[gnso-review-dt] RE: Initial Survey Results - Feasibility Assessment of 36 Final Recommendations

[Gomes, Chuck]

Because there is no remote participation, I will not be able to participate in this meeting.  So I will share some of my initial thoughts for using the data to guide our suggestions regarding the recommendations.



It seems to me that it might make sense to suggest approval of any recommendations that came out as a high priority, easy implementation and low cost: Rec. #'s 6, 8 & 26.



If we add the rec's that were a high priority, medium difficulty & low cost: Rec. #'s 15, 16, & 27



If we add a high priority, medium difficulty and medium cost: Rec. # 2



If we add a medium priority with easy implementation and low cost:  Rec. # 17



If we add medium priority, medium difficulty & low cost:  # 1 & # 14



If we add a medium priority, medium difficulty and Medium cost: # 9 & #13



That would give us 12 recommendations that are at least medium priority, easy or medium difficult and low or medium cost.  We could do a quick review of those as a group and see if anyone objects to suggesting that those 12 be implemented as soon as possible without further review.   That would quickly reduce the number of recommendations down to 24.



I have no idea whether this approach makes sense to others but if it does it would save us a little time.



We could then look at the rest of the high recommendations that were either high difficulty and/or high cost and decide whether we would suggest they be implemented right away or in some delayed manner.



We could then review the remaining medium recommendations, etc.



Have a good meeting.



Chuck

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] on behalf of Larisa B. Gurnick [larisa.gurnick at icann.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:29 PM
To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Initial Survey Results - Feasibility Assessment of 36 Final Recommendations

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,
Attached is the Initial Summary of Survey Results based on survey responses you submitted reflecting your views on feasibility of implementation of each of the 36 recommendations.
The attached spread sheet has the following components:

1.       Summary tab – provides a composite for all recommendations, listing what appears to be the most prevalent view.

2.       Comments only tab – lists all the free-form comments submitted for each recommendation.

3.       1-36 tabs – extract from Survey Monkey of statistics, by recommendation where you can see the entire statistical summary

This information reflects 13 responses, of which 11 were complete and 2 incomplete.  Please note that the number of responders to a given question may vary –  responders were free to answer only those questions that they wished.

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey and we hope that you find this information useful for your discussion tomorrow as you consider how to formulate your feedback and feasibility assessment to the OEC.

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Mobile: 1 310 383-8995
Skype: larisa.gurnick


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20151018/703d9239/attachment.html>