<div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Team,</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">As previously mentioned, Ron and I sought the BC's opinion on the survey draft. Please find below some very comprehensive comments sent in by one BC member.</div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Best,</div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments about the survey.</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">First, just as a disclaimer--without context for some of the data points sought, my ability to judge content is limited.</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br>
</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">My comments are these:</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">* The current industry standard format for 5-option, scaled surveys does not include both "no opinion" and "not applicable".</font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">Rather, options generally fall across a spectrum, in order (, or its inverse), like this:</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">Strongly disagree</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">Disagree</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">Neither agree nor disagree</font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">Agree</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">Strongly agree</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">...with Does not apply on the far right or far left</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">* I do not understand why an asterisk alongside each numbered question. This is distracting to me, and appears to me to be unnecessary.</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">* My comment regarding Questions #7-end is that there is little difference between "no opinion" and "not applicable," and it is unclear to me what benefit discernment of these two things provides among the data to be collected. Also, the lack of a "neither agree nor disagree" in the middle interrupts the spectrum of choices and causes unnecessarily distraction. "Not applicable" does not appear to be useful at all, especially after the 'answerer' has already indicated an interest in that stakeholder group or constituency. On the other hand, if the question itself does not apply...it may have a better place to exist than this survey.</font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">RE: Question #9</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">- Consider including "governments" in the list.</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">- This one measures "not enough" but misses an easy opportunity to measure "too much".</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br>
</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">RE: Question #12. Are you involved with the GNSO Council?</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">This appears vague to me. As a survey respondent, I have much room for subjectivity. Perhaps it is desirable and possible to as a more specific question?</font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">RE: Questions #12 and #13</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">An incosistency that caused me to indicate an answer opposite the one intended. On Question #12, the "yes" is on top. On Question #13, the "yes" is on the bottom. I may not be the only one to look at placement and not the words.</font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">RE: Question #15</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">The font above text box does not match the font above the other text boxes</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">RE: All sections that appear following the "are you an observer or member of..." questions</font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff">There appears to be no delineation between observer and member. I can see the answers to these questions varying based upon which group--observer vs. member--one belongs. Perhaps it would be useful to have this delineation as well? As it stands, it appears that answers from observers carry the same weight as answers from members--which may be intentional.</font></div>
<div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font color="#0000ff"><br></font></div><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
<font color="#0000ff">I may have different thoughts with a better understanding of the tactical objectives of this survey. The data points selected to be used may be very well thought-out. My comment about that is only that we be assured that the layout of the survey, and the questions in it, allow us to receive the greatest benefit possible as a result.</font></div>
<div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr">Stéphane Van Gelder<br>Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur<br><span style="font-size:small;font-family:arial">Milathan LTD</span><div>"Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice"<font face="arial"><br>
</font><br>T (FR): <a value="+33620405589" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)">+33 (0)6 20 40 55 89</a><br>T (UK): <a value="+447583457053" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)">+44 (0)7583 457053</a><br>Skype: SVANGELDER<br><a href="http://www.stephanevangelder.com/" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank">www.Milathan.com</a><div>
----------------<br>Discover The Milathan Post on <a href="http://post.milathan.com" target="_blank">http://post.milathan.com</a></div></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 July 2014 22:51, Jen Wolfe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jwolfe@wolfedomain.com" target="_blank">jwolfe@wolfedomain.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="14783e5a0434cd66__MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I completely agree and think it’s important we clearly help the survey taker to understand that they can elect for their comments
and responses to be anonymous. <u></u><u></u></span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I don’t think we want to mislead the survey taker into thinking that their comments won’t be made available to the community or considered by the Review Party
if they elect for confidentiality. My understanding is that we would still have data points on those responses and the qualitative comments, we just would attribute to a specific person but rather categorically to how the survey taker responded to questions
about ICANN experience. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Larisa or Richard, could you please confirm that’s how the data will be aggregated and presented to the Working Party and the community?
