From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Thu Jul 2 14:16:59 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:16:59 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review Working Party Public Comment on the Review Schedule In-Reply-To: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962418F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962418F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: Thank you all for your comments. With no objections, I will go ahead and submit this, incorporating Chuck's suggested changes. I look forward to talking with you all later this summer when we schedule calls to discuss implementation recommendations. Thanks and have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:12 PM To: Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Charla Shambley Subject: RE: GNSO Review Working Party Public Comment on the Review Schedule Very well written Jen. Thanks for doing this. I have no objections. Here's a very minor edit: Delete 'a' in the following in the last large paragraph: ". . . we expect a significant volunteer time to be invested into planning and implementing needed improvements. " Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:09 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Charla Shambley Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Public Comment on the Review Schedule Hello GNSO Review Working Party, I hope everyone had a safe trip back from Buenos Aires! During our meeting last we discussed the importance of the GNSO Review Working Party providing a response to the Public Comment on the Proposed Review Schedule and Process/Operational Improvements for AoC and Organizational Reviews. This public comment is due Thursday, July 2nd. Based upon our discussion, I have drafted a public comment related to the timing issues we all agreed upon as problematic to the process. I realize this is a very short turn-around time, but respectfully request any proposed changes or support in submitting the public comment. I focused the public comment on the importance of allowing community members sufficient time to respond to the Review process, so hopefully it is non-controversial. If I don't hear any objections, I will go ahead and submit this by the deadline on Thursday, July 2nd. If you do have an objection to the comment, please let me know. Of course, we certainly encourage all of your in your individual capacities to provide a comment if there are other concerns you would like to raise regarding the Review time frame and process. DRAFT COMMENT: On behalf of the GNSO Review Working Party, I appreciate the opportunity to submit this public comment regarding the schedule and process for Reviews mandated by the Affirmation of Commitments and the ICANN Bylaws. The GNSO Review began approximately one year ago following the ICANN 50 meeting in London. Since that time, the members of the GNSO Review Working Party have requested two extensions of time in order to allow for the necessary time to review, contemplate and provide thoughtful and meaningful feedback to ICANN staff and the independent examiner. As a result of these extensions of time, we were able to provide important feedback into the scope of the questions asked in the 360 survey and to provide additional time for announcements and outreach during the ICANN 51 Los Angeles meeting to encourage more participation. This allowed for more meaningful results from the community. We also requested an extension of time to review the initial draft report provided by the independent examiner. This extension gave members of the Working Party additional time to consider the voluminous information and track more than 120 comments to the report. This feedback was documented and responses were provided by the independent examiner. We believe this additional time allowed for a better outcome and end result. Accordingly, we urge you to consider allotting additional time for other Reviews and their respective Working Parties so that the time and consideration can be given to obtain quality results in the survey and interview process and quality feedback to the report produced by the independent examiner. Additionally, we ask you to consider the impact of scheduled reviews on the volunteer workload. Qualified, experienced and knowledgeable community members willing to dedicate focused and significant effort are an essential component of this important accountability mechanism functioning effectively. As the GNSO Review Working Party, our group of 20 volunteers has put in significant energy and time to help make the GNSO Review and recommendations useful and supportive of continuous improvement - 17 meetings and two rounds of nearly 120 comments leading up to the Draft Report. The broader community also contributed to the GNSO Review in important ways by offering their views and feedback - 178 people completed online surveys and 40 people participated in one on one interviews. As we begin planning for the implementation phase, we expect a significant volunteer time to be invested into planning and implementing needed improvements. We fully support this approach to conducting future Organizational Reviews and urge you to ensure that adequate time and volunteer resources are available not just to conduct each Review, but as importantly, to contribute to a productive implementation of Review recommendations and applying lessons learned to future reviews. I thank you for the opportunity to provide this public comment and share our experiences in the GNSO Review. The GNSO Review Working Party Thank you for your time and input! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From charla.shambley at icann.org Thu Jul 2 17:12:30 2015 From: charla.shambley at icann.org (Charla Shambley) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:12:30 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Message-ID: Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53! Following up to Larisa's email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to point out a few items: . Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations. See Initial Assessment of Recommendations . We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. . A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on 28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft recommendations. Please click on the link to provide your availability: Doodle Poll . I will close the poll by 8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar. . Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the summary of comments and responses from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability ". Please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5511 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Mon Jul 6 20:19:53 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 20:19:53 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962A9FF@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Charla, Before I enter comments in the Initial Assessment, I want to make sure I understand what is being requested. . Should we enter our opinion as to whether the recommendation should be 'accepted as is', 'accepted with modification', or 'rejected' along with our rationale? . Does it make sense to do this before the public comment ends and we have the comment summary? . Am I correct that it would be helpful if we rate the feasibility and usefulness of the recommendation? If so, how should we rate these two factors? A common scale for all of us would be helpful. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:12 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53! Following up to Larisa's email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to point out a few items: . Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations. See Initial Assessment of Recommendations . We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. . A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on 28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft recommendations. Please click on the link to provide your availability: Doodle Poll . I will close the poll by 8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar. . Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the summary of comments and responses from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability ". Please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5909 bytes Desc: not available URL: From larisa.gurnick at icann.org Mon Jul 6 21:32:12 2015 From: larisa.gurnick at icann.org (Larisa B. Gurnick) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 21:32:12 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires In-Reply-To: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962A9FF@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962A9FF@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: Chuck, Staff responses to your questions are included below. * Should we enter our opinion as to whether the recommendation should be 'accepted as is', 'accepted with modification', or 'rejected' along with our rationale? - The opinion of the GNSO Review Working Party members would be useful, given your knowledge and experience with the GNSO Review and the work of the GNSO. A basis or rationale might include: cost/benefit considerations, alignment with strategic direction of ICANN, aspects that are out of scope for the review, insufficient information about the finding or the recommendation, and potential impact on another group. * Does it make sense to do this before the public comment ends and we have the comment summary? - Yes, public comments will be summarized by staff and considered by Westlake, in addition to the feedback from the GNSO Review Working Party. Your opinion and feedback would provide Westlake with additional useful information to consider as they refine and finalize their report and recommendations. * Am I correct that it would be helpful if we rate the feasibility and usefulness of the recommendation? If so, how should we rate these two factors? A common scale for all of us would be helpful. - In forming your opinion as to whether the recommendation should be accepted, modified or rejected, you would be considering whether the recommendation is feasible and useful. A basis or rationale might include: cost/benefit considerations, alignment with strategic direction of ICANN, aspects that are out of scope for the review, insufficient information about the finding or the recommendation, and potential impact on another group. Best wishes, Larisa From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 1:20 PM To: Charla Shambley; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Charla, Before I enter comments in the Initial Assessment, I want to make sure I understand what is being requested. * Should we enter our opinion as to whether the recommendation should be 'accepted as is', 'accepted with modification', or 'rejected' along with our rationale? * Does it make sense to do this before the public comment ends and we have the comment summary? * Am I correct that it would be helpful if we rate the feasibility and usefulness of the recommendation? If so, how should we rate these two factors? A common scale for all of us would be helpful. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:12 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53! Following up to Larisa's email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to point out a few items: * Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations. See Initial Assessment of Recommendations. We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. * A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on 28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft recommendations. Please click on the link to provide your availability: Doodle Poll. I will close the poll by 8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar. * Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the summary of comments and responses from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability". Please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Mon Jul 6 23:06:29 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 23:06:29 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires In-Reply-To: References: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962A9FF@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962ABDD@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Thanks Larisa. That helps a lot. I will try to insert my responses this week. Chuck From: Larisa B. Gurnick [mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 5:32 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Charla Shambley; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Chuck, Staff responses to your questions are included below. * Should we enter our opinion as to whether the recommendation should be 'accepted as is', 'accepted with modification', or 'rejected' along with our rationale? - The opinion of the GNSO Review Working Party members would be useful, given your knowledge and experience with the GNSO Review and the work of the GNSO. A basis or rationale might include: cost/benefit considerations, alignment with strategic direction of ICANN, aspects that are out of scope for the review, insufficient information about the finding or the recommendation, and potential impact on another group. * Does it make sense to do this before the public comment ends and we have the comment summary? - Yes, public comments will be summarized by staff and considered by Westlake, in addition to the feedback from the GNSO Review Working Party. Your opinion and feedback would provide Westlake with additional useful information to consider as they refine and finalize their report and recommendations. * Am I correct that it would be helpful if we rate the feasibility and usefulness of the recommendation? If so, how should we rate these two factors? A common scale for all of us would be helpful. - In forming your opinion as to whether the recommendation should be accepted, modified or rejected, you would be considering whether the recommendation is feasible and useful. A basis or rationale might include: cost/benefit considerations, alignment with strategic direction of ICANN, aspects that are out of scope for the review, insufficient information about the finding or the recommendation, and potential impact on another group. Best wishes, Larisa From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 1:20 PM To: Charla Shambley; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Charla, Before I enter comments in the Initial Assessment, I want to make sure I understand what is being requested. * Should we enter our opinion as to whether the recommendation should be 'accepted as is', 'accepted with modification', or 'rejected' along with our rationale? * Does it make sense to do this before the public comment ends and we have the comment summary? * Am I correct that it would be helpful if we rate the feasibility and usefulness of the recommendation? If so, how should we rate these two factors? A common scale for all of us would be helpful. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:12 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53! Following up to Larisa's email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to point out a few items: * Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations. See Initial Assessment of Recommendations. We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. * A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on 28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft recommendations. Please click on the link to provide your availability: Doodle Poll. I will close the poll by 8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar. * Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the summary of comments and responses from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability". Please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Wed Jul 8 19:54:26 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:54:26 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4962D48D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Is it just me or is the Word version of the template very unfriendly? It worked fine the first time I used it and is okay when editing or adding already inserted comments but, for any items where comments were not previously inserted, the comment box won't open when I click to open it. Also, none of the typical Word functions such as redlining and formatting don't work in the Word template. The RySG is having a pretty good exercise to develop our comments but it involves multiple iterations of the template. