[gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party have completed the 360 survey

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Colin.  I think that explains why the CSG does not equal to the sum CBUC + IPC + ISP.  In the future it would be helpful if we asked respondents to identify what SGs and constituencies they were members of so we do not have estimate that from their answers.  Maybe we could do that on the WG survey.

Chuck

From: Colin Jackson [mailto:colin at westlakegovernance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:49 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Only 7 of 20 members of this Working Party have completed the 360 survey

Chuck

To answer your question:

Do the purple bars in the first chart represent the total completed as of 16 September or just those completed since last tabulated?

It is hard to tell without seeing the numbers, but looking at the CSG bars and comparing them to the three constituencies that make up the CSG, the chart does not look correct.  If the bars for the BC, IPC and ISPs are added, it appears that the bars for the CSG should be much higher.  Am I misinterpreting something here?

[cid:image001.png at 01CFD298.5A6C1B50]
The bars represent the total completed questionnaires in each category as at the date in question, which is 16 Sep for the purple ones. The underlying spreadsheet looks like this:


[cid:image003.jpg at 01CFD298.5A6C1B50]

I count a questionnaire as completed if the respondent has got as far as Qs11-13, which is the last page of general questions that are mandatory to answer. I count it under the GNSO Council if the respondent had answered the questions on that page (mostly mandatory if you enter the page at all). I treat the constituencies and stakeholder groups in the same way. Please note constituency numbers are not consolidated into the stakeholder groups; numbers for each SG represent people who were asked to answer questions about the SG specifically, knowing that they would have a separate opportunity to comment on constituencies.

I hope this clarifies!

Kind regards

Colin




Colin Jackson

colin at westlakegovernance.com<mailto:colin at westlakegovernance.com>
+64 21 393 685
skype:colinjackson


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140917/4f0c3c51/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 66202 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140917/4f0c3c51/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18471 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20140917/4f0c3c51/image003.jpg>