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thank you to everyone for continued debate and participation in this discussion.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.5pt"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#0e325f;text-transform:uppercase">jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.5pt"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#0e325f;text-transform:uppercase">Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.5pt"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#0e325f;text-transform:uppercase">managing partner, wolfe, sadler, breen, morasch & colby, an intellectual property law firm,
<i>named top u.s. trademark law firm by corp intl 2013</i><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.5pt"><b><i><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#4bacc6;text-transform:uppercase">IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011, 2012 & 2013<u></u><u></u></span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:13.5pt"><b><i><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";color:#4bacc6;text-transform:uppercase">513.746.2801<u></u><u></u></span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:3.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#3b6ca5">Follow Me:</span></b><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray"> </span></b><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jenwolfe" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="20" height="20" src="cid:image001.png@01CFAB4D.3D039470" alt="Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0"></span></b></a><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray"> </span></b><a href="http://pinterest.com/wolfedomain/" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="20" height="20" src="cid:image002.png@01CFAB4D.3D039470" alt="Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image002.png@01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0"></span></b></a><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:gray"> </span></b><a href="https://twitter.com/jenwolfe" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="20" height="20" src="cid:image003.png@01CFAB4D.3D039470" alt="Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image003.png@01CDC0CD.AB7D59C0"></span></b></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">
</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:3.0pt"><a href="http://www.jenwolfe.com/blog" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Follow My Blog</span></b></a><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#3b6ca5"><u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:3.0pt"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Names-Rewired-Strategies-Protection/dp/1118312627" target="_blank"><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Domain Names Rewired</span></b></a><b><span style="font-size:7.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#3b6ca5"><u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""> <a href="mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 29, 2014 4:44 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Mike Rodenbaugh</span></p><div class=""><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick; <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
</div><b>Subject:</b> RE: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised<u></u><u></u><p></p>
</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Some people are much more candid if they can be anonymous.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chuck<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Mike Rodenbaugh [<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 29, 2014 4:17 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick; <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">That is another approach, but we still favor a default public response, since we should want as many candid, informed, public responses as possible. Curious to hear Westlake and others' views on this.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Mike Rodenbaugh<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">RODENBAUGH LAW<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" value="+14157388087" target="_blank">+1.415.738.8087</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Here’s another approach for consideration (suggested by Rubens Kuhl from the RySG): “</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:black">I
don't think that defaulting either to confidential or not confidential should be done. This first question can be mandatory so the respondent picks whether it's confidential or not, instead of us, IPC, ICANN or Westlake.</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">”</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chuck</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:48 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick; <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">
gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Still has the wrong default, in IPC's opinion, and per general ICANN notions of transparency. How about this?<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">“</span><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">Your </span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#00b0f0">identity</span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"> will
remain confidential to Westlake as the independent reviewer, if you so elect by checking the box below. Otherwise your identified response will be shared for further analysis with the GNSO Review Working Party and supporting ICANN staff.</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">”</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Mike Rodenbaugh</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">RODENBAUGH LAW</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" target="_blank">+1.415.738.8087</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Would the following rewording work:</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">“</span><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#00b0f0">Identity
of responders </span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">will not be made available publicly. Your
</span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#00b0f0">identity</span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"> will remain confidential to Westlake as the independent reviewer,
unless you are willing for your </span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#00b0f0">identity</span></b><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black"> to be shared for further analysis
with the GNSO Review Working Party and supporting ICANN staff, please indicate in the consent box below</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">”
</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chuck</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 29, 2014 1:46 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick; <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">
gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Good then we at least agree as to the body of the responses. But the current draft instructions seem clear that the entire response will remain confidential only to Westlake, not
even to Staff:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="margin-bottom:3.75pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:black">Individual responses will not be made available publicly. Your input will remain confidential to Westlake
as the independent reviewer, unless you are willing for your individual feedback to be shared for further analysis with the GNSO Review Working Party and supporting ICANN staff, please indicate in the consent box below</span></b><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="1529" style="width:917.25pt">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="1529" valign="top" style="width:917.25pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
<div style="margin-right:3.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">( ) I consent to the independent reviewer sharing my individual feedback with the GNSO Review Working Party and supporting ICANN staff
for the express purpose of assisting with the 2014 GNSO Review.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-right:3.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div style="margin-right:3.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">We still may disagree as to whether names should be attached to the response by default. We in the IPC think giving an 'opt out'
to public disclosure is sufficient protection for the relatively few people who would want to keep their name out of the purview of the Working Party and/or public. When evaluating the responses, it is important to know who is speaking.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Mike Rodenbaugh</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">RODENBAUGH LAW</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" target="_blank">+1.415.738.8087</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Mike,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">If I am understanding you correctly, I wonder whether we are talking past each other. In advocating
for confidentiality, I am not saying that responses should be confidential but rather that the identity of the responder should be kept confidential by default. I think that the responses should be publicly available.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chuck</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 29, 2014 1:12 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick; <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">
gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks Chuck. In a nutshell, we think the survey responses will be very important, and should not generally be kept secret. In order for the Working Party to do its job, and for
the public to properly weigh in on the recommendations of Westlake and/or the Working Party, the underlying data generally needs to be made available. ICANN is an open and transparent organization, data and opinions are typically shared publicly for the benefit,
input and buy-in of the entire community. Those respondents who wish to maintain confidentiality of their response can elect to do so, and so that should address any confidentiality concern.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Mike Rodenbaugh</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">RODENBAUGH LAW</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" target="_blank">+1.415.738.8087</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Mike,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">There has been pretty good discussion on the RySG list about this. Several people have asked for
the IPC rationale. I communicated that the main reason I heard was transparency. If you can add to that, I will share it with the RySG.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chuck</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:<a href="mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">mike@rodenbaugh.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:27 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick; <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">
gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Chuck,<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Unless I missed it, I didn't hear anyone but you advocating for a change to the prior draft's default. After our London interaction, I figured the issue might be discussed by the
entire Working Party but I don't think that has happened; so clearly now is the time to have that discussion.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Mike Rodenbaugh</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">RODENBAUGH LAW</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" target="_blank">+1.415.738.8087</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com" target="_blank">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Mike,</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Unless I missed it, I didn’t hear anyone but you advocating for the default being ‘public response’
but I forwarded the IPC position to the RySG list to see if any of our participants feel the same.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Chuck</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a href="mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Mike Rodenbaugh<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, July 28, 2014 7:38 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Larisa B. Gurnick<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org" target="_blank">gnso-review-dt@icann.org</a>; Richard G A Westlake<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review 360 Assessment - Revised</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks Larisa. IPC notes that the confidentiality default has been changed from the previous draft, so that now responses by default will only be viewed by Westlake. I did not
note consensus in the Working Party for such a change. IPC's position is that the default should be public response, with the clear option for any respondent to choose their particular response to remain confidential. We see no justification for 'default
confidential' response, given the importance of this review and of ICANN's goal to be a transparent organization. The Working Party and the public should have access to the vast majority of the responses so we can adequately comment on Westlake's analysis
of them.<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Curious to hear others' thoughts on this issue, and Staff/Westlake justification for making this change.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">Mike Rodenbaugh</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">RODENBAUGH LAW</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"">tel/fax: <a href="tel:%2B1.415.738.8087" target="_blank">+1.415.738.8087</a></span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial","sans-serif""><a href="http://rodenbaugh.com" target="_blank">http://rodenbaugh.com</a> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Larisa B. Gurnick <<a href="mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org" target="_blank">larisa.gurnick@icann.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear All,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Westlake Governance team modified the 360 Assessment based on feedback received last week. The revised 360 Assessment is available
<a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GNSO360ReviewUATv3" target="_blank">here</a>. Please provide your final feedback and any additional comments from your constituencies <b><u>by August 1, 23:59 UTC</u></b>.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The responder now has the option of skipping the detailed questions pertaining to the GNSO Council, Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies. A responder who is directly involved
or is a close observer in any of these groups, will be able to answer detailed questions for as many groups as he/she would like.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The introductory language will be further refined to provide a clear roadmap of the different sections of the Assessment and the options available to the responder.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please note that staff is in the process of completing a detailed proofing and editing to ensure proper spelling, capitalization, definition of acronyms, etc.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you for your feedback and commitment to making this assessment useful and informative.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i>Larisa B. Gurnick</i></b><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Director, Strategic Initiatives<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:larisa.gurnick@icann.org" target="_blank">larisa.gurnick@icann.org</a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="tel:310%20383-8995" target="_blank">310 383-8995</a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>