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:12 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53! Following up to Larisa's email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to point out a few items: . Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations. See Initial Assessment of Recommendations . We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. . A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on 28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft recommendations. Please click on the link to provide your availability: Doodle Poll . I will close the poll by 8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar. . Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the summary of comments and responses from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability ". Please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5909 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Mon Jul 20 21:35:13 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:35:13 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49640B9F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> I assume late is better than never. I just entered my assessments and some comments to the recommendations. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 1:12 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: richard at westlakegovernance.com; Colin Jackson (colin at westlakegovernance.com); Vaughan Renner Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Wiki, Doodle Poll and Public Session in Buenos Aires Dear GNSO Review Working Party: I hope this email finds you well after ICANN53! Following up to Larisa's email which summarized your work in Buenos Aires and next steps, I wanted to point out a few items: . Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments from the Working Party and Staff on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations. See Initial Assessment of Recommendations . We have organized the recommendations by theme to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. . A doodle poll has been set up to schedule a Working Party call on 28, 29 or 30 July to consider community comments and prioritize draft recommendations. Please click on the link to provide your availability: Doodle Poll . I will close the poll by 8 July and send out an invitation for your calendar. . Relevant discussion for implementation planning - please see the summary of comments and responses from the 24 June public session "AoC and Organizational Reviews: Supporting ICANN Accountability ". Please let me know if you have any questions. Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5909 bytes Desc: not available URL: From charla.shambley at icann.org Wed Jul 22 18:06:28 2015 From: charla.shambley at icann.org (Charla Shambley) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 18:06:28 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Message-ID: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Dear GNSO Review WP, To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review . In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report , an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. GNSO Review WP Action Items . By 24 July: Encourage groups to provide feedback on the Public Comment. . By 29 July: Provide comments on the Initial Assessment of Recommendations Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.emz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 4440 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 6209 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5511 bytes Desc: not available URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Wed Jul 22 18:11:56 2015 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:11:56 -0400 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <55AFDCEC.7000704@mail.utoronto.ca> Maybe with all that is going on it would be a good idea to extend the deadline for another couple of weeks. Seems like a profound waste of time if noone comments.... cheers Stephanie PS folks are busy.... On 2015-07-22 14:06, Charla Shambley wrote: > > Dear GNSO Review WP, > > To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum > on the > open Public Comment > of > the Draft Report on the GNSO Review > . > In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on > the Draft Report > , > an announcement > was posted > last week that extends the Public Comment > period > through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to > submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 > are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of > public comment. > > I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several > wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of > the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report > > (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations > ). > The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide > with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its > own page (see Recommendation 1 > for > example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section > (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your > name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy > schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that > it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations > before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). > If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please > specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post > them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time > to provide your comments on the wiki. > > GNSO Review WP Action Items ? By 24 July: Encourage groups to provide > feedback on the Public Comment. ? By 29 July: Provide comments on the > Initial Assessment of Recommendations > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Regards, > > Charla > > Charla K. Shambley > > Strategic Initiatives Program Manager > > ICANN > > 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 > > Los Angeles, CA 90094 > > 310-578-8921 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 6209 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wjdrake at gmail.com Wed Jul 22 18:56:55 2015 From: wjdrake at gmail.com (William Drake) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:56:55 +0200 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <55AFDCEC.7000704@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <55AFDCEC.7000704@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Hi I agree with Stephanie. A lot of volunteers are really maxed out right now with time sensitive stuff so it is very difficult to get people focused on this, and without community engagement the level of buy in going forward would seem questionable. Bill > On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote: > > Maybe with all that is going on it would be a good idea to extend the deadline for another couple of weeks. Seems like a profound waste of time if noone comments.... > cheers Stephanie > PS folks are busy.... > > On 2015-07-22 14:06, Charla Shambley wrote: >> Dear GNSO Review WP, >> >> To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review . In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report , an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. >> >> I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations ). