[Gnso-review-wg] Mp3, AC recording, AC Chat and attendance GNSO Review Working Group 23 February 2017

Terri Agnew terri.agnew at icann.org
Thu Feb 23 15:17:21 UTC 2017


Dear all, 

 

Please find the MP3 and Adobe Connect recording for the GNSO Review Working
Group held on 23 February 2017 at 13:00 UTC

 

MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-23feb17-en.mp3 

Adobe Connect Recording:
<https://participate.icann.org/p1wev5gj38q/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=d2bb332eb83bd37e
112e25e7751c52e54fb922234e519726f89516ceebbbd6db>
https://participate.icann.org/p1wev5gj38q/

 

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master
Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group
-2Dactivities_calendar&d=DQMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5c
M&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=xZIJEMTVQJAaGhrSEs-mGNP1af
5ZhtLo5tjqyJUr5j4&s=zi8HqkcJPzyRZtbiQ-TlsxBQhcExCdcb-3Ezk1dDjec&e=> 

 

Mailing list archives:  <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/>
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/

Wiki page:  https://community.icann.org/x/ZhmsAw

 

Attendees:

Members:

Heath Dixon (RrSG Primary)

Sara Bockey (RrSG Alternate)

Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary)

Donna Austin (RySG Alternate)

Rafik Dammak (NCSG Primary)

Avri Doria (NCSG (alternate)

Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP)

Osvaldo Novoa (ISPCP)

 

Participants:

Renata Aquino  Ribeiro (NCUC)

 

Apologies: 

Lori Schulman

 

ICANN staff:

Marika Konings

Julie Hedlund

Negar Farzinnia

Berry Cobb

Terri Agnew

 

** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **

 

Thank you.

Kind regards,

 

Terri

-------------------------------

Adobe Connect chat transcript for 23 February 2017

  

  Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Review WG Kick-Off Meeting on Thursday, 23
February 2017 at 13:00 UTC for 60 minutes

  Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_v
6HRAw
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_
v6HRAw&d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpC
IgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=x5p02eNgvidHFy-KF4vnbbzWJiSMsphJQW4ZY3-RJh
s&s=fKymFxWpyRH3eZjx4NJFIZRZl3ostGgjMgwCmYCqUvs&e>
&d=DwICaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXh
FzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=x5p02eNgvidHFy-KF4vnbbzWJiSMsphJQW4ZY3-RJhs&s=fK
ymFxWpyRH3eZjx4NJFIZRZl3ostGgjMgwCmYCqUvs&e= 

  Rafik:hi all

  Julie Hedlund:Hello everyone and welcome!

  Terri Agnew:Welcome Renata Aquino Ribeiro

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:Hi thanks

  Terri Agnew:Welcome Donna Austin

  Heath Dixon:I'm not seeing the next slides.

  Julie Hedlund:@Heath -- you might need to refresh your adobe connect room.

  Terri Agnew:@Heath, try another browser

  Heath Dixon:Have we decided on this time?

  Julie Hedlund:@Heath: We did ask when people filled in the poll to
consider whether this might be a recurring time, but can discuss that.

  avri doria:pardon my multple entries. somehow i have to reboot my computer
everytime i start AC or i lose sound.  BTW why doesn't GNSO calls have the
call back mechanism activated that At Large calls have.

  Heath Dixon:QUESTION: So what does that mean to do both phases at the same
time?  FOr example, in the first meeting, will the agenda be to move through
as many of the Phase 1 items as possible, or to move through a fixed number
of those?

  Terri Agnew:@Avri, most At-Large adobe connect rooms are set up similiar
to this GNSO room. What At-Large call did you join with a call back feature?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:I'd second Heath's question

  Donna Austin, Neustar:I have a conflict at the ICANN meeting

  Sara Bockey:I'm good with every other week.  How long will the meetings
be? Sorry if I missed it. Early here

  Heath Dixon:COMMENT: I'm fine with every other week, but would prefer
14:00 UTC to 13:00 UTC.

  Julie Hedlund:@Sara: I think the meetings would be 60 minutes.

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:yes 15d is good

  Julie Hedlund:@Heath: We can do another doodle poll.

  Sara Bockey:great!

  Donna Austin, Neustar:I would also prefer 1400 UTC

  avri doria:this time slot will occasionally conflict with ws2

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:doodle poll is best

  Heath Dixon:COMMENT: I can't attend ICANN 58 but will participate
remotely.

  avri doria:we should avoid the  3 WS2 time tracks

  Julie Hedlund:@Jen: Will do a poll for the week of 27 March.

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:good

  Julie Hedlund:@Avri -- noted!

  Heath Dixon:Can only read part of slide

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:(had to be w/out sound for a while, hopefully will
get it back soon and trying to follow anyway)

  Heath Dixon:Can we change slide proportion so it's all on screen?

  Terri Agnew:everyone can scroll themselves

  Heath Dixon:THere.  That fixed it.

 Heath Dixon:QUESTION:

  Heath Dixon:I think it's better if we answer the question later.

  Heath Dixon:SOrry.

  Heath Dixon:QUESTION: For the ones where work remains to be done, do we
decide what work is to be done at the Charter stage, or does the Charter
simply indicate the proposed Implementation Steps and then the people
working on the Recommendation decide the work?  Trying to understand how
much work (and decision-making needs to happen at the Charter stage versus
the Working stage.

  Heath Dixon:OK, if you can't here me I'll type.  Please continue while I
ype.

  Terri Agnew:@Heath, your mic isn't active, please active your mic or
provide me a telephone number and the op can dial out on the telephone

  Terri Agnew:to active your mic, top tool bar, select the telephone icon
and follow the prompts

  Heath Dixon:COMMENT: "The background of each of these is..."  This is the
point I was trying to make with my first question a minute ago.  To me,
where the information is the same for each, and where it's already  in the
plan, seems unnecessary to repeat it all here.

  Heath Dixon:Exactly right.

  Heath Dixon:COMMENT: Also, if there are areas in these documents that are
N/A for all (or most), seems like we should pull those out to streamline.
THe longer these are, the more time they demand from people trying to read
them and understand what we're doing.

  Heath Dixon:RE: Portfolio - exactly.

  Marika Konings:so the proposed solution already happened? It may be worth
to make that clearer.

  Marika Konings:so not 'proposed' but 'Solution applied' or something like
that?

  Renata Aquino Ribeiro:apologies, dropping off the call, will check
recording and follow up on list

  Heath Dixon:COMMENT: For all of these, we need to answer the question:
"What else needs to be done after the proposed solution is implemented?"
Presumably we should not need to do anything else, but the GNSO may need to
monitor, report, periodically review and decide whether to make changes,
etc.  For ones where work is being done elsewhere, the question is: Do we
trust those WGs to include follow-up?  Or do we want to interject our own
follow-up?

Heath Dixon:COMMENT: On the time-to-review point, I would be happy to see
these roll out as ICANN Staff completes the first drafts, rather than
waiting to get them in a batch.  It will be easier for me to review them one
at a time.

  Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:agree to Heath

  Heath Dixon:Julie, et al., thank you for the work!

  Rafik:well it is late in Asia :)

  Sara Bockey:thanks all

  Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks and good bye!

  avri doria:bye

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20170223/d295fd3e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5018 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20170223/d295fd3e/smime-0001.p7s>


More information about the Gnso-review-wg mailing list