[Gnso-review-wg] [Ext] Re: GNSO Review Implementation: April Work Plan

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Julie,

the final report is here
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccwg-acct-ws2-annex-1-diversity-final-recs-27mar18-en.pdf


Best,

Rafik

2018-04-13 23:17 GMT+09:00 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>:

> HI Rafik,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your helpful comments.  With respect to diversity, it is
> great to hear that the recommendations have been confirmed by the CCWG.
> Could you point us to the final version of the diversity recommendations?
> Staff can then analyze these against the GNSO Review recommendations.  This
> would help us to develop the implementation charter(s), of course taking
> into account the implementation of the CCWG recommendations.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> *From: *Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, April 13, 2018 at 1:28 AM
> *To: *Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"gnso-review-wg at icann.org" <gnso-review-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Gnso-review-wg] GNSO Review Implementation: April
> Work Plan
>
>
>
> Hi Julie,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the summary and workplan,
>
>
>
>
>
> In addition, the second issue relates to recommendation 20 and the
> suggestion that the scope of the charter for the Standing Committee on
> Budget and Operations (SCBO) could be expanded, so that it is also
> responsible for annually reviewing ICANN’s Strategic Objectives and
> ensuring that the planning of future GNSO activities is in alignment with
> these Strategic Objectives.  This would require approval by the Council,
> and hence would be helpful to have a discussion with the Council about this
> suggestion at one of its meetings.  However, the GNSO Review WG only began
> discussion of the implementation charter for recommendations 20 and 21
> during today’s meeting, and that discussion is anticipated to continue at
> the meeting on 26 April.  So, the issue would not be ready to bring before
> the Council at its next meeting, but could be ready for the May meeting.
>
>
>
>
>
> I guess we can check the current charter for SCBO and its scop. It will be
> reviewed later (I think one of expected tasks from the committee) and it is
> possible to amend it. however, I am wondering if it is the right vehicle
> since we are talking about planning activities and which seems more a
> council remit (the council on its strategical meeting in LA this year
> clearly indicated the focus on managing workload and planning ahead).
> anyway we can discuss this option.
>
>
>
> Thus, in the attached Work Plan staff has suggested that an update would
> be prepared for review by the GNSO Review WG at its meetings on 26 April
> and 09 May, to be submitted by 14 May by the document and motion deadline
> for the Council meeting on 24 May.
>
>
>
> Furthermore, on the remaining recommendations relating to diversity (on
> hold pending the CCWG-Accountability diversity recommendations) and
> statements of interest (on hold pending GDPR) it is anticipated that the
> GNSO Review WG will be ready to provide an update to the GNSO Council at
> its 20 June meeting, so this also is noted in the Work Plan.  Staff will
> determine if motions may be necessary for the implementation of those
> recommendations and will prepare them accordingly.
>
>
>
> for diversity recommendations, they were approved by CCWG in the plenary
> and the WG is currently discussing how to manage the implementation of all
> subgroups recommendations and possible workplan to be made by staff. I am
> wondering if we can resume the work on the charter related to diversity.
>
>  earlier than planned.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/attachments/20180414/c1b6db23/attachment.html>