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions. >> >> Regards, >> >> Charla >> >> Charla K. Shambley >> Strategic Initiatives Program Manager >> ICANN >> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 >> Los Angeles, CA 90094 >> 310-578-8921 > > ********************************************************* William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q ********************************************************* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michele at blacknight.com Wed Jul 22 19:00:08 2015 From: michele at blacknight.com (Michele Neylon - Blacknight) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:00:08 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <55AFDCEC.7000704@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: It?s also that time of the year when a LOT of people are on holiday, or if they aren?t, are covering for people who are .. -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Random Stuff: http://www.michele.irish/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: > on behalf of William Drake Date: Wednesday 22 July 2015 19:56 To: Stephanie Perrin Cc: Charla Shambley, "gnso-review-dt at icann.org" Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Hi I agree with Stephanie. A lot of volunteers are really maxed out right now with time sensitive stuff so it is very difficult to get people focused on this, and without community engagement the level of buy in going forward would seem questionable. Bill On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Stephanie Perrin > wrote: Maybe with all that is going on it would be a good idea to extend the deadline for another couple of weeks. Seems like a profound waste of time if noone comments.... cheers Stephanie PS folks are busy.... On 2015-07-22 14:06, Charla Shambley wrote: Dear GNSO Review WP, To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review. In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report, an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 ********************************************************* William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q ********************************************************* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Wed Jul 22 19:01:33 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:01:33 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49643C9F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Note that the RySG will be submitting its comments tomorrow. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:06 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Dear GNSO Review WP, To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review . In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report , an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations ). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. GNSO Review WP Action Items . By 24 July: Encourage groups to provide feedback on the Public Comment. . By 29 July: Provide comments on the Initial Assessment of Recommendations Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.emz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 4440 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 2640 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5909 bytes Desc: not available URL: From onovoa at Antel.com.uy Wed Jul 22 19:04:42 2015 From: onovoa at Antel.com.uy (Novoa, Osvaldo) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 19:04:42 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <95555D8C70D007418DC72CCFF7C7FA427795CF8C@E2K10-MBX3.net.in.iantel.com.uy> The ISPCP will be submitting its comments next Friday. Best regards, [cid:656040419 at 22072015-2780]Osvaldo Novoa Subgerente General Antel Guatemala 1075, Nivel 22 Montevideo, 11800 Uruguay Tel. +598 2928 6400 Fax. +598 2928 6401 ________________________________ De: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] En nombre de Charla Shambley Enviado el: Mi?rcoles, 22 de Julio de 2015 15:06 Para: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Asunto: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Dear GNSO Review WP, To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review. In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report, an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. [GNSO Review WP Action Items ? By 24 July: Encourage groups to provide feedback on the Public Comment. ? By 29 July: Provide comments on the Initial Assessment of Recommendations] Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 6209 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LOGO A.bmp Type: image/bmp Size: 27702 bytes Desc: LOGO A.bmp URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Wed Jul 22 19:30:33 2015 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:30:33 -0400 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49643C9F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49643C9F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: <55AFEF59.8030600@mail.utoronto.ca> Spoiler! I thought we were on a roll there for an extension:-) Go ahead, make me work all night.... SP On 2015-07-22 15:01, Gomes, Chuck wrote: > > Note that the RySG will be submitting its comments tomorrow. > > Chuck > > *From:*owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Charla Shambley > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:06 PM > *To:* gnso-review-dt at icann.org > *Subject:* [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft > Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations > > Dear GNSO Review WP, > > To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum > on the > open Public Comment > of > the Draft Report on the GNSO Review > . > In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on > the Draft Report > , > an announcement > was posted > last week that extends the Public Comment > period > through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to > submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 > are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of > public comment. > > I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several > wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of > the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report > > (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations > ). > The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide > with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its > own page (see Recommendation 1 > for > example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section > (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your > name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy > schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that > it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations > before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). > If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please > specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post > them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time > to provide your comments on the wiki. > > GNSO Review WP Action Items ? By 24 July: Encourage groups to provide > feedback on the Public Comment. ? By 29 July: Provide comments on the > Initial Assessment of Recommendations > > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Regards, > > Charla > > Charla K. Shambley > > Strategic Initiatives Program Manager > > ICANN > > 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 > > Los Angeles, CA 90094 > > 310-578-8921 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 2640 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Wed Jul 22 20:12:39 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 20:12:39 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <55AFEF59.8030600@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49643C9F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <55AFEF59.8030600@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49643FCA@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Didn't mean to be a spoiler Stephanie. I have no problem with an extension but I don't think we should extend without some assurances that there are some who will respond if given more time. Chuck From: Stephanie Perrin [mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:31 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Charla Shambley; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] RE: GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Spoiler! I thought we were on a roll there for an extension :-) Go ahead, make me work all night.... SP On 2015-07-22 15:01, Gomes, Chuck wrote: Note that the RySG will be submitting its comments tomorrow. