[Gnso-rpm-sunrise] CLOSED: [Discussion Thread] Sunrise Q1

[Ariel Liang]

Dear Sunrise Sub Team members,

In the absence of further discussions and per Sub Team Co-Chairs’ determination, the Discussion Thread for the Trademark Claims Agreed Charter Question 1 (including Proposal #9) is now closed.

Specifically, Sub Team Co-Chairs note that while Proposal #9 did not seem to receive wide support from the Sub Team, its relevant aspect has been picked up in the discussion thread for the agreed Sunrise Charter Question 6. Please reference that discussion thread for further information.

Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel

From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
Date: Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 7:49 AM
To: "gnso-rpm-sunrise at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise at icann.org>
Subject: [Discussion Thread] Sunrise Q1


Dear Sunrise Sub Team members,


As announced, this thread is being opened for final mailing list discussions related to Sunrise Agreed Charter Question 1, including Proposal #9.


We ask that you review the Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019) and provide any additional input you may have to the “tentative answers & preliminary recommendations” in relation to the Agreed Charter Question, and consider draft answers to the following questions regarding the individual proposal:
a. Should the Sub Team recommend that the full WG consider including this Individual Proposal in the Initial Report for the solicitation of public comment?
b. In light of the Individual Proposal, are any modifications to the current “tentative answers & preliminary recommendations” needed?
c. Should any additional Sub Team recommendations be made in relation to the agreed Sunrise charter question?


Unless the Sub Team Co-Chairs determine otherwise, this discussion thread will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 15 May 2019. Comments/input provided past the closing date or outside this discussion thread will not be taken into account when compiling the final Sub Team member input.


Summary Table (Pages 8-12)

The draft answers, preliminary recommendations, and links to the relevant individual proposals are in the latest Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019): https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138618/%5BSunrise Summary Table%5D %2816 April 2019%29.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1555515624235&api=v2

Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 1 (Page 8)
Q1(a) Should the availability of Sunrise registrations only for identical matches be reviewed?
Proposed Answer: The availability of Sunrise registrations only for identical matches should not be reviewed.

Q1(b) If the matching process is expanded, how can Registrant free expression and fair use rights be protected and balanced against trademark rights?
Proposed Answer: The matching process should not be expanded.


Individual Proposals

The Sub Team just discussed the Proposal #9 on 24 April 2019, hence there is no draft answer currently on the Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019). Based on the Sub Team’s discussions, the transcript and notes, staff will provide update via this discussion thread.



Link to the individual proposal is included below.

Proposal #9: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102146375/Proposal%239.pdf?api=v2


Where to Find All Discussion Threads
Access the Documents wiki page and find the opening messages of the all discussion threads in the table (highlighted in green): https://community.icann.org/x/_oIWBg




Best Regards,

Mary, Julie, Ariel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/attachments/20190517/406026b6/attachment.html>