[Gnso-rpm-sunrise] [Discussion Thread] Sunrise Q5(b)

[Ariel Liang]

Dear Sunrise Sub Team members,



As announced, this thread is being opened for final mailing list discussions related to Sunrise Agreed Charter Question 5(b), including Proposal #7.

We ask that you review the Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019) and provide any additional input you may have to the “proposed answers & preliminary recommendations” in relation to the Agreed Charter Question, and consider draft answers to the following questions regarding the individual proposal:
a. Should the Sub Team recommend that the full WG consider including this Individual Proposal in the Initial Report for the solicitation of public comment?
b. In light of the Individual Proposal, are any modifications to the current “tentative answers & preliminary recommendations” needed?
c. Should any additional Sub Team recommendations be made in relation to the agreed Sunrise charter question?


Unless the Sub Team Co-Chairs determine otherwise, this discussion thread will remain open until 23:59 UTC on 29 May 2019. Comments/input provided past the closing date or outside this discussion thread will not be taken into account when compiling the final Sub Team member input.


Summary Table (Pages 26-29)

The draft answers, preliminary recommendations, and links to the relevant individual proposals are in the latest Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019):

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138618/%5BSunrise%20Summary%20Table%5D%20%2816%20April%202019%29.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1555515624235&api=v2.

Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 5(b)
The Sub Team just discussed Agreed Preamble Charter Question on 22 May 2019, hence the proposed answers are “TBD”. Based on the Sub Team’s discussions, the transcript and notes, staff will provide update.

Q5(b): In light of evidence gathered above, should the Sunrise Period continue to be mandatory or become optional?
Proposed Answer: TBD


Q5(b)(i): Should the WG consider returning to the original recommendation from the IRT and STI of Sunrise Period OR Trademark Claims in light of other concerns, including freedom of expression and fair use?
Proposed Answer: TBD

Q5(b)(ii): In considering mandatory vs optional, should Registry Operators be allowed to choose between Sunrise and Claims (that is, make ONE