[Gnso-review-wg] Agenda and Materials for GNSO Review WG Meeting 30 March 2017

Wolf-Ulrich Knoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Thu Mar 30 06:17:54 UTC 2017


Thanks Julie,

Rec 15: page 2, 2nd line, delete "the motion at"

             Nr. 3 as action item for staff?

With respect to the implementation tracking tool I think important is a 
link to the related implementation charters. From these two documents 
tasks for the implementation team(s) plus timeline should be clear.

Looking forward to talking to you later today.

Wolf-Ulrich


Am 29.03.2017 um 23:05 schrieb Julie Hedlund:
>
> Dear GNSO Review Working Group members,
>
> Please see below the notes and action items from the meeting on 15 
> March.  Per the action items revised charters are attached with 
> redlines to show changes from the previous versions. These have been 
> loaded into the Adobe Connect room for discussion during tomorrow’s 
> call: Thursday, 30 March at 1200 UTC.  Please also see the draft 
> agenda for tomorrow’s call as follows:
>
> 1.  Review agenda
>
> 2.  SOIs
>
> 3.  Review revised draft charters based on actions from ICANN58
>
> 4. Recommendation implementation tracking tool
>
> 5.  Meeting Schedule: Next meeting 13 April
>
> 6.  AOB
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
> *Action Items/Discussion Notes 15 March*
>
> *Action Items: *
>
> *1.*Staff will update the recommendation charters based on the notes 
> captured below.
>
> *2.*On recommendations 16 & 18 staff will review the recommendations 
> in the DMPM Final Report concerning Policy Impact Analysis.
>
> *Discussion Notes:*
>
> _Recommendation 8_
>
> --Question: Does the WG become the IRT?
>
> --Answer: It is not expected that the WG would become the IRT, but 
> some continuity is very helpful.  Example: Registrar Transfer Policy.  
> It is not envisioned that all Working Group members will join an IRT.  
> The Procedures call for other experts as well.  One scenario: when 
> more than 1 PDP is implemented the is an option to merge IRTs into 
> one.  GNSO Operating Procedures call for the formation of the IRT, but 
> the WG will no longer exist.
>
> _Recommendation 15:_
>
> --Question: What was the original request for timeliness?
>
> --Answer: Several years ago there was a project or an intent to 
> address how to make PDPs go faster.  What was the PDP Improvements 
> Project Initiative.  Staff can research how these efforts originated.  
> The Expedited PDP assumed that certain work could be done, but does 
> that satisfy this recommendation?  Per the PDP intiative one of the 
> changes is that Policy Staff include the draft charters in the 
> Preliminary Issue Report.  The wording of the recommendation may have 
> been overtaken by time.  Think about recommending a more formal 
> process be undertaken for speeding up PDPs. Perhaps, periodically in 
> PDPs to share ideas how it could be speeded up.
>
> _Recommendation 14:_
>
> Question: Should PDP WGs be encouraged to phase or "chunk" PDPs?
>
> Answer: It depends on the PDP, the amount of work, the volunteer 
> capacity.  It should be encouraged when it works.  Classic was the 
> Registrar Transfer Policy, currently the RDS PDP broken into 3 phases. 
>  Should language be added to the PDP Manual to promote phasing?
>
> KPI: How to reword?  Staff will address that.
>
> _Recommendations 16&18: _
>
> --Question: Where is the Policy Impact Analysis included?
>
> --Answer: Staff will look into whether a recommendation has been made 
> and whether this has been address.
>
> --Question: Does this relate specifically to the outcome of the 
> recommendations and the DMPM.
>
> --Answer: Staff will provide additional analysis.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-review-wg mailing list
> Gnso-review-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

-- 

Am Steinringer Berg 19
53639 Königswinter
Tel: 02244 873999
Fax: 02244 873955
Mob: 0151 1452 5867

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20170330/98c156d4/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-review-wg mailing list