[Gnso-rpm-providers] [Ext] RE: Follow-up Questions to Providers & Other Sources

[Ariel Liang]

Hello Phil and all,

Yes, that is correct. In the interest of time, the follow-up questions have been sent to the Providers and ICANN GDD.

Staff’s understanding is that we needed to send the follow-up questions as quickly as possible and did not realize that you wanted to review them. The areas for follow-up and which Provider to follow up with are also noted in the “Suggested List of Issues for Discussion – URS Providers Survey” document, which was circulated last Monday. Since no input was received on these points, staff went ahead and developed these follow-up questions based on our observation and understanding.

We are happy to clarify if necessary, and if URS Providers have any confusion/question.

Thank you,
Mary, Julie, Ariel, and Berry

From: "Corwin, Philip" <pcorwin at verisign.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 6:42 PM
To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-rpm-providers] Follow-up Questions to Providers & Other Sources

Ariel:

Based on your email it appears that the questions to Providers have already gone out. Is that correct?

There are a few instances where I think the questions could have been more clearly worded, or where it might have been beneficial to ask all providers rather than just select ones. It would have been useful to have been able to review this prior to the transmission of the questions.

Philip

Philip S. Corwin
Policy Counsel
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
703-948-4648/Direct
571-342-7489/Cell

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2018 7:09 PM
To: gnso-rpm-providers at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-rpm-providers] Follow-up Questions to Providers & Other Sources

Dear Providers Sub Team members,

With support from the Co-Chair, staff have developed a list of follow up questions to URS Providers and other sources, including ICANN GDD, registries, and registers. Please find the list of follow-up questions attached.

The follow-up questions were developed based on staff’s observation and understanding of the Sub Team’s review of the Providers’ responses. The row numbers in the chart corresponds to the row numbers in the spreadsheet of Providers’ responses [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spreadsheets_d_1I-2Dqe-5FI4OkQT7IU-5FrjHMQVa9Ebj8Ik6vay1vr5Yt9ZIg_edit-3Fusp-3Dsharing&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dRzB-YypMqj9AZjlP_sZHORJtVF4M6AI0vip1lbQy10&m=RT93CZEiQZnlzgvAWUkdf4vN5eRABPeBupDgzIo_iXA&s=-nPHWIepCEt3XTy03NIw8VarB5fxzHYtr81mMr2zXcs&e=>. The target for the question is indicated with “x”.

Please note the questions/draft emails to registries and/or registrars, which are highlighted in yellow, will not be sent out now. The reason is that the TMCH Sunrise & Claims surveys will be distributed to the registries and registrars next week. Additional questions related to the URS Providers issue may distract them from the TMCH surveys and hinder the response rate.

In the interest of time, staff will be sending these questions to URS Providers and ICANN GDD now and request them to respond within two weeks (by Monday, 20 August). We hope their swift response would help facilitate the WG deliberation on issues identified by the Sub Team.

Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel, Berry


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-providers/attachments/20180807/4a4905af/attachment-0001.html>