<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I wish to withdraw part of my statement. I assumed I knew the short
list who uttered those statements. I can't know and there is every
chance that I am wrong. I am glad I did not name names, but I must
say, the problem remains with the quotes and the fact that many have
already had the same assumption about the speakers I had.<br>
<br>
Apologies for the intemperance on that one point.<br>
<br>
I do request that the incendiary quotes be removed from the report.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12-Feb-15 07:35, Avri Doria wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:54DBE72A.8090707@acm.org" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Personally I find it unfortuante that your draft report put out
calumnious quotes that have no basic in fact. I for one have been
working very hard to help NPOC make its way in the NCSG and find
the fact that this is what you picked to include so very
unfortunate. Now instead of dealing with the substance of the
report the NCUC is going to have to deal with arguing against the
lies.<br>
<br>
It also seems that you went against your rule of not including
quotes where the speaker could be identified. While it may be
hard to pin the specific speaker, the choice of one of two
possible speakers is relatively easy. What you have done is take
a sometimes difficult situation that has been improving over the
years, entered it as patisans and made it so much worse. Now a
competition of who can mud sling best is going to be much harder
to contain.<br>
<br>
It is sad that you have made the work of consensus building so
much harder.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>