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Charla Shambley Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2:06 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Dear GNSO Review WP, To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review. In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report, an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the "Working Party" section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. [GNSO Review WP Action Items * By 24 July: Encourage groups to provide feedback on the Public Comment. * By 29 July: Provide comments on the Initial Assessment of Recommendations] Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 2640 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de Thu Jul 23 02:11:42 2015 From: wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de (WUKnoben) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 10:11:42 +0800 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <25BE48AB24964858A10F25CFE76F188C@WUKPC> Charla, the comment of the ISPCP constituency is in its last approval cycle and will be submitted on time. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Charla Shambley Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:06 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations Dear GNSO Review WP, To date, only one comment has been received via the comments forum on the open Public Comment of the Draft Report on the GNSO Review. In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback on the Draft Report, an announcement was posted last week that extends the Public Comment period through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as part of public comment. I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in their Draft Report (also see Initial Assessment of Recommendations). The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its own page (see Recommendation 1 for example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the wiki. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 6209 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kstubbs at afilias.info Thu Jul 23 02:29:10 2015 From: kstubbs at afilias.info (Ken Stubbs) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 22:29:10 -0400 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Public Comment on Draft Report & Working Party Comments to Recommendations In-Reply-To: References: <3d94d4c796b547c9addd4e5f761b990f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> <55AFDCEC.7000704@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <55B05176.1050903@afilias.info> +1 Ken Stubbs On 7/22/15 14:56, William Drake wrote: > Hi > > I agree with Stephanie. A lot of volunteers are really maxed out > right now with time sensitive stuff so it is very difficult to get > people focused on this, and without community engagement the level of > buy in going forward would seem questionable. > > Bill > >> On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Stephanie Perrin >> > > wrote: >> >> Maybe with all that is going on it would be a good idea to extend the >> deadline for another couple of weeks. Seems like a profound waste >> of time if noone comments.... >> cheers Stephanie >> PS folks are busy.... >> >> On 2015-07-22 14:06, Charla Shambley wrote: >>> Dear GNSO Review WP, >>> To date, only one comment has been received via thecomments forum >>> on the >>> openPublic Comment >>> of >>> theDraft Report on the GNSO Review >>> . >>> In order to allow the community additional time to provide feedback >>> on theDraft Report >>> , >>> anannouncement >>> was posted >>> last week that extends thePublic Comment >>> period >>> through 23:59 UTC on 24 July. I urge you to encourage your groups >>> to submit comments by Friday. Comments provided verbally during >>> ICANN53 are being catalogued and will be posted and considered as >>> part of public comment. >>> I wanted to remind the Working Party that Staff has set up several >>> wiki pages to capture comments on the feasibility and usefulness of >>> the 36 recommendations proposed by Westlake in theirDraft Report >>> (also >>> seeInitial Assessment of Recommendations >>> ). >>> The recommendations are organized by theme on the wiki to coincide >>> with the structure of the Draft Report. Each recommendation has its >>> own page (seeRecommendation 1 >>> for >>> example). Please add your comments in the ?Working Party? section >>> (you must be logged in to the wiki in order to do so) and include >>> your name or initials to your comments. Staff acknowledges your >>> busy schedule and extensive participation to date, however please >>> note that it would be helpful to capture your comments on the >>> recommendations before our call scheduled on 30 July @ 19:00 UTC >>> (agenda to follow). If you would rather send an email with your >>> comments to me, please specify which recommendation you are >>> commenting on and I will post them to the wiki on your behalf. >>> Chuck, thank you for taking the time to provide your comments on the >>> wiki. >>> >>> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions. >>> Regards, >>> Charla >>> Charla K. Shambley >>> Strategic Initiatives Program Manager >>> ICANN >>> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 >>> Los Angeles, CA 90094 >>> 310-578-8921 >> >> > > ********************************************************* > William J. Drake > International Fellow & Lecturer > Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ > University of Zurich, Switzerland > Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, > ICANN, www.ncuc.org > william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), > wjdrake at gmail.com (lists), > www.williamdrake.org > /Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap /http://goo.gl/sRR01q > ********************************************************* > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Fri Jul 24 12:38:53 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:38:53 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting Message-ID: Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: * Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July * Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July * In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. * 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. * During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. * A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Fri Jul 24 12:51:10 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:51:10 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E49653AD9@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Thanks Jen. I support proceeding with the call next week. There will be sufficient comments received by then to start our consideration of them. I am sure that it will require more than one call anyone so the sooner we get started the better. On a personal note, I will be less available to work on this from August 5th to 31st. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:39 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: * Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July * Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July * In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. * 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. * During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. * A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philip at brandregistrygroup.org Fri Jul 24 13:56:00 2015 From: philip at brandregistrygroup.org (BRG) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:56:00 +0200 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Jen, I will be unable to make a call on 30 July Philip _____ From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: 24 July 2015 14:39 To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: . Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July . Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July . In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. . 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. . During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. . A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lhc at yahoo-inc.com Fri Jul 24 14:52:00 2015 From: lhc at yahoo-inc.com (Laura Covington) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1616552148.1740182.1437749520378.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> BC comment should be in soon. ?Laura Covington VP, Intellectual Property Policy Yahoo! Inc. 701 First Avenue? Sunnyvale CA? 94089 ? From: Jen Wolfe To: "gnso-review-dt at icann.org" Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 5:38 AM Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting Hello GNSO Review Working Team: ? Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process.? As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments.? I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment ?have one more week to respond.? I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week?s deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August.? ? I have summarized the comments received to date below: ? Comments to date: ?????????????Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July ?????????????Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July ?????????????In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC ? all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July.? There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. ?????????????64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions ? seeposted table ? Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July ? total of 53 days. ????????? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in thepublic session on Reviews.? ????????? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake ? see theposted table. ? As one additional point:? we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation.??I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. ? I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. ? Thanks again for your continued support of this process!? Have a great weekend! ? Jen ? ? jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand?? :http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs?http://ow.ly/Eblgc ? Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column? http://ow.ly/EbljP ? Linked In Group:? gTLD Strategy for Brandshttp://ow.ly/EbloM ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be Fri Jul 24 15:22:41 2015 From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:22:41 +0200 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7F7B6BA5-F7D4-4527-B800-C5D1CF048101@isoc.be> NPOC works on comments to be posted, if possible before the actual deadline (today 23:59 UTC). Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > Op 24-jul.-2015, om 14:38 heeft Jen Wolfe het volgende geschreven: > > Hello GNSO Review Working Team: > > Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week?s deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. > > I have summarized the comments received to date below: > > Comments to date: > ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July > ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July > ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC ? all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. > ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions ? see posted table > > Public Comment/Engagement: > This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July ? total of 53 days. > ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. > ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake ? see the posted table. > > As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. > > I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. > > Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! > > Jen > > > JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB > FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM > 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 > IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 > What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P > Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc > Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP > Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de Sat Jul 25 01:25:21 2015 From: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de (Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:25:21 +0800 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Jen, I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone > Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe : > > Hello GNSO Review Working Team: > > Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week?s deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. > > I have summarized the comments received to date below: > > Comments to date: > ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July > ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July > ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC ? all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. > ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions ? see posted table > > Public Comment/Engagement: > This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July ? total of 53 days. > ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. > ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake ? see the posted table. > > As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. > > I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. > > Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! > > Jen > > > JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB > FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM > 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 > IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 > What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P > Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc > Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP > Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From onovoa at Antel.com.uy Sat Jul 25 03:35:23 2015 From: onovoa at Antel.com.uy (Novoa, Osvaldo) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 03:35:23 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: I am available for the 30th of July. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de" > escribi?: Thanks Jen, I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe >: Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week?s deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC ? all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions ? see posted table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July ? total of 53 days. ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake ? see the posted table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Tue Jul 28 16:59:38 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:59:38 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Thank you to everyone who has responded. Based upon the responses, I think we only have 3 people (including me) who can attend the call this Thursday, 30 July. If anyone else can attend, please let me know, but I'm concerned that without more attending the call, we will have to repeat much of the conversation when others can join and want to ensure we have sufficient feedback to move this initiative forward before the October Dublin meeting. Chuck and Osvlado, I so appreciate your availability, but also deeply respect your time and don't want you to feel like it is not productive because there are not enough groups represented on the call. I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more participation. I'm completely happy to still get on a call on Thursday if you all think that is going to be worthwhile, but also happy to send out a new Doodle poll to try to get more participation. Please let me know your comments and thoughts and we can plan accordingly. Thanks so much. For all of you heading on holiday - have a great one! Jen JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand?? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs? http://ow.ly/Eblgc ? Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column? http://ow.ly/EbljP ? Linked In Group:? gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -----Original Message----- From: Novoa, Osvaldo [mailto:onovoa at Antel.com.uy] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:35 PM To: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de Cc: Jen Wolfe ; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting I am available for the 30th of July. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de" > escribi?: Thanks Jen, I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe >: Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. From wjdrake at gmail.com Tue Jul 28 19:58:55 2015 From: wjdrake at gmail.com (William Drake) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:58:55 +0200 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <278A0B50-B14A-49B5-A2DD-863BC8AC5175@gmail.com> > On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Jen Wolfe wrote: > > I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more participation. Sounds right to me. Thanks Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rudi.vansnick at isoc.be Tue Jul 28 20:07:38 2015 From: rudi.vansnick at isoc.be (Rudi Vansnick) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:07:38 +0200 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Jennifer, I could make myself available, although it is in the middle of vacation period, I would also suggest to move the call to September. Do not forget the comment period was also extended till 31st July. Kind regards, Rudi Vansnick Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) www.npoc.org rudi.vansnick at npoc.org Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16 Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32 > Op 28-jul.-2015, om 18:59 heeft Jen Wolfe het volgende geschreven: > > > Thank you to everyone who has responded. Based upon the responses, I think we only have 3 people (including me) who can attend the call this Thursday, 30 July. If anyone else can attend, please let me know, but I'm concerned that without more attending the call, we will have to repeat much of the conversation when others can join and want to ensure we have sufficient feedback to move this initiative forward before the October Dublin meeting. Chuck and Osvlado, I so appreciate your availability, but also deeply respect your time and don't want you to feel like it is not productive because there are not enough groups represented on the call. > > I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more participation. I'm completely happy to still get on a call on Thursday if you all think that is going to be worthwhile, but also happy to send out a new Doodle poll to try to get more participation. > > Please let me know your comments and thoughts and we can plan accordingly. Thanks so much. For all of you heading on holiday - have a great one! > > Jen > > JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB > FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM > 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 > IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 > What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P > Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc > Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP > Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > > -----Original Message----- > From: Novoa, Osvaldo [mailto:onovoa at Antel.com.uy] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:35 PM > To: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de > Cc: Jen Wolfe ; gnso-review-dt at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting > > I am available for the 30th of July. > Best regards, > Osvaldo > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de" > escribi?: > > Thanks Jen, > I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. > > Wolf-Ulrich > > Sent from my personal phone > > Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe >: > > Hello GNSO Review Working Team: > > Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. > > I have summarized the comments received to date below: > > Comments to date: > > ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July > > ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July > > ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. > > ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted table > > Public Comment/Engagement: > This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. > ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. > ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted table. > > As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. > > I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. > > Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! > > Jen > > > jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB > Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm > 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 > IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > > > ________________________________ > > El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n > > > This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Jul 28 20:29:38 2015 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:29:38 -0400 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: <55B7E632.6000804@mail.utoronto.ca> Sounds sensible to me. Folks are swamped. cheers STephanie Perrin On 2015-07-28 12:59, Jen Wolfe wrote: > Thank you to everyone who has responded. Based upon the responses, I think we only have 3 people (including me) who can attend the call this Thursday, 30 July. If anyone else can attend, please let me know, but I'm concerned that without more attending the call, we will have to repeat much of the conversation when others can join and want to ensure we have sufficient feedback to move this initiative forward before the October Dublin meeting. Chuck and Osvlado, I so appreciate your availability, but also deeply respect your time and don't want you to feel like it is not productive because there are not enough groups represented on the call. > > I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more participation. I'm completely happy to still get on a call on Thursday if you all think that is going to be worthwhile, but also happy to send out a new Doodle poll to try to get more participation. > > Please let me know your comments and thoughts and we can plan accordingly. Thanks so much. For all of you heading on holiday - have a great one! > > Jen > > JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB > FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM > 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 > IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 > What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P > Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc > Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP > Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > > -----Original Message----- > From: Novoa, Osvaldo [mailto:onovoa at Antel.com.uy] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:35 PM > To: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de > Cc: Jen