[Gnso-rpm-documents] URS "delay" cases research

[BECKHAM, Brian]

Thanks Renee for the clarification, and sorry to miss you last night.

Since your search found no "delay" results, that affirms me in thinking (copied from below):

"In fact, on reflection, given that new gTLDs have launched from 2014 to the present, it is difficult to make a case for invoking the "delay" doctrine at all in URS cases so far.

I suggest this is a useful data point for our consideration."

Brian

From: Fossen, Renee [mailto:rfossen at adrforum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 9:20 PM
To: BECKHAM, Brian; gnso-rpm-documents at icann.org
Subject: RE: URS "delay" cases research

Hi Brian/Sub-Team,

My apologies for not making the call today.

With respect to your email below, there was a bug in the web search.  It is my understanding that the issue has been resolved, but testing continues to make sure.  I ran the search just a few minutes ago with no results for the word "delay."

Kind regards,

Renee


Renee Fossen
Director of Arbitration

Forum
6465 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 480
Minneapolis, MN  55405
Phone  952.516.6456
E-mail  rfossen at adrforum.com<mailto:rfossen at adrforum.com>
www.adrforum.com



From: Gnso-rpm-documents [mailto:gnso-rpm-documents-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of BECKHAM, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 9:54 AM
To: gnso-rpm-documents at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-documents] URS "delay" cases research

All,

In advance of our call today, please see the attached.  In sum, it is not clear why these came up in a search on the provider's website for "delay" as the term was not in any of the cases (I have re-run the search several times, and had a colleague do the same, including in different browsers).

In either event, some of the cases were filed the same month as the DDN was registered, and the longest stretch was one year.

None of these would not fall into what would be considered a "delay" in filing type scenario.

In fact, on reflection, given that new gTLDs have launched from 2014 to the present, it is difficult to make a case for invoking the "delay" doctrine at all in URS cases so far.

I suggest this is a useful data point for our consideration.

Brian

Brian Beckham | Head, Internet Dispute Resolution Section | WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center
34 chemin des Colombettes, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland | T +4122 338 8247 | E brian.beckham at wipo.int<mailto:brian.beckham at wipo.int> | www.wipo.int<http://www.wipo.int/>



[Image removed by sender. The image of the 2018 GII cover shows crashing waves captured within the outline of a battery cell, representing the raw power of innovation.]<http://www.wipo.int/gii/?utm_source=wipomail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=gii2018>



GLOBAL
INNOVATION
INDEX 2018






Energizing the World with Innovation






Launch July 10

www.wipo.int/gii<http://www.wipo.int/gii/?utm_source=wipomail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=gii2018>

#GII2018





World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-documents/attachments/20180726/ac1aaa89/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 410 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-documents/attachments/20180726/ac1aaa89/image001.jpg>