[Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC

[Justine Chew]

Just spotted another typo:-

*Further Statement*

1. Have you acted ...(not Have your acted....)

Thanks,

Justine
-----

On 18 April 2018 at 23:10, Justine Chew <justine.chew at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Sub-team colleagues, Ariel,
>
> I have spotted a couple of typographical errors which ought to be
> corrected:-
>
> *Under Examiner*
>
> 6, Do you undertake any independent inquiries to adequately satisfy
> yourself *of your Examiners' impartiality and independence*? Or do you
> rely solely upon the oath or declaration made by each Examiner?
>
> 7. (To FORUM and MFSD) Has any of your Examiner*s* voluntarily disclose*d*
> any conflict of interest? If not, then what action was taken upon discovery
> of any conflict? If a conflict was disclosed, did the Examiner do this
> before and/or during the case proceeding?
>
> ​Thanks,
>
> Justine
> -----
>
> On 18 April 2018 at 00:14, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> [Message sent on behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs]
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear WG members:
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find attached documents generated by the Sub Teams on
>> Practitioners, and on Providers. There is a short description of each
>> document below. These documents will be the presented by the Sub Team
>> Chairs and serve as the main focus of our discussion on tomorrow’s WG call
>> (Wed, 18 April at 17:00-18:30 UTC), with an aim to approving final versions
>> expeditiously so that they can be sent out and responded to as soon as
>> possible.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Providers Sub Team:*
>>
>> *1. Consolidated Questions to URS Providers*
>>
>> *2. Responses to Propose Questions to URS Providers: *
>>
>> -- The document includes responses already received from Providers during
>> ICANN61 presentation and follow-up emails, as well as responses provided by
>> staff research per Sub Team requests;
>>
>> -- Questions partially responded by Providers are also included in the
>> document to show why these questions are directed to specific Provider(s)
>>
>>
>>
>> *Practitioners Sub Team:* *URS Practitioner Background Experience and
>> Perspective*
>>
>>
>>
>> Considerable work has gone into these documents and we thank the Sub
>> Teams for their time, effort and care. As Co-Chairs, we urge that edits be
>> proposed with great care, as balances were carefully considered by the Sub
>> Teams.
>>
>>
>>
>> A separate URS Documents Sub Team Summary Report being edited by Brian
>> Beckham will be provided shortly. Time-allowing, we will consider this
>> Summary Report tomorrow, otherwise, on 4/25.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best to all,
>>
>> Philip & Kathy
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie
>> Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
>> *Date: *Friday, April 13, 2018 at 2:20 PM
>> *To: *"gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
>> *Subject: *[gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on
>> 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear RPM PDP WG members,
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is the proposed agenda for the Working Group call Wednesday, 18
>> April 2018, scheduled for 1700 UTC:
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposed Agenda:
>>
>>    1. Roll call (via WebEx and phone bridge only); updates to Statements
>>    of Interest
>>    2. Status reports - with specific recommendations for next steps and
>>    timeline - from the three URS Sub Teams (Documents, Practitioners,
>>    Providers)
>>    3. Discussion/agreement on next steps for the three URS Sub Teams in
>>    view of the current Phase One timeline
>>    4. Notice of agenda for 25 April meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180418/1ad24f59/attachment-0001.html>