[Gnso-rpm-sunrise] [Discussion Thread] Sunrise Q4

Ariel Liang ariel.liang at icann.org
Thu Apr 18 15:48:43 UTC 2019


Dear Sunrise Sub Team members,



As announced, this thread is being opened for final mailing list discussions related to Sunrise Agreed Charter Question 4.


We ask that you review the Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019) and provide any additional input you may have to the “tentative answers & preliminary recommendations” in relation to the Agreed Charter Question.


Unless the Sub Team Co-Chairs determine otherwise, this discussion thread will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 15 May 2019. Comments/input provided past the closing date or outside this discussion thread will not be taken into account when compiling the final Sub Team member input.


Summary Table (Pages 20-24)

The draft answers, preliminary recommendations, and links to the relevant individual proposals are in the latest Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019):

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138618/%5BSunrise%20Summary%20Table%5D%20%2816%20April%202019%29.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1555515624235&api=v2.

Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 4 (Pages 20-21)
The Sub Team discussed Agreed Charter Question 4 on 10 April 2019 but did not develop tentative answers or preliminary recommendations, hence the proposed answers are “TBD”. The Sub Team continued the discussion on 17 April 2019. Based on the Sub Team’s discussions, the transcript and notes, staff will provide update via this discussion thread.

(a) Are Registry Operator Reserved Names practices unfairly limiting participation in Sunrise by trademark owners?

Proposed Answer: TBD

(b) Should Section 1.3.3 of Specification 1 of the Registry Agreement be modified to address these concerns?

Proposed Answer: TBD

(c) Should Registry Operators be required to publish their Reserved Names lists -- what Registry concerns would be raised by that publication, and what problem(s) would it solve?

Proposed Answer: TBD

(d) Should Registry Operators be required to provide trademark owners in the TMCH notice, and the opportunity to register, the domain name should the Registry Operator release it – what Registry concerns would be raised by this requirement?

Proposed Answer: TBD

Individual Proposal
As noted by Kristine Dorrain, Individual Proposal #11 is more relevant to Sunrise Q3. Please discuss Individual Proposal #11 in the discussion thread for Sunrise Q3.


Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/attachments/20190418/e9fb3306/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-rpm-sunrise mailing list