[gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March

Fri Mar 20 16:13:59 UTC 2015

Dear all,

First, please allow me to express my apologies for dropping off of this discussion group pre-Singapore due to too much on my plate.  I believe that Steve Coates and perhaps one other BC member have joined in replacement.

Notwithstanding stepping back, I was just going through Chuck’s comments on the draft working text and wanted to also weigh-in on the following:

1.    From our research, we understand the NCUC, NPOC and NCSG membership lists are publicly available. The following SGs/Cs do not make membership information publicly available:  

 The RrSG and RySG   IPC   ISCPC and BC

The BC membership list is the first thing noted on our web site, right above our Charter: http://www.bizconst.org/members/ 

2.    That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a liaison (non-voting) to each GNSO PDP WG as a means of providing timely non-binding input.

Having been actively engaged in discussions for one (or more) GAC members to join the Nominating Committee, the issues govenrments face in providing liaisons to the Nom Com, working groups or other bodies is that no one nation can speak or act on behalf of another sovereign nation.  Hence, even if there was a significant number of GAC members in agreement with sending liaisons (and there is no evidence of that as far as I see) there is no current mechanism to effect what Westlake is suggesting.

Otherwise, I am generally supportive of Chuck’s contributions and recommend that they be carefully considered vis-à-vis incorporating the corrections/clarifications in the final draft.

Thank you.

Kind regards,

RA

PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: DELETE randruff at rnapartners.com <mailto:randruff at rnapartners.com> ; REPLACE WITH: RA at ONRconsulting.com <mailto:RA at ONRconsulting.com>  

Ron Andruff

ONR Consulting, Inc.

 <http://www.icannsherpa.com/> www.ICANNSherpa.com 

(+1) 917 770-2693

From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:47
To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March

Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party,

Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback  on Westlake’s Working Text.  If you have not had a chance to provide your comments yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March.  Please refer to Jen Wolfe’s email below for updates on the timeline.

There are several options for your convenience to send your comments:

*         Post your comments on the wiki <https://community.icann.org/x/LQYnAw>  (comments are organized by section of the working text)

*         Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org> )

*         Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached document.  Please send your email to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org> )

You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki <https://community.icann.org/x/LQYnAw> , listen to the recording <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-03mar15-en.mp3>  from the 3 March working session, or read the transcript <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/Transcript%20GNSO%20review%2003%20March%202015.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1426185135000&api=v2>  from that meeting.

Thank you,

Larisa

Larisa B. Gurnick

Director, Strategic Initiatives

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

 <mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org> larisa.gurnick at icann.org

310 383-8995

From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM
To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org <mailto:gnso-review-dt at icann.org> 
Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com <mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com> ); Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week.   You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated!

To address concerns regarding the timeline,  we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps.  I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns.

Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report.  You can send this through the list or post on the wiki.  All comments will be provided to Westlake.

When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report.  The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th.  Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule.  

I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way.  I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback.  I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May!

jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB

Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm

513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348

IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014

What will you do with your Dot Brand?  : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P 

Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs  http://ow.ly/Eblgc  

Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column  http://ow.ly/EbljP  

Linked In Group:  gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150320/6c1f2d0e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 48876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150320/6c1f2d0e/image001.jpg>