plan to jump on to lead this discussion on the Review.  I will have open Adobe Connect, but Marika, if you could email me when we are about 10 minutes out from the Review discussion, I would be most grateful.  The internet does allow us to be in two places at once - doesn't it? :)

Thanks again everyone for your time and I look forward to working with you!

With kindest regards,

Jen

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB
Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm
Co-Managing Partner, Wolfe Sadler Breen Morasch & Colby, intellectual property law, INTL Trademark Law Firm of the Year 2013

513.746.2801
IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011, 2012 & 2013
Follow Me: [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png at 01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe>  [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image002.png at 01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0] <http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/>  [Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image003.png at 01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0] <https://twitter.com/jenwolfe>
Follow My Blog<http://www.jenwolfe.com/blog>
Domain Names Rewired<http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Names-Rewired-Strategies-Protection/dp/1118312627>

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 10:17 AM
To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org<mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the GNSO Review Committee meeting tomorrow as well as some related documents attached for your review.

Best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda - GNSO Review Committee Meeting - 6 May 2014

*         Scope of Work for the committee

*         Developing a self-review to run in tandem with the SIC Review

*         Size & composition of the committee

o   Transparency

o   Brand Registry Group interest in the Review

o   Other group interests in the review

*         Frequency of Meetings

*         Webinar Preparation

*         Next Steps

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140506/1c23f522/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 386 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140506/1c23f522/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140506/1c23f522/image002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 386 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140506/1c23f522/image003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review Update.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 76602 bytes
Desc: GNSO Review Update.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140506/1c23f522/GNSOReviewUpdate.docx>