[Gnso-review-wg] Final Implementation Plan and Motion

Pascal Bekono pbekono at gmail.com
Sun Nov 20 20:57:30 UTC 2016


Hello Julie,

I think that it's fine. Good job !

Pascal

2016-11-20 11:18 GMT+01:00 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>:

> Dear Jen, Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO Review WG members,
>
>
>
> Please see the attached Final Implementation Plan for delivery to the GNSO
> Council tomorrow, 21 November, which is the document and motion deadline
> for the GNSO Council meeting on 01 December.  Also attached is a motion for
> GNSO Council consideration for adoption of the plan.  Note that the edits
> suggested below by Wolf-Ulrich have been incorporated.  Also, staff have
> added a sample possible Gantt timeline for the implementation of the Phase
> III medium and low priority recommendations.  As noted in the document,
> these are sample possible timelines that will likely be altered during
> implementation, provided in accordance with the Board request for the
> implementation plan to contain realistic timelines.
>
>
>
> Wolf-Ulrich has agreed to convey the implementation plan and motion
> tomorrow on behalf of the GNSO Review WG.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-review-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <
> julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Friday, November 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM
> *To: *WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg at icann.org"
> <gnso-review-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan
>
>
>
> Dear Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO WG members,
>
>
>
> Please see the attached revised version of the implementation plan with
> redlines reflecting the proposed edits below, in Word and PDF.  Please let
> us know by COB today if there are any further changes.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-review-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <
> julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:35 PM
> *To: *WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg at icann.org"
> <gnso-review-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation
> Plan
>
>
>
> Thanks so much Wolf-Ulrich.  Those are very helpful changes.  I’ll send a
> redlined version with your suggested edits a bit later today.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> *From: *WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> *Reply-To: *WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
> *Date: *Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:27 PM
> *To: *Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg at icann.org"
> <gnso-review-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation
> Plan
>
>
>
> Thanks Julie and all for the work done so far.
>
> I don’t have comments with respect how to handle the recommendations.
>
> Regarding the timeline I think corresponding colours should be used in the
> Gantt chart as for the phases (page 33).
>
> Maybe in the executive summary it is useful to explain as a target that
> the implementation should be finished appropriate time before the next GNSO
> review is supposed to be started (which will be in 2019). In addition, I
> wonder whether it is possible to explain in the summary how we’re going to
> deal with the budget question (e.g. still under consideration).
>
>
>
> Small typo on page 1 para 1: 2x “approved”.
>
>
>
> I’m ready to introduce a related motion to the next council meeting.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
> *From:* Julie Hedlund
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:41 AM
>
> *To:* gnso-review-wg at icann.org
>
> *Subject:* [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan
>
>
>
> Dear GNSO Review WG members,
>
>
>
> Per the highlighted action items below from today’s meeting, please see
> the attached Final Draft Implementation Plan for your review.  The document
> is provided in redline and clean versions, and in Word and PDF.  Please
> note that the redlines reflect both the changes captured during today’s
> call, and also further suggested edits by staff for grammar and consistency
> in the recommendations.  Finally, staff has suggested some additional
> details to be added to the Executive Summary and Overview of
> Recommendations since the Background has been moved to an Annex.
>
>
>
> *Action items:*
>
> 1.      Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it
> to the WG on 15 November (DONE).
>
> 2.      WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan
> by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final
> implementation plan.
>
> 3.      Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send
> to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the
> document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December
> Council meeting.
>
>
>
> Please provide any final edits or comments as noted in the actions above
> by *Friday, 18 November*.  Any edits or comments will be addressed in the
> final version of the plan that will be sent to the GNSO Council on Monday,
> 21 November.
>
>
>
> Thank you all for your assistance in this important process.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-review-wg mailing list
> Gnso-review-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-review-wg mailing list
> Gnso-review-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20161120/81fa27a7/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-review-wg mailing list