[Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC

Corwin, Philip pcorwin at verisign.com
Wed Apr 18 16:22:42 UTC 2018


Now I see that Ariel yesterday sent us three GDD responses.



Let’s consider what to do with those after today’s call.



Philip S. Corwin

Policy Counsel

VeriSign, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

703-948-4648/Direct

571-342-7489/Cell



"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Corwin, Philip via Gnso-rpm-providers
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:55 AM
To: justine.chew at gmail.com
Cc: gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC



Not sure. Can staff advise on what of any responses we have or expect to receive from GDD?



Philip S. Corwin

Policy Counsel

VeriSign, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

703-948-4648/Direct

571-342-7489/Cell



"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



From: Justine Chew [mailto:justine.chew at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:53 AM
To: Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com<mailto:pcorwin at verisign.com>>
Cc: ariel.liang at icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang at icann.org>; gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC



Phil,

May I ask, what might you / we propose as a course of action to deal with any impact the GDD responses might have on the questions to the Providers? Since we didn't have an opportunity to consider those during a sub-team call.




Thanks,

Justine
-----



On 18 April 2018 at 23:33, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin at verisign.com<mailto:pcorwin at verisign.com>> wrote:

   Thanks for the diligence



   Philip S. Corwin

   Policy Counsel

   VeriSign, Inc.

   12061 Bluemont Way<https://maps.google.com/?q=12061+Bluemont+Way+%0D%0AReston,+VA+20190&entry=gmail&source=g>
   Reston, VA 20190

   703-948-4648/Direct

   571-342-7489/Cell



   "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



   From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Justine Chew
   Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:20 AM
   To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang at icann.org>>; gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>
   Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC



   Just spotted another typo:-



   Further Statement

   1. Have you acted ...(not Have your acted....)




   Thanks,

   Justine
   -----



   On 18 April 2018 at 23:10, Justine Chew <justine.chew at gmail.com<mailto:justine.chew at gmail.com>> wrote:

      Dear Sub-team colleagues, Ariel,

      I have spotted a couple of typographical errors which ought to be corrected:-

      Under Examiner

      6, Do you undertake any independent inquiries to adequately satisfy yourself of your Examiners' impartiality and independence? Or do you rely solely upon the oath or declaration made by each Examiner?

      7. (To FORUM and MFSD) Has any of your Examiners voluntarily disclosed any conflict of interest? If not, then what action was taken upon discovery of any conflict? If a conflict was disclosed, did the Examiner do this before and/or during the case proceeding?



      ​Thanks,


      Justine
      -----



      On 18 April 2018 at 00:14, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang at icann.org>> wrote:

         [Message sent on behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs]



         Dear WG members:



         Please find attached documents generated by the Sub Teams on Practitioners, and on Providers. There is a short description of each document below. These documents will be the presented by the Sub Team Chairs and serve as the main focus of our discussion on tomorrow’s WG call (Wed, 18 April at 17:00-18:30 UTC), with an aim to approving final versions expeditiously so that they can be sent out and responded to as soon as possible.



         Providers Sub Team:

         1. Consolidated Questions to URS Providers

         2. Responses to Propose Questions to URS Providers:

         -- The document includes responses already received from Providers during ICANN61 presentation and follow-up emails, as well as responses provided by staff research per Sub Team requests;

         -- Questions partially responded by Providers are also included in the document to show why these questions are directed to specific Provider(s)



         Practitioners Sub Team: URS Practitioner Background Experience and Perspective



         Considerable work has gone into these documents and we thank the Sub Teams for their time, effort and care. As Co-Chairs, we urge that edits be proposed with great care, as balances were carefully considered by the Sub Teams.



         A separate URS Documents Sub Team Summary Report being edited by Brian Beckham will be provided shortly. Time-allowing, we will consider this Summary Report tomorrow, otherwise, on 4/25.



         Best to all,

         Philip & Kathy



         From: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>
         Date: Friday, April 13, 2018 at 2:20 PM
         To: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>
         Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC



         Dear RPM PDP WG members,



         Here is the proposed agenda for the Working Group call Wednesday, 18 April 2018, scheduled for 1700 UTC:



         Proposed Agenda:

         1.     Roll call (via WebEx and phone bridge only); updates to Statements of Interest
         2.     Status reports - with specific recommendations for next steps and timeline - from the three URS Sub Teams (Documents, Practitioners, Providers)
         3.     Discussion/agreement on next steps for the three URS Sub Teams in view of the current Phase One timeline
         4.     Notice of agenda for 25 April meeting



         Best regards,

         Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry







         _______________________________________________
         gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
         gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180418/a6914f26/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-rpm-providers mailing list