[Gnso-review-wg] Agenda and Materials for GNSO Review WG Meeting 30 March 2017
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Thu Mar 30 06:17:54 UTC 2017
Thanks Julie,
Rec 15: page 2, 2nd line, delete "the motion at"
Nr. 3 as action item for staff?
With respect to the implementation tracking tool I think important is a
link to the related implementation charters. From these two documents
tasks for the implementation team(s) plus timeline should be clear.
Looking forward to talking to you later today.
Wolf-Ulrich
Am 29.03.2017 um 23:05 schrieb Julie Hedlund:
>
> Dear GNSO Review Working Group members,
>
> Please see below the notes and action items from the meeting on 15
> March. Per the action items revised charters are attached with
> redlines to show changes from the previous versions. These have been
> loaded into the Adobe Connect room for discussion during tomorrow’s
> call: Thursday, 30 March at 1200 UTC. Please also see the draft
> agenda for tomorrow’s call as follows:
>
> 1. Review agenda
>
> 2. SOIs
>
> 3. Review revised draft charters based on actions from ICANN58
>
> 4. Recommendation implementation tracking tool
>
> 5. Meeting Schedule: Next meeting 13 April
>
> 6. AOB
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
> *Action Items/Discussion Notes 15 March*
>
> *Action Items: *
>
> *1.*Staff will update the recommendation charters based on the notes
> captured below.
>
> *2.*On recommendations 16 & 18 staff will review the recommendations
> in the DMPM Final Report concerning Policy Impact Analysis.
>
> *Discussion Notes:*
>
> _Recommendation 8_
>
> --Question: Does the WG become the IRT?
>
> --Answer: It is not expected that the WG would become the IRT, but
> some continuity is very helpful. Example: Registrar Transfer Policy.
> It is not envisioned that all Working Group members will join an IRT.
> The Procedures call for other experts as well. One scenario: when
> more than 1 PDP is implemented the is an option to merge IRTs into
> one. GNSO Operating Procedures call for the formation of the IRT, but
> the WG will no longer exist.
>
> _Recommendation 15:_
>
> --Question: What was the original request for timeliness?
>
> --Answer: Several years ago there was a project or an intent to
> address how to make PDPs go faster. What was the PDP Improvements
> Project Initiative. Staff can research how these efforts originated.
> The Expedited PDP assumed that certain work could be done, but does
> that satisfy this recommendation? Per the PDP intiative one of the
> changes is that Policy Staff include the draft charters in the
> Preliminary Issue Report. The wording of the recommendation may have
> been overtaken by time. Think about recommending a more formal
> process be undertaken for speeding up PDPs. Perhaps, periodically in
> PDPs to share ideas how it could be speeded up.
>
> _Recommendation 14:_
>
> Question: Should PDP WGs be encouraged to phase or "chunk" PDPs?
>
> Answer: It depends on the PDP, the amount of work, the volunteer
> capacity. It should be encouraged when it works. Classic was the
> Registrar Transfer Policy, currently the RDS PDP broken into 3 phases.
> Should language be added to the PDP Manual to promote phasing?
>
> KPI: How to reword? Staff will address that.
>
> _Recommendations 16&18: _
>
> --Question: Where is the Policy Impact Analysis included?
>
> --Answer: Staff will look into whether a recommendation has been made
> and whether this has been address.
>
> --Question: Does this relate specifically to the outcome of the
> recommendations and the DMPM.
>
> --Answer: Staff will provide additional analysis.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-review-wg mailing list
> Gnso-review-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg
--
Am Steinringer Berg 19
53639 Königswinter
Tel: 02244 873999
Fax: 02244 873955
Mob: 0151 1452 5867
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20170330/98c156d4/attachment.html>
More information about the Gnso-review-wg
mailing list