[Gnso-rpm-documents] FOR REVIEW: Updated summary table of "de novo review" cases

Mary Wong mary.wong at icann.org
Thu Jul 26 02:20:49 UTC 2018 

Dear all,

Staff has now updated the summary table of the 29 cases where a Final Determination was issued (see attached). As confirmed by Renee and David in previous emails, our assumption is that all 29 Final Determination cases refer to those cases where a Response was filed on or after the Default date, but within the permissible 6-month response period.

Statistical summary
Out of the 29 (out of 827) cases where a de novo review occurred:

  *   The Respondent prevailed in 6 cases (meaning the Complainant prevailed in 23).
  *   The Final Determination in 28 cases was rendered in English (the sole exception being one in Spanish).
  *   3 cases saw a Response filed on the same day as the issuance of the Default Determination (and of the 3, 1 saw the Respondent prevail).
  *   2 cases saw a Response filed on the date of Default (with the Complainant prevailing in both cases).
  *   All but one case involving a Chinese registrant saw a Response filed in English (the remaining case saw a blank Response filed).

In the 21 cases where a Final Determination was issued and no Appeal followed (there were Appeals in 2 out of the 23 cases where the Final Determination was in favor of the Complainant):

  *   The Complainant prevailed on all 3 substantive grounds.

In the 2 cases where an Appeal was filed following the Final Determination:

  *   The Complainant prevailed on appeal.

We have updated the Summary Table (attached) to include these statistical points, and we have also included links to all 29 cases. We hope the attachment and the statistical summary are useful, and we will now proceed to prepare a list of possible administrative improvements for the Sub Team’s consideration, based on David McAuley’s report on the call today and the staff observation from reviewing the 29 cases of de novo review.

Thanks and cheers
Mary & Berry

From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 00:44
To: "BECKHAM, Brian" <brian.beckham at wipo.int>, "gnso-rpm-documents at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-documents at icann.org>
Cc: Berry Cobb <Berry.Cobb at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-documents] URS "de novo" and "delay" cases

Hello Brian and everyone,

Just following up on the topic of the number of URS cases where a de novo review occurred, Berry had asked previously what the Sub Team’s understanding is of what that means – for example, the staff understanding had been that the term as used in this PDP referred specifically to those cases where a Default Determination was first issued (since no Response had been filed within the initial 14-day response period), but a Response was then subsequently filed before the permissible 6-month window expired (see, e.g. Section 6.4 of the URS Procedure: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/urs/procedure-01mar13-en.pdf). This understanding would therefore exclude cases where an Appeal occurred (of which we know there were 14 as of end-December 2017) and, of course, also exclude cases where no Response was filed and thus the Default Determination stands.

Staff believes that clarifying this point is essential, especially as it will make a difference to the number of cases to be reviewed under this heading. We will therefore appreciate the Sub Team’s guidance on this point.

In the meantime, and to assist with your review of the cases in this category, staff has gone through and compiled a table (with links to the actual Final Determination) of all the URS cases where a Final Determination (i.e. not a Default or Appeal) was issued and published. You will see from the attached that our count of these cases amounts to 29, with 13 of them showing that both a Default as well as a Final Determination were published. We have also for the present refrained from tagging or using the phrase “de novo review” pending confirmation from the Sub Team.

We hope the attached information and list is useful, especially to David M and Brian who had brought up the topic and for which David had volunteered to assist with the initial review. Please note that we have not had the chance to cross-check all the entries against our other tables and spreadsheets, but in the interests of time we wanted to get the initial table out to the Sub Team for your review and discussion.

Thanks and cheers
Mary, Berry, Julie and Ariel

From: Gnso-rpm-documents <gnso-rpm-documents-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "BECKHAM, Brian" <brian.beckham at wipo.int>
Date: Monday, July 16, 2018 at 11:54
To: "gnso-rpm-documents at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-documents at icann.org>
Cc: Berry Cobb <Berry.Cobb at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-documents] URS "de novo" and "delay" cases

Hi all,

Following on our good call last week, below are the 10 cases in which a “de novo” review was, according to a search on the NAF site, was in play (I believe David McAuley was willing to look at these to see if there were any conclusions to draw):


  *   1554143

wolfram.ceo

Wolfram Group LLC v. Andrew Davis et al.

URS

04/22/2014

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1554143F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=Ck1JR2ueNWMtNQdm5tCVFh8M8TI6CwTzePxTaWWFFgA&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1554143A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=ieRUm6NYgRlezGAC7VO_kApHqYgR3kRMLJl90IBNJlA&e=>

05/06/2014


  *   1563665

lockheed.email, lockheedmartin.email

Lockheed Martin Corporation v. yoyo.email et al.

URS

06/10/2014

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1563665F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=AaPAL6oquBOU6QFCpbvUJb86yqkamt9nQkTcuf4d_e8&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1563665A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=8tlnxoygGxA1kqcfYx2PAYvuElYxYER_0XomHSuZFb4&e=>

08/06/2014


  *   1564796

mwe.email

McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. yoyo.email et al.

URS

06/17/2014

Suspended
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1564796A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=sodkmo_-Sxds69G8jL2Wc5i_p-wk8hL0e9ebu1c6Svc&e=>

08/07/2014


  *   1628473

eos.blackfriday

Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v. North Sound Names et al.

URS

07/13/2015

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1628473F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=zRJpIdUzZVlN04_bCfyN2DHc638pqRGXi9IvpaJn3qg&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1628473A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=ey0EDw5zGxNn2-pdckGFz8V4mRPPSQN1XlWOGjHGS64&e=>

09/13/2015


  *   1637103

tagheuer.digital

LVMH SWISS MANUFACTURES SA v. GiftSMS et al.

URS

09/11/2015

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1637103F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=-W6fI09_K72GaGaulFxnm7F39IK0VNZ7Lur6BVr5sMA&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1637103A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=lwlm8fw_bnT38nUkEFbgrgs5ueCNFof6gJN0VTSJII8&e=>

11/23/2015


  *   1672049

sanofi.xin

SANOFI v. 苏威 et al.

URS

04/26/2016

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1672049F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=Bk8A89Uk3pdwhLvIM8w5ZN6kQt9W61X6QFb1fPGQUKk&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1672049A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=7Y9IykJMJnclVp2rPb-B0UpsHELCS8mUm2t5gdYS4g0&e=>

06/28/2016


  *   1673323

brandchannel.xyz, interbrand.club

Interbrand Group v. WhoisGuard, Inc. et al.

URS

05/06/2016

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1673323F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=4q6QVl248TaPu_OIdIRTl_M5xUTdhY0g1VT_7Q43LYk&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1673323A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=l2tzkNDqS7WwTHrGwJwnIIE6AltuspiNZCvN9WRQVOw&e=>

06/15/2016


  *   1681062

grey.email

Grey Global Group LLC v. i-content Ltd. et al.

URS

06/27/2016

Claim Denied
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1681062F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=0ackbpHXSZm3u4kv3a55QLHncn1jZ2OntPw5mEzsxjE&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1681062A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=7Wxs_ipyLQpGKVksas_mjHsyzn0Dab7JXPqd-VJXa8Y&e=>

08/10/2016


  *   1716444

greubel-forsey.watch

GFPI S.A. v. Michael Meyer et al.

URS

02/08/2017

Suspended
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1716444F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=kIap6ccXmAG1DQhvmiE64iBIJK3rEauzGBba_txw01g&e=>
Appeal [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1716444A.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=bSi0WM2fk_OyJG5Du_BrrM-VA0AHO1EQW-v0FWA0guM&e=>

03/23/2017


  *   1760252

virginmobile.top

Virgin Enterprises Limited v. Zhu Jie et al.

URS

11/30/2017

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1760252D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=uvMj4B4RkA1aWMxovVjYEKgUEykDOn-FfJypokQZvOs&e=>
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1760252F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=asAQRN7MGdNGhsO9C4z6w_QCQG1EBeTTJzrT40UOQ2k&e=>

01/19/2018


Also, FYI – to recall there were no cases where “laches” appeared and 6 (pasted below) where “delay” appeared:

  *   1587022

holidayinn.wang

Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. hong yong et al.

URS

10/29/2014

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1587022D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=j5mJ1TFZUZS68iD4O-JPo1c-Qp-vzlLe2qkbIbFWSl4&e=>
Final [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1587022F.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=636Oj2tNHWPBjjSQzajjXz5V7iphq2svQPZvNmOM9mU&e=>

11/24/2014


  *   1592905

porsche.kaufen, porsche-design.kaufen

Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v. visucom ag et al.

URS

12/03/2014

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1592905D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=p2oRpwxBq87NI5hnPvesnkRRPROuwoOqiChVbx1gFzY&e=>

12/22/2014


  *   1613317

bankofthewest.money

Bank of the West, N.A. v. Peter Keating

URS

04/08/2015

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1613317D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=MM7ngMHdAOoA6-zXrDz8PMU6DH9XwMZC-IsLcpqkAY8&e=>

04/27/2015


  *   1620565

urbanoutfitters.sale

Urban Outfitters, Inc v. Domain Administrator

URS

05/28/2015

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1620565D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=SsowlE1QJPKf7iWITBKBLdIHfjanMnRPSGwowc06Qtw&e=>

06/17/2015


  *   1636250

fxcm.top

Forex Capital Markets LLC v. zechuan chang

URS

09/08/2015

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1636250D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=uXoVAnRI2V9yQaKewvfLxveVA96dgOrBL6jONK9nmgY&e=>

09/28/2015


  *   1734989

schneider-electric.store

SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE v. Private Person

URS

06/08/2017

Suspended
Default [adrforum.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1734989D.htm&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=22iPf1VPwFXMoqnPd99LQi8yJPzbIpO9AXSpWt2ObbM&e=>

06/28/2017


Best,

Brian



[The image of the 2018 GII cover shows crashing waves captured within the outline of a battery cell, representing the raw power of innovation.][wipo.int]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wipo.int_gii_-3Futm-5Fsource-3Dwipomail-26utm-5Fmedium-3Dsignature-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dgii2018&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=EHCS-mdYrr4FTYxICDHh3SCZ9m2NJ6EXUQ6YWSlfARY&e=>



GLOBAL
INNOVATION
INDEX 2018






Energizing the World with Innovation






Launch July 10

www.wipo.int/gii [wipo.int]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.wipo.int_gii_-3Futm-5Fsource-3Dwipomail-26utm-5Fmedium-3Dsignature-26utm-5Fcampaign-3Dgii2018&d=DwMFbw&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=pIQ7zW04FsDGr92saGFnCEfMzMUMjdRw9jlc9HudlC0&s=EHCS-mdYrr4FTYxICDHh3SCZ9m2NJ6EXUQ6YWSlfARY&e=>

#GII2018





World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-documents/attachments/20180726/8586717c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Summary Table - URS Final Determination Cases as of Dec 2017 - UPDATED 25 July 2018.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 38856 bytes
Desc: Summary Table - URS Final Determination Cases as of Dec 2017 - UPDATED 25 July 2018.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-documents/attachments/20180726/8586717c/SummaryTable-URSFinalDeterminationCasesasofDec2017-UPDATED25July2018-0001.docx>

More information about the Gnso-rpm-documents mailing list