Wolfe ; gnso-review-dt at icann.org > Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting > > I am available for the 30th of July. > Best regards, > Osvaldo > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de" > escribi?: > > Thanks Jen, > I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. > > Wolf-Ulrich > > Sent from my personal phone > > Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe >: > > Hello GNSO Review Working Team: > > Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. > > I have summarized the comments received to date below: > > Comments to date: > > ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment on 16 July > > ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment on 23 July > > ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. > > ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted table > > Public Comment/Engagement: > This Public Comment period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. > ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session on Reviews. > ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted table. > > As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. > > I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. > > Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! > > Jen > > > jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB > Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm > 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 > IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > > > ________________________________ > > El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n > > > This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. > From charla.shambley at icann.org Wed Jul 29 17:07:44 2015 From: charla.shambley at icann.org (Charla Shambley) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:07:44 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Doodle Poll for Next Meeting Message-ID: <57e5b88b67a44e02b8fa1c7b3c84a969@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Dear GNSO Review WP -- By now you should have received a cancellation for the call tomorrow from the GNSO Secretariat. Per Jen's email below, I have set up a doodle poll so that we can schedule our next call in September to begin the discussion on implementation. I will close the doodle poll by COB Tuesday, 4 August. Also, just a reminder that we do have the wiki set up to capture your comments and initial assessment of the recommendations in the Draft Report . Your input into the feasibility and usefulness of each of the recommendations will be helpful during our next call. For those of you on holiday in August, enjoy! Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Program Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:00 AM To: Novoa, Osvaldo; Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de Cc: gnso-review-dt at icann.org; Larisa B. Gurnick Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting Thank you to everyone who has responded. Based upon the responses, I think we only have 3 people (including me) who can attend the call this Thursday, 30 July. If anyone else can attend, please let me know, but I'm concerned that without more attending the call, we will have to repeat much of the conversation when others can join and want to ensure we have sufficient feedback to move this initiative forward before the October Dublin meeting. Chuck and Osvlado, I so appreciate your availability, but also deeply respect your time and don't want you to feel like it is not productive because there are not enough groups represented on the call. I'd like to suggest we move this call to September when everyone will be back from August holiday and public comments will be completed and we could start to work on feedback towards implementation with more participation. I'm completely happy to still get on a call on Thursday if you all think that is going to be worthwhile, but also happy to send out a new Doodle poll to try to get more participation. Please let me know your comments and thoughts and we can plan accordingly. Thanks so much. For all of you heading on holiday - have a great one! Jen JENNIFER C. WOLFE, ESQ., APR, SSBB FOUNDER & PRESIDENT, WOLFE DOMAIN, A DIGITAL BRAND STRATEGY ADVISORY FIRM 513.746.2800 X 1 OR CELL 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOP 300 GLOBAL IP STRATEGISTS 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -----Original Message----- From: Novoa, Osvaldo [ mailto:onovoa at Antel.com.uy] Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 11:35 PM To: Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de Cc: Jen Wolfe < jwolfe at wolfedomain.com>; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Public Comments & Next Meeting I am available for the 30th of July. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone El 24/7/2015, a las 22:26, " Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de" < Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben at t-online.de> escribi?: Thanks Jen, I apologize not being able to attend the 30 July call. I'll refer to Osvaldo whether he could make it as alternative. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone Am 24.07.2015 um 20:38 schrieb Jen Wolfe < jwolfe at wolfedomain.com>: Hello GNSO Review Working Team: Thank you again for your continued time and commitment to this process. As you may have seen from our email thread, there have been some concerns expressed about the 24 July (today) deadline to provide public comments. I am reaching out to let you know that the schedule can accommodate extending the deadline for one additional week to 31 July so that any groups or individual who wish to comment have one more week to respond. I appreciate those groups who have completed their public comments and encourage everyone to have your respective groups provide comments by next week's deadline, which will be the final deadline in order for the finalized report to be issued on 31 August. I have summarized the comments received to date below: Comments to date: ? Brand Registry Group has submitted a comment< http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00000.html> on 16 July ? Registry Stakeholder Group has submitted a comment< http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00001.html> on 23 July ? In progress are comments from ISPCP and ALAC - all expected to be submitted by the current due date of 24 July. There may be others, but staff is not currently aware of this. ? 64 comments provided verbally during ICANN53 sessions - see posted< http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> table Public Comment/Engagement: This Public Comment< https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-review-draft-2015-06-01-en> period opened on 1 June and has been extended once to 24 July - total of 53 days. ? During ICANN53, Westlake conducted a total of 8 briefings for the community, in addition to a briefing included in the public session< https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-aoc-org-reviews> on Reviews. ? A total of 64 comments made during these presentations have been catalogued and are being considered by Westlake - see the posted< http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-01jun15/msg00002.html> table. As one additional point: we were scheduled to have a call next Thursday to discuss the comments and begin formulating our recommendation to the SIC on which recommendations we think should move into implementation. I would like to suggest that we proceed with the call as scheduled to use the time to touch base on comments and begin the conversation on implementation, but certainly understand if it would be more advantageous to wait until all public comments have been received. I would appreciate your feedback so we can either send out a new Doodle poll to reschedule or plan to proceed as scheduled. Thanks again for your continued support of this process! Have a great weekend! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5511 bytes Desc: not available URL: