Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review Working Party Draft Statement on Westlake Goverance’s Final GNSO Review Report

[Stephanie Perrin]

I think this is very sensible.  I offer only a few typo edits and one 
additional sentence in the attached markup version
Thanks!
Stephanie Perrin

On 2015-09-17 19:18, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> I took a first crack at possible Working Party comments on Westlake's 
> Recommendation 23 that we discussed in most of our meeting yesterday.  
> I have to confess that I am not real satisfied with my draft but I 
> hope that it will facilitate our efforts to create one even if we 
> ignore mine and start from scratch.
>
> If we do develop comments, I think that it would be important for us 
> to try to get unanimous approval by Working Team members who 
> participate in writing and approving the comments or, if we cannot do 
> that, at least provide an opportunity for minority statements.
>
> Open and free criticism is welcome including from those in the NPOC 
> like Klaus.
>
> Chuck
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150918/27cae205/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft Points on Westlake Goverance GNSO Review Final Reportsp.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 23108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-dt/attachments/20150918/27cae205/DraftPointsonWestlakeGoveranceGNSOReviewFinalReportsp.docx>