[Gnso-review-wg] Feedback on Timing of GNSO Review Working Group Calls

[Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben]

Julie,

for me option 1 and 2 would either work, with a slight preference for 
option 2.

The real challenge is bridging the time difference between US Pacific 
coast and Japan. To balance between bad and not so bad times we could 
alternate similar to the GNSO council: once at 1300 UTC and once at 2200 
UTC.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich


Am 16.11.2017 um 21:37 schrieb Julie Hedlund:
>
> Dear GNSO Review Working Group members,
>
> It was noted during the meeting on 15 November that attendance has 
> often been low at WG meetings and not all SGs and Cs have been 
> represented.  The WG noted that this could be a consequence of the 
> timing of the meetings being inconvenient.
>
> Thus, per this action item from the meeting, “Send email to the WG 
> list about the timing of the meeting and inviting feedback about 
> changing the schedule” staff notes that due to the switch from 
> daylight savings time to standard time, the call on 16 November stayed 
> at 1200 UTC, but this caused the call to fall an hour earlier for some 
> time zones, such as at 0700 EST.  We have the option to keep the calls 
> at 1200 UTC, move them to 1300 UTC, or to hold a Doodle poll to find a 
> new day and time for a call.  Please provide feedback on these options 
> below at your earliest convenience, but no later than _Monday, 27 
> November_ to confirm the timing of the call on Thursday, 30 November.  
> You may indicate your preference by placing an “x” mark in front of 
> the preferred option:
>
> _____ Option 1: 1200 UTC on Thursdays bi-weekly
>
> _____ Option 2: 1300 UTC on Thursdays bi-weekly
>
> _____ Option 3: Hold a Doodle Poll
>
> If we don’t receive enough responses to make a conclusive 
> determination on the timing we’ll use the time of 1200 UTC for the 
> call on 30 November but follow up with a Doodle poll for subsequent 
> meetings.
>
> Thank you very much for your assistance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-review-wg mailing list
> Gnso-review-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20171117/2df3d04a/attachment.html>