<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Title content=""><meta name=Keywords content=""><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
/* List Definitions */
@list l0
{mso-list-id:550074096;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:1632282886 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l0:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l0:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l0:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l1
{mso-list-id:1178081119;
mso-list-template-ids:-1879138010;}
@list l2
{mso-list-id:1879464949;
mso-list-type:hybrid;
mso-list-template-ids:468715578 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;}
@list l2:level1
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level2
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level3
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2:level4
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level5
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level6
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
@list l2:level7
{mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level8
{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:left;
text-indent:-.25in;}
@list l2:level9
{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower;
mso-level-tab-stop:none;
mso-level-number-position:right;
text-indent:-9.0pt;}
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
--></style></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Dear GNSO Review Working Group members,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 30 November. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/2017. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Best regards,</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Julie</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div style='border:none;border-bottom:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Julie Hedlund, Policy Director</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt'> </span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Action Items/Discussion Notes 30 November</span></b><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Action Items:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><ol style='margin-top:0in' start=1 type=1><li class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4'><u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Recommendations 26-29</span></u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>: Staff will place this charter implementation on hold pending updates related to GDPR, which will take effect in May 2018.<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4'><u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Recommendation 4</span></u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>: Staff will change text to ICANN59 in July of 2017 (where it currently says ICANN60). Staff will add reference to recognition within the GNSO and internal efforts underway to develop recognition of volunteers throughout the year.<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4'><u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Recommendation 34</span></u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>: Staff will add that there is ongoing assessment by WGs and periodic assessments of attendance by leadership. Staff also will add that when leadership teams and look at effectiveness it may be different for different working groups. Second goal may be to encourage participation from those who may not be participating from that time zone. Rotation, even if it loses attendance from other time zones may still be deemed valuable. It is a bit of a balancing act that the leadership are in the best position to evaluate.<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4'><u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Recommendations 5, 9, 17</span></u><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>: Staff will review language regarding confidentiality of names and will also revisit if text is clear regarding expectations about responses in the survey. Staff will revise recommendations if necessary.<o:p></o:p></span></li><li class=MsoListParagraph style='margin-left:0in;mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4'><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Staff will send out reminder to confirm primary and alternate members. (Done.) <o:p></o:p></span></li></ol><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Notes:<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>1. Review agenda/SOIs: No updates.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>2. Discussion of revised charter for recommendations 26-29:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- These recommendations have been discussed twice previously.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Revisions reflect comments from the last call.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- The strategic alignment does still appear to be correct from a staff perspective.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- One issue raised - the GDPR will be enforced beginning May 2018. Staff added language indicating that the text of these recommendations may need to be revisited with GDPR implementation.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Status of internal discussions around SOIs and compliance with GDPR and other privacy and data protection laws -- no specific proposal with respect to how we ask for SOIs and what goes into the SOIs. An update will be provided by ICANN staff within the next few months, if there will be changes to either element, staff will let the WG know.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Stop gap interim solution - information that is displayed to a person signing up for a Working Group will be updated. It will explain the purpose, need for consent, and what is collected and published. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- When can we expect to need to revisit implementation of this recommendation? Is it enough to mention that there is a relationship between SOIs and GDPR and that additional work may be pending on this issue, or is the WG obliged to revisit the issue?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Recommendation 26, 27: implemented already. Rec 28: Key clauses are already taken to be mandatory. Rec 29: While not currently feasible to include the number of years, upon change to the form, the form could include the requirement of a start date. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Staff entered suggested language that these might need to be revisited. What may change is the content of the form. We don't know at this point. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- We are currently looking at a stop gap that will need a more permanent solution. Hopefully by the next WG call, the language that will be shown to prospective WG members will be available.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- This WG may want to look at what is and is not within scope for the WG.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- The way that recommendations are implemented may change with GDPR, this is something that may be worth flagging to the GNSO Council by this group and others.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>From the chat: <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Marika Konings: One comment in relation to the SOI, following up on Mary's update, at some point it may also need to be considered whether SOIs need to be published publicly without any kind of access control (is that proportional to the purpose?). One could for example consider whether this information is only visible after logging into the wiki space, with clear information available how a log in can be obtained so it is still accessible, but there are some access requirements in place. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Once the impact of GDPR impact is clear, we may want to pick up this charter again (perhaps after May 2018) and see if any updates are needed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- changes to Operating Procedures are in scope for this WG if they are necessary.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Mary Wong: Thanks for clarifying, Julie - that's what I meant about scope, in two respects: specific to the implementation of the current recommendations, and more broadly for the GNSO Operating Procedures.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- This charter will be marked as "on hold" on the wiki.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>3. Discussion of implementation charter for recommendation 4:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- The programs that we currently have did not exist or were just getting started when these recommendations were developed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Two programs: ICANN Community Recognition Program, ICANN Multistakeholder Ethos Award<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Mary Wong: The Community Recognition program spans all officers who are stepping down from SO, AC, SG and Constituency leadership.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- This can be added to the text.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- The GNSO relies on Working Groups to do the main work of the GNSO. Noting that the more people you award the prize, the less valuable the prize, how can we cover more WG participants, leaders, and those who are doing the difficult work in the future?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Staff is evolving the Community Recognition Program to recognize WG participants that may take place throughout the year. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Between now and the next AGM, there will likely be ways to recognize WG volunteers. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Some other forms of recognition exist, for example when a WG is closed, the Council passes a resolution thanking the WG for its work. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>4. Discussion of implementation charter for recommendation 34:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Is this recommendation only focused on effectiveness of the rotation or are there other points?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- The recommendation itself is limited in scope. It is only focused on rotation.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- If it is only focused on this point, may want to add a suggestion for periodic reminder to review rotation. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Text in the scope statement comes from GNSO Review Working Party. There is no definition of effectiveness, but WGs are doing an assessment of effectiveness to see if rotation is working. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Staff may want to add that there is ongoing assessment by WGs and periodic assessments of attendance by leadership. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- When leadership teams and look at effectiveness it may be different for different working groups. Second goal may be to encourage participation from those who may not be participating from that time zone. Rotation, even if it loses attendance from other time zones may still be deemed valuable. It is a bit of a balancing act that the leadership are in the best position to evaluate.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Marika Konings: From a personal experience on the RDS WG, the out of bounds rotation definitely gets a lot less attendance than the 'normal' WG meeting, but the leadership is committed to keeping this rotation to accomodate participants from the Asia-Pacific timezone, regardless of lesser attendance. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Krishna Seeburn - Kris: i've noticed that marika.... i am on the RDS <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Mary Wong: +1 to Marika's observation from the RPM Working Group<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Mary Wong: As Emily is saying, we do, however, get grumbling from either American or European-based folks on rotations that are APAC-friendly, but that is simply a function of the fact that currently WG membership is dominated by volunteers from those regions. That may change in the future,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>5. Discussion of implementation charter for recommendations 5, 9, and 17:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- For the survey, the name is required but it is kept confidential. This field is used to confirm that the individual is a Working Group member.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>From the chat:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Mary Wong: Yes, name is required to make sure the person responding is a WG member in fact. However, the information is kept confidential.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>Marika Konings: Summary information is published but not attributed as far as I recall<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- May want to provide example answers in the survey. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt'>-- Staff will review language regarding confidentiality of names and will also revisit if text is clear regarding expectations about responses in the survey. Staff will revise recommendations if necessary.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>