[Gnso-rpm-sunrise] Action Items from Sunrise Registration Sub Team Call - 19 May 2017

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi All,

Given that the chair is absent, serious questions were raised in the 
last meeting about changes to many questions, and the previous versions 
of the tables have not yet been circulated (#8 below), I would recommend 
this subteam NOT meet this week. I think it would be a much better use 
of time to wait until we are all together again - and have the benefit 
of the documents below.

Hope everyone is having a great time in Barcelona!  The photos coming in 
are beautiful!

Best, Kathy


On 5/23/2017 10:40 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>
> Dear Sub Team Members,
>
> Apologies for the late delivery on this, but please find below the 
> action items from Friday’s call. The action items, notes, document, 
> recordings and transcripts of the call are posted on the Sub Team’s 
> meeting wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/DxHfAw
>
> Thanks, and again, apologies about the delay.
>
> Amr
>
> Action Items:
>
> 1. To cover concerns to registrants, Sub Team to suggest possible 
> rewording of Question 1, batching it with other questions, or possibly 
> suggest an additional question
>
> 2. Sub Team to follow up with Lori Schulman on data (examples) to 
> answer Proposed Final Question 2 provided in the INTA survey 
> results/report
>
> 3. Sub Team to consider adding a fourth bullet to Proposed Final 
> Question 2 on registry operator practices other than pricing of 
> Sunrise registrations and Premium Names, which may have a deterrent 
> effect on brand owners’ use of Sunrise
>
> 4. Sub Team to follow up on outstanding action item regarding 
> definitions for Premium Names, Reserved Names and Premium Sunrise 
> Pricing on the mailing list
>
> 5. Sub Team to consider rewording of Proposed Final Question 3 to 
> reflect that the effect on both trademark holders and registry 
> operators needs to be considered, when discussing the impact on 
> geoTLDs and QLPs when reserved names are registered in the TMCH
>
> 6. Sub Team to revise Final Proposed Questions (such as Final Proposed 
> Question 4) to ensure that they incorporate the original Charter 
> questions, and are asking questions that are practically answerable
>
> 7. Sub Team to look over the Proposed Final Question 6, which 
> addresses the intended effect and effectiveness of Sunrise, and 
> consider if it requires further refinement
>
> 8. Staff to circulate previous versions and current version of the 
> google doc tables, so that Sub Team can track changes made
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-sunrise mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-sunrise at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-sunrise

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/attachments/20170524/ed46f94a/attachment.html>