[Gnso-rpm-practitioner] FINAL-Draft Questions for Practitioners

Fri Apr 13 23:16:30 UTC 2018

Dear all,

Further to the email below, and based on the discussion during the RPM Practitioners Sub Team call on 11 April, please see the attached final draft of the questions for practitioners.  The final draft will be sent by the Working Group Co-Chairs to the full Working Group early next week for discussion during the Working Group call on Wednesday, 18 April.

Thank you very much.

Kind regards,

Julie

From: Gnso-rpm-practitioner <gnso-rpm-practitioner-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 1:23 PM
To: "gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-practitioner] FOR REVIEW: Draft Questions for Practitioners

Dear all,

Per the notes below from the meeting on 28 March, a small group of volunteer editors was established to prioritize, consolidate, and edit the questions for practitioners.  Accordingly, please see attached in Word and PDF the draft of the questions for your review and discussion at our next Sub Team call on Wednesday, 11 April at 1700 UTC.

The volunteers advise the Sub Team that this new version takes into account comments from ICANN61 and the last working group call.   The volunteers’ work streamlined and restructured the original rough, free flow of questions into a more user friendly presentation to encourage response and allow the Sub Team to obtain useful data.  Questions were structured to provide a multiple choice answer format, and where it appeared necessary (or advisable), additional supporting information is requested to provide context for the answer.

It will be helpful if all Sub Team members could review the draft questions in advance of Wednesday’s call.  If you have comments, suggested edits, and questions you are encouraged to post these to the list in advance of the call and staff will gather them for Wednesday’s discussion.

Best,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

From: Gnso-rpm-practitioner <gnso-rpm-practitioner-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 2:20 PM
To: "gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-practitioner at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-practitioner] Action & Notes: RPM Sub Team for URS Practitioners call on Wednesday, 28 March 2018 18:00 UTC

Dear all,

Below are the action items and notes staff captured from the RPM Sub Team for URS Practitioners meeting today (28 March 2018).  The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording and attendance records.  See: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-02-28+Sub+Team+for+URS+Practitioners. 

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Action Items:

Staff will provide a link to a Google Doc for Group of Editors (Georges, Scott, Petter, and Jason) to prioritize, consolidate, and edits the questions.  DONE – See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sobXBGnVZV9zKazKvq5Nf2QtDo4-u1hmpieh4xB_fe8/edit?usp=sharing 
The Group of Editors will provide the revised list of questions to the full Sub Team by Monday, 09 April for review and discussion on the all on 11 April.  The Group of Editors will use the meeting slot on Wednesday, 04 April at 1700 UTC.

Notes:

1. Questions for Practitioners:

-- Constructive suggestions from the full WG at ICANN61.

-- Get the questions into better organization.

-- Edit the tone of the questions

-- Reorganize the questions – perhaps have some more substantive questions and sub questions.

-- Get the questions into shape and then consider how to reduce the volume.

-- What is the goal here and how do we achieve it?  Open-ended questions may not get us anywhere.

-- Include a final open comment box.

-- How to manage the edits – look for volunteers for each section?  What are we trying to get?  Try to get down to 10 manageable topics and questions related to them.  Also, figure out what kind of answer we are looking for.  Use click boxes to reduce questions.

-- How to prioritize and edit the questions?  Get volunteers to edit: Scott Austin, Georges Nahitchevansky, Petter Rindforth, and Jason Schaeffer; the goal is for the group of editors to present the revised draft questions to the Practitioners Sub Team by April 9th.

Questions from Documents Sub Team:

-- Note that there also are the suggested questions from the Documents Sub Team.  

-- How do we synthesize these?  

-- They all seem to seek anecdotal responses.  Seems like a set of suggestions.  Questions need to be more precise.  

-- Look for gaps between what we cover and they have suggested.

-- Once we edit our questions it may be easier to synthesize them with the Documents Sub Team questions.

2. List of Practitioners: How many do we contact?  Do we have different questions for different practitioners and level of experience?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-practitioner/attachments/20180413/2d842ca0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FINAL-Draft Questions for Practitioners 13 April 2018.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 42753 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-practitioner/attachments/20180413/2d842ca0/FINAL-DraftQuestionsforPractitioners13April2018-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-practitioner/attachments/20180413/2d842ca0/smime-0001.p7s>