<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 10.00.9200.16921"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>Hi
everyone,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014>Let me say I think the starting point and breadth of
the survey is excellent. This is no easy task.</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>Please find attached
a number of proposed changes to the survey.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>The changes in part
reflect my role as a previous Names Council chair, GNSO council member,
Constituency member, and working party member of the 2008 GNSO council reform. I
tried to think through how I would manage in answering the questions, and where
I failed, have proposed changes.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>I have proposed a
new section for NomCom as this may help with responses putting all the relevant
questions in one place. NomCom appointees are a different flavour to other
groups, and the questions need to reflect this.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>I have also expanded
a bit the final section - where I have added Chuck's substantive proposals - and
indicated support to his other comments.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>In doing our work, I
have reviewed the answers this group got from the SIC about structure. It is
relevant also for us to remember the Board's original September resolution
(below) on the review. The Board expected the review to be forward looking
and we should fulfil that. </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014>Philip</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014><A
href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2013-09-28-en">https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2013-09-28-en</A></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN class=548345609-01072014>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><FONT size=3 face=Tahoma>In its
</FONT><A href="https://www.myicann.org/gnso-review?language=es"><FONT
color=#0000ff size=3 face=Tahoma>resolution</FONT></A><FONT size=3 face=Tahoma>
of 28 September 2013 the ICANN Board stated:</FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT
face=Tahoma>“<I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><SPAN
style="COLOR: blue">The expansion of the TLD space has increased the number and
variety of stakeholders participating in GNSO policy making and a review needs
to take place on schedule to examine whether the current model meets the needs
of <B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">a new generation</B> of stakeholders.
<?xml:namespace prefix = "o" ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
/><o:p></o:p></SPAN></I></FONT></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><SPAN style="COLOR: blue"><o:p><FONT size=3
face=Tahoma></FONT></o:p></SPAN></I></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><FONT size=3><FONT face=Tahoma><I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><SPAN style="COLOR: blue">GNSO Structure is
unlikely to accommodate the anticipated new stream of stakeholders resulting
from the expansion of the TLD space. The GNSO Review will be an important
vehicle for considering and addressing this issue. <B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">The unbalance that is already occurring</B>
needs to be addressed by the GNSO Review.
</SPAN></I>”</FONT></FONT></P></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><SPAN
class=548345609-01072014></SPAN></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>