<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:"Consolas","serif";}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:1380473289;
mso-list-template-ids:-1704839880;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:3.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:3.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:4.0in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:bullet;
mso-level-text:;
mso-level-tab-stop:4.5in;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Symbol;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Bill,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I think it is still somewhat up in the error. I suggested in our call yesterday that we could use some time talking about a possible statement but everyone
else seemed to want to wait because the OEC gave us more time.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> William Drake [mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 01, 2015 2:07 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Gomes, Chuck<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Sam Lanfranco; Rudi Vansnick; gnso-review-dt@icann.org; Excom NPOC<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [gnso-review-dt] NPOC comments, remarks and statement to the GNSO rec 23.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks for the textual exegesis. I’m ok with food for thought, although I suspect it may lead to indigestion. But sorry to be dense, having missed the call I’m not clear how we are proceeding with respect to the statement on 23, on which
we put in time through an iterative process but then got some dissent. Could someone give me a step by step here on whether we are hoping for some further process that will lead to consensus, or are instead submitting it just on behalf of the like minded,
or what?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bill<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sep 30, 2015, at 9:15 PM, Gomes, Chuck <<a href="mailto:cgomes@verisign.com">cgomes@verisign.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thank you very much Sam. That answers my questions and I believe that the Working Party is on the same page as the NPOC.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span class="apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">Sam
Lanfranco [<a href="mailto:sam@lanfranco.net"><span style="color:purple">mailto:sam@lanfranco.net</span></a>]<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:06 PM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Gomes, Chuck; Rudi Vansnick;<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org"><span style="color:purple">gnso-review-dt@icann.org</span></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Excom NPOC<br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Re: [gnso-review-dt] NPOC comments, remarks and statement to the GNSO rec 23.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">As part of the NPOC ExCom I will respond to Chuck's query with regard to the NPOC statement on the Westlake final GNSO review report.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<br>
I will relay the sense of our position here, but Rudi and others may wish to add more.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
NPOC is not suggesting that the GNSO Review be started over, and it of course supports the Working Party process. <span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<br>
As a contributor to the phrasing in the document, here is my perspective on the challenges that are ahead for this process. There is a general feeling that the well meaning Westlake people failed to understand much about ICANN and the context in which the GNSO
operates, and that this impacted on how they arrived at their recommendations. As a result I would suggest that the Report be treated like yet another submission with regard to the GNSO (albeit an expensive one with some identified flaws in methods used),
and that the Report be used as food for thought.<br>
<br>
Working Party implementation guidelines should be based on the importance of issues in their own right and not just because they were flagged by the Report. As well, being listed in the report can bring issues to our attention but in and of itself should not
justify their inclusion in implementation guidelines. In my view, to protect the interests of C's and SGs we have to guard against any top down push to use select parts of the Report. I of course support the process whereby suggestions made by the Working
Party are considered by the broader GNSO community, and do see that as "bottom-up".<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<br>
Sam L, Chair<br>
NPOC Policy Committee<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><br>
<br>
On 30/09/2015 1:49 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Rudi,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Let me add my thanks to that from others for a thoughtful statement. I do have a few questions though.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">More clarity in terms of what the NPOC means in terms of the following would be helpful: “</span>return the Review of the GNSO to
a bottom up stakeholder decision making process<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">”. My understanding is that the Working Party will now review the recommendations with the goal of suggesting some implementation
guidelines to the GNSO as a whole. Because the Working Party is fully open and representation is encouraged from all C’s and SGs and others and because any suggestions we make will be considered by the broader GNSO community, would the NPOC consider that
process to be “</span>a bottom up stakeholder decision making process<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">”? Or is the NPOC suggesting that the GNSO Review be started over?</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">There are other options of course rather than using the Working Party. An Implementation Review Team could be formed along the lines
of what happens for policy issues.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I asked these questions of you but I realize that they are really for all of us in the Working Party to consider as we evaluate our
next steps.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Chuck</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span class="apple-converted-space"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""><a href="mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org"><span style="color:purple">owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org</span></a><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>[<a href="mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org"><span style="color:purple">mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@icann.org</span></a>]<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><b>On
Behalf Of<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Rudi Vansnick<br>
<b>Sent:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:32 AM<br>
<b>To:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="mailto:gnso-review-dt@icann.org"><span style="color:purple">gnso-review-dt@icann.org</span></a><br>
<b>Cc:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Excom NPOC<br>
<b>Subject:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>[gnso-review-dt] NPOC comments, remarks and statement to the GNSO rec 23.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt">Dear GNSO review party members,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">NPOC has reviewed the Westlake Governance's Final GNSO Review Report and submits the following comments and observations. <br>
<br>
First, we wish to set the context for these comments. NPOC consists of and represents non-profit and civil society constituency organizations. NPOC strives to encompass and represent the interests and concerns of that vast constituency of organizations for
whom the Internet ecosystem and DNS operational concerns impact on their mission and their work, but for whom their mission and work focus on community development, social justice, human services, etc., and not on the Internet per se. <br>
<br>
NPOC sees outreach to the constituency to raise awareness and engagement as central to its mission, and as important as bringing constituency organizations into ICANN volunteer work and ICANN policy development and implementation. For a multistakeholder organization
to survive and thrive there is need for broad and deep constituency engagement. <br>
<br>
In NPOC’s review of the Final GNSO Review Report two specific issues stand out. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;background:white">The first concern, shared with other constituencies, is that the methods used to gather and analyze evidence in the report have serious shortcomings. <o:p></o:p></li><li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;background:white">The second is that a number of the conclusions and recommendations lack appreciation of the context within ICANN, lack an adequate evidence base, and are under defined for purposes of implementation.<o:p></o:p></li></ul>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white">However, NPOC does not wish to address specific issues within the conclusions and recommendations contained in the Report. To do so would overlook the broader issue of methods used. It also risks offering validation
of Report content where validation is not warranted. <br>
<br>
NPOC has larger concerns with regard to the potential uses of the Report. NPOC would have no issue with the Final GNSO Review Report being treated as a "green paper" and food for thought within the ICANN multistakeholder community. NPOC would have serious reservations
about the report being used as "expert" justification for top-down ICANN Board action with regard to the GNSO. That would be an abuse of the ways in which expertise should be incorporated into decision making in what should be a bottom up multistakeholder
decision making process. <br>
<br>
In short, NPOC calls for the Board to treat the Westlake Final GNSO Review Report as food for thought and return the Review of the GNSO to a bottom up stakeholder decision making process. Such a process may take longer, and be a bit less orderly, but it will
have greater legitimacy within ICANN’s remit as a multistakeholder organization and produce better results in the long run. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Rudi Vansnick</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><a href="http://www.npoc.org/"><span style="color:purple">www.npoc.org</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><a href="mailto:rudi.vansnick@npoc.org"><span style="color:purple">rudi.vansnick@npoc.org</span></a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Tel : +32 (0)9 329 39 16</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Mobile : +32 (0)475 28 16 32</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="background:white"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<pre style="background:white">-- <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">in an unjust state" -Confucius<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">email: <a href="mailto:Lanfran@Yorku.ca"><span style="color:purple">Lanfran@Yorku.ca</span></a> Skype: slanfranco<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">blog: <a href="http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com/"><span style="color:purple">http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="background:white">Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852<o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">*********************************************************<br>
William J. Drake<br>
International Fellow & Lecturer<br>
Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ<br>
University of Zurich, Switzerland<br>
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, <br>
ICANN, <a href="http://www.ncuc.org">www.ncuc.org</a><br>
<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch">william.drake@uzh.ch</a> (direct), <a href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com">wjdrake@gmail.com</a> (lists),<br>
<a href="http://www.williamdrake.org">www.williamdrake.org</a><br>
<i>Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap </i><a href="http://goo.gl/sRR01q">http://goo.gl/sRR01q</a><br>
*********************************************************<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>