From charla.shambley at icann.org  Tue Dec  1 18:57:36 2015
From: charla.shambley at icann.org (Charla Shambley)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:57:36 +0000
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Respond to New Doodle Poll
Message-ID: <dd8040f8d230438ea2403fb28ff46e1b@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Unfortunately I was not able to schedule a call this week due to scheduling conflicts.  I have set up a new doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/82wsc4csrxhi8i8a> for a call next week.  Please click on the link by close of business this Thursday, 3 December, to provide your availability.

Regards,

Charla

From: Charla Shambley
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 2:35 PM
To: 'gnso-review-dt at icann.org' <gnso-review-dt at icann.org>
Subject: GNSO Review - Next Steps

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Thank you for the productive call last week to finish categorizing the remaining recommendations from the Final Report.  I am attaching the Excel spreadsheet which now sorts the recommendations according to the color coding scheme and then by "Ease of Implementation".  The objective of your next call is to determine prioritization of the recommendations and preparation of a Working Party  report to the GNSO Council and ultimately the Organizational Effectiveness Committee with suggestions on how to proceed with the 36 recommendations issued by the independent examiner. Please complete the doodle poll so that we can schedule a one hour call during the week of 30 November - I will close this poll on Friday, 27 November.

You will notice that there are three outstanding recommendations that the Working Party flagged during our last call which require further discussion and review of the Final Report.  I have highlighted relevant sections from the Final Report that support these three recommendations and have attached these two documents as well:

                Section 6 - recommendations 21 and 22
                Section 9 - recommendation 36

WP ACTION ITEM: Complete the doodle poll by 27 November.

Regards,

Charla

Charla K. Shambley
Strategic Initiatives Program Manager
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA  90094
310-745-1943

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151201/be7f0e65/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review Survey Analysis (17 Nov).xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 116354 bytes
Desc: GNSO Review Survey Analysis (17 Nov).xlsx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151201/be7f0e65/GNSOReviewSurveyAnalysis17Nov.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review Final Report - Section 6.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 165363 bytes
Desc: GNSO Review Final Report - Section 6.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151201/be7f0e65/GNSOReviewFinalReport-Section6.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review Final Report - Section 9.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 162235 bytes
Desc: GNSO Review Final Report - Section 9.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151201/be7f0e65/GNSOReviewFinalReport-Section9.pdf>

From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org  Wed Dec  9 06:52:02 2015
From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:52:02 +0000
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Attendance list  GNSO Review WP 18 November 2015 at 15:00 UTC
Message-ID: <D28CE776.AD7C0%nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>

Dear all,
Please find attendance and AC Chat below for the GNSO Review WP call held on Tuesday, 08 December 2015 at 18:00 UTC. The mp3 will be sent later today as we have had technical issues with the download. Apologies for the inconvenience. The transcription will be posted to the GNSO Master Calendar shortly.
MP3: Provided shortly.
Attendance:
Avri Doria
Chuck Gomes
Jen Wolfe
Rudi Vansnick
Amr Elsadr
David Maher
Pamela Smith
Stephanie Perrin

Apologies: Klaus Stoll

Staff:
Larisa Gurnick,
Marika Konings
Mary Wong
Lars Hoffmann
Glen de St Gery
Charla Shambley
Nathalie Peregrine

Thanks!
Nathalie

AC Chat:

Nathalie  Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the 8 December 2015
  Chuck Gomes:Where's our leader?
  Charla Shambley:Hi Chuck -- I just sent Jen an email.
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks Charla.
  Mary Wong:Please remember to mute your mics if you are not speaking, thank you!
  Nathalie  Peregrine:We are looking for the beeping line
  Rudi Vansnick:Klaus Stoll will not be able to join, he has to go seeing the doctor
  Nathalie  Peregrine:thanks Rudi, noted
  Amr Elsadr:Apologies. I think that was my line beeping.
  Chuck Gomes:While we are waiting for Jen, would it be helpful to review the remaining recommendations?
  Stephanie Perrin:sounds good
  Amr Elsadr:Fine by me.
  Jen Wolfe:My apologies, I did not get the email with the meeting time.
  Nathalie  Peregrine:Avri Doria ha sjoined the ca;l
  Nathalie  Peregrine:call
  Avri Doria:apologies, was in another meeting that went long.
  Nathalie  Peregrine:@ Jen, I will organise a few test emails so we can sort out your calendar invite issues
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: +1
  Rudi Vansnick:agree with Stefanie
  Amr Elsadr:Red sounds good to me on this one.
  Rudi Vansnick:i thought some of the recommendations in 21 are covered by the data metrix program running now
  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Yes, you may be right. I was fine with those recommendations from the DMPM WG. This one seems confusing. :)
  Rudi Vansnick:but that also seems to be an ongoing process
  Rudi Vansnick:is part of the newcomers support and training efforts already discussed earlier if i'm not wrong
  Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: Yes..., one would expect this, but you never know.
  Amr Elsadr:There are some lightweight orientation efforts to GNSO WG newcomers. Something similar for incoming councillors may not be such a bad thing.
  Stephanie Perrin:not hearing anything?
  Stephanie Perrin:yes and the ICANN academy could take on the role to point people to relevant training
  Amr Elsadr:Yellow would be OK if we really do agree with their intent. :)
  Amr Elsadr:I'm not entirely sure that we do.
  Stephanie Perrin:yes
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks.
  Rudi Vansnick:i did not find directly the element "technical" in the text itself
  Marika Konings:Chuck is correct - it should be also noted that even after the first meeting, new volunteers typically come in. The Chair(s) in consultation with staff will usually check to make sure that there is sufficient representation from the different parts of the ICANN community.
  Amr Elsadr:If I recall correctly, there are procedures that may allow the council to terminate a PDP prematurely for specific reasons. Adding these standards to a similar practice would be challenging.
  Marika Konings:both at the start of the WG, but also for WG meetings (it wouldn't be the first time that calls are cancelled because of lack of representation or the chair(s) go back to the Council to encourage additional volunteers.
  Rudi Vansnick:looking into the present participation in this WG we already see it is difficult to get everyone on it all the time
  Rudi Vansnick:should be part of the charter of each PDP WG
  Amr Elsadr:@Marika: Yes..., very true.
  Rudi Vansnick:correct Stephanie
  Rudi Vansnick:we know participation from Africa, due to connectivity issues , is problematic
  Stephanie Perrin:agree, turn this rec into a review checkpoint would solve it.
  Chuck Gomes:+1 Stephanie
  Amr Elsadr:Are we also sending something to the GNSO Council?
  Rudi Vansnick:good question Amr
  Rudi Vansnick:i would suggest yes
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: OK. Thanks.
  Rudi Vansnick:@Chuck +1
  Amr Elsadr:Isn't January when the Council will need to look at the CCWG recs as well?
  Stephanie Perrin:+1 Chuck!
  Larisa Gurnick:@Chuck, re: prioritization - OEC and the rest of the Board would be interested in hearing your thoughts on prioritization and work load.
  Stephanie Perrin:And in terms of the Westlake review, I would have expected the independent examiner to have prioritized better if they are giving us 36 recommendations
  Marika Konings:The Council tentatively has two meetings in January, so maybe there is some room ;-)
  Amr Elsadr:Fantastic. :)
  Stephanie Perrin::-)  reading my mind Amr
  Amr Elsadr:Won't some of the recommendations we yellowed become green after we make modifications to them?
  Mary Wong:Thanks Jen!
  Amr Elsadr:I would say before the holidays.
  Amr Elsadr:We don't have much time, do we?
  Amr Elsadr:Sound advice Chuck. :)
  Stephanie Perrin:Totally agree with Chuck, wedging this in right now is going to be tough.  As far as staff is concerned, will they not be getting a new CEO soon as well?
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.
  Stephanie Perrin:Happy holidays to all if we don't talk before January!
  Rudi Vansnick:bye
  Larisa Gurnick:Thank you all very much for participating
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks all.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151209/42d10ee2/attachment.html>

From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org  Thu Dec 10 14:21:18 2015
From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:21:18 +0000
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] With mp3 recording Attendance list  GNSO Review WP 18 November 2015
 at 15:00 UTC
Message-ID: <D28F3C52.AE21E%nathalie.peregrine@icann.org>

With mp3 recording, apologies for the delay, the initial recording was inaudible and therefore needed to be sent back to the provider.

Thank you,

Nathalie



Dear all,
Please find attendance and AC Chat below for the GNSO Review WP call held on Tuesday, 08 December 2015 at 18:00 UTC.

MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-08dec15-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXzI03ZqpsuIPMrJLavZcxKnliTuhjEioyx7JGnv59ObMqdcCdZJsA-3D-3D_QuA5zZR9ZZ7J1F2FeF-2FOsgm1hgIDcBrAX2P7Ezxmql7ckJc4ios1-2BxObAoz2rzLSI3c4QB1NGo7bw7XrBjpRCbz74w4vzk48UxZMFoBBQBQaQ0ePdiOjdJ30sQNHkokOf-2F2p-2FBvMgKvMhzp-2B4u8fP-2BRrSytHe2KCf2HpQmtSbpezMgNTUG57PiORAPesOotpHA-2BC4pSmXJRsVmpbNaLqztSO-2FNDWKp-2B6Eqj9WBWzFj7Ql9ClZDhyWFIq78zUWHZ2bkpMzYKbWWZdjYpIlI6J2AH8ExQSJ8gI-2BC6DnfxfivfaOsoOngWUqPCCDvYLGtvUdxTZ8YLoG3t2H3JMk4cjVXJQSR3DQBnTiu-2F2tGXbZsUtyCCDGqTq-2Bk60GZxODAvlvxlLiiGxuQoiSdYy53WJqf1KRgDS80E5v-2FXmRKYi8G-2Bc2Mj8OG9XHNbO-2FH5D5lP8pDqfoTq5hqWdjpz95b181jyBaH-2FUVb-2BMp-2FMjjq1SV-2FPgvr9oTa2t5r5TcfutMOfl>
Attendance:
Avri Doria
Chuck Gomes
Jen Wolfe
Rudi Vansnick
Amr Elsadr
David Maher
Pamela Smith
Stephanie Perrin

Apologies: Klaus Stoll

Staff:
Larisa Gurnick,
Marika Konings
Mary Wong
Lars Hoffmann
Glen de St Gery
Charla Shambley
Nathalie Peregrine

Thanks!
Nathalie

AC Chat:

Nathalie  Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the 8 December 2015
  Chuck Gomes:Where's our leader?
  Charla Shambley:Hi Chuck -- I just sent Jen an email.
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks Charla.
  Mary Wong:Please remember to mute your mics if you are not speaking, thank you!
  Nathalie  Peregrine:We are looking for the beeping line
  Rudi Vansnick:Klaus Stoll will not be able to join, he has to go seeing the doctor
  Nathalie  Peregrine:thanks Rudi, noted
  Amr Elsadr:Apologies. I think that was my line beeping.
  Chuck Gomes:While we are waiting for Jen, would it be helpful to review the remaining recommendations?
  Stephanie Perrin:sounds good
  Amr Elsadr:Fine by me.
  Jen Wolfe:My apologies, I did not get the email with the meeting time.
  Nathalie  Peregrine:Avri Doria ha sjoined the ca;l
  Nathalie  Peregrine:call
  Avri Doria:apologies, was in another meeting that went long.
  Nathalie  Peregrine:@ Jen, I will organise a few test emails so we can sort out your calendar invite issues
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: +1
  Rudi Vansnick:agree with Stefanie
  Amr Elsadr:Red sounds good to me on this one.
  Rudi Vansnick:i thought some of the recommendations in 21 are covered by the data metrix program running now
  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Yes, you may be right. I was fine with those recommendations from the DMPM WG. This one seems confusing. :)
  Rudi Vansnick:but that also seems to be an ongoing process
  Rudi Vansnick:is part of the newcomers support and training efforts already discussed earlier if i'm not wrong
  Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: Yes..., one would expect this, but you never know.
  Amr Elsadr:There are some lightweight orientation efforts to GNSO WG newcomers. Something similar for incoming councillors may not be such a bad thing.
  Stephanie Perrin:not hearing anything?
  Stephanie Perrin:yes and the ICANN academy could take on the role to point people to relevant training
  Amr Elsadr:Yellow would be OK if we really do agree with their intent. :)
  Amr Elsadr:I'm not entirely sure that we do.
  Stephanie Perrin:yes
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks.
  Rudi Vansnick:i did not find directly the element "technical" in the text itself
  Marika Konings:Chuck is correct - it should be also noted that even after the first meeting, new volunteers typically come in. The Chair(s) in consultation with staff will usually check to make sure that there is sufficient representation from the different parts of the ICANN community.
  Amr Elsadr:If I recall correctly, there are procedures that may allow the council to terminate a PDP prematurely for specific reasons. Adding these standards to a similar practice would be challenging.
  Marika Konings:both at the start of the WG, but also for WG meetings (it wouldn't be the first time that calls are cancelled because of lack of representation or the chair(s) go back to the Council to encourage additional volunteers.
  Rudi Vansnick:looking into the present participation in this WG we already see it is difficult to get everyone on it all the time
  Rudi Vansnick:should be part of the charter of each PDP WG
  Amr Elsadr:@Marika: Yes..., very true.
  Rudi Vansnick:correct Stephanie
  Rudi Vansnick:we know participation from Africa, due to connectivity issues , is problematic
  Stephanie Perrin:agree, turn this rec into a review checkpoint would solve it.
  Chuck Gomes:+1 Stephanie
  Amr Elsadr:Are we also sending something to the GNSO Council?
  Rudi Vansnick:good question Amr
  Rudi Vansnick:i would suggest yes
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: OK. Thanks.
  Rudi Vansnick:@Chuck +1
  Amr Elsadr:Isn't January when the Council will need to look at the CCWG recs as well?
  Stephanie Perrin:+1 Chuck!
  Larisa Gurnick:@Chuck, re: prioritization - OEC and the rest of the Board would be interested in hearing your thoughts on prioritization and work load.
  Stephanie Perrin:And in terms of the Westlake review, I would have expected the independent examiner to have prioritized better if they are giving us 36 recommendations
  Marika Konings:The Council tentatively has two meetings in January, so maybe there is some room ;-)
  Amr Elsadr:Fantastic. :)
  Stephanie Perrin::-)  reading my mind Amr
  Amr Elsadr:Won't some of the recommendations we yellowed become green after we make modifications to them?
  Mary Wong:Thanks Jen!
  Amr Elsadr:I would say before the holidays.
  Amr Elsadr:We don't have much time, do we?
  Amr Elsadr:Sound advice Chuck. :)
  Stephanie Perrin:Totally agree with Chuck, wedging this in right now is going to be tough.  As far as staff is concerned, will they not be getting a new CEO soon as well?
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.
  Stephanie Perrin:Happy holidays to all if we don't talk before January!
  Rudi Vansnick:bye
  Larisa Gurnick:Thank you all very much for participating
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks all.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151210/e3806121/attachment.html>

From Glen at icann.org  Tue Dec 15 23:02:11 2015
From: Glen at icann.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Glen_de_Saint_G=E9ry?=)
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 23:02:11 +0000
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Feedback needed: GNSO Review Working Party 
In-Reply-To: <00b401d13780$e669ccd0$b33d6670$@btinternet.com>
References: <e0e9b135dab9469084e5b44d8aa1ef33@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>
 <00b401d13780$e669ccd0$b33d6670$@btinternet.com>
Message-ID: <50f988af08a5407885e71048994d070d@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>

Dear Tony,

Thank you very much for this information.
Kind regards,

Glen

De : Tony Holmes [mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com]
Envoy? : mardi 15 d?cembre 2015 22:38
? : Glen de Saint G?ry; 'WUKnoben'
Cc : Chantelle Doerksen
Objet : RE: Feedback needed: GNSO Review Working Party

Dear Glen

     *   Osvaldo Novoa <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Osvaldo+Novoa+SOI>
     *   Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Wolf-Ulrich+Knoben+SOI>
Will remain as the ISPCP reps.
Regards
Tony

From: Glen de Saint G?ry [mailto:Glen at icann.org]
Sent: 14 December 2015 22:08
To: tony holmes (tonyarholmes at btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>); WUKnoben (wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>)
Cc: Chantelle Doerksen; Glen de Saint G?ry
Subject: Feedback needed: GNSO Review Working Party


Dear GNSO Stakeholder Group/Constituency Leaders,

The GNSO Review Working Party has accomplished a great deal of valuable work over the past 19 months.   This group is now in the process of finalizing its feasibility assessment and prioritization of the 36 final recommendations issued by the independent examiners (see Final Report<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-15sep15-en.pdf>) and is planning to provide its conclusions to the GNSO Council in January and the Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC)  in February (see status of Feasibility Assessment and Prioritization<https://community.icann.org/x/SptYAw>).

Please confirm your representatives on the Working Party and let us know of any changes in the appointments at your earliest convenience - see listing below.  Please encourage your representatives to participate in the upcoming Working Party meetings to ensure that your group's feedback is considered and included in the report to the OEC.

Currently, the GNSO Review Working Party is comprised of the following:

  *   Business Constituency (up to two members):

     *   Ron Andruff<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Ron+Andruff+SOI>
     *   Stephane Van Gelder<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31165426>

  *   Internet Service and Connectivity Providers Constituency (up to two members):

     *   Osvaldo Novoa <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Osvaldo+Novoa+SOI>
     *   Wolf-Ulrich Knoben <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Wolf-Ulrich+Knoben+SOI>

  *   Intellectual Property Constituency (up to two members):

     *   Brian Winterfeldt<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Brian+Winterfeldt+SOI>
     *   Mike Rodenbaugh<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Mike+Rodenbaugh+SOI>

  *   Registry Stakeholder Group (up to three members):

     *   Bret Fausett <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Bret+Fausett+SOI>
     *   Chuck Gomes<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Chuck+Gomes+SOI>
     *   David Maher <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/David+Maher+SOI>

  *   Nominating Committee Appointees (up to two members):

     *   Thomas Rickert <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Thomas+Rickert+SOI>
     *   Jennifer Wolfe <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jennifer+Wolfe+SOI>

  *   Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (up to six members):

     *   Avri Doria <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Avri+Doria+SOI>
     *   Rafik Dammak<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Rafik+Dammak+SOI>
     *   Klaus Stoll <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Klaus+Stoll+SOI>
     *   Rudi Vansnick <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Rudi+Vansnick+SOI>
     *   Bill Drake<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/William+Drake+SOI>
     *   Stephanie Perrin<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Stephanie+Perrin+SOI>

  *   Registrar Stakeholder Group (up to three members):

o   Jennifer Standiford<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jennifer+Standiford+SOI>

o   Jeff Neuman<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Jeff+Neuman+SOI>

o   Michele Neylon<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Michele+Neylon+SOI>

o   James M.  Bladel<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/James+M.+Bladel+SOI> (observer)

  *   SO/AC Observers:

     *   No appointments at present

  *   Other:

     *   Philip Sheppard<https://community.icann.org/display/~philip.sheppard>

To date, the Working Party has held 23 working sessions (including sessions at 4 ICANN meetings), and provided updates to GNSO Council during 7 of their sessions.  Attendance by each represented Stakeholder Group and Constituency is available on the GNSO Review wiki<https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Working+Party+Meetings>.

On behalf of the Organizational Effectiveness Committee and ICANN staff, I thank you for your contributions  and for  making time for this important activity.

Wishing you a peaceful and happy holiday season,
Larisa

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Mobile: 1 310 383-8995
Skype: larisa.gurnick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151215/090f7d31/attachment.html>

From charla.shambley at icann.org  Thu Dec 24 19:56:31 2015
From: charla.shambley at icann.org (Charla Shambley)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 19:56:31 +0000
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document
Message-ID: <8552fa22938c47afa4ea2eda83d85057@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>

Dear GNSO Review Working Party:

I have set up a doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> for a one hour call mid-January.  Please complete this poll by 6 January so that I can have the call details sent out for your calendar.

In preparation for the call, attached you will find an updated Excel document that provides an initial score and ranks each of the recommendations based on the criteria we have been using (ease, cost, strategic direction alignment, impact on other groups/work, additional info, and priority).  During our next call, we will be able to easily re-sort them according to the Working Party's suggested prioritization.

Also, you will note that Jen provided language for the recommendations highlighted in yellow (see column D).  We can review and modify/refine the language, if necessary, on the call as well.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Happy holidays to everyone!

Charla

Charla K. Shambley
Strategic Initiatives Program Manager
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA  90094
310-745-1943

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151224/4c894170/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 24 Dec 2015.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 124882 bytes
Desc: GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 24 Dec 2015.xlsx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151224/4c894170/GNSOReviewRecPrioritization-24Dec2015.xlsx>

From cgomes at Verisign.com  Thu Dec 31 00:34:06 2015
From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck)
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:34:06 +0000
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document
In-Reply-To: <8552fa22938c47afa4ea2eda83d85057@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>
References: <8552fa22938c47afa4ea2eda83d85057@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG>
Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4A1A1ACC@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

Attached is a table that contains my personal comments, some suggestions and a few questions regarding our categorization of 15 of the Westlake recommendations with a particular emphasis on the priorities.  I request that we discuss these on our list in advance of our next meeting and hopefully that will facilitate finalization of the priorities in that meeting.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 2:57 PM
To: 'gnso-review-dt at icann.org'
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review: Doodle Poll and Revised Prioritization Document

Dear GNSO Review Working Party:

I have set up a doodle poll<http://doodle.com/poll/27e5twxchd93c92f> for a one hour call mid-January.  Please complete this poll by 6 January so that I can have the call details sent out for your calendar.

In preparation for the call, attached you will find an updated Excel document that provides an initial score and ranks each of the recommendations based on the criteria we have been using (ease, cost, strategic direction alignment, impact on other groups/work, additional info, and priority).  During our next call, we will be able to easily re-sort them according to the Working Party's suggested prioritization.

Also, you will note that Jen provided language for the recommendations highlighted in yellow (see column D).  We can review and modify/refine the language, if necessary, on the call as well.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Happy holidays to everyone!

Charla

Charla K. Shambley
Strategic Initiatives Program Manager
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA  90094
310-745-1943

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151231/8187af78/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Gomes Suggestions for GNSO Review Working Party Discussion 30 Dec 2015.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 23594 bytes
Desc: Gomes Suggestions for GNSO Review Working Party Discussion 30 Dec 2015.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151231/8187af78/GomesSuggestionsforGNSOReviewWorkingPartyDiscussion30Dec2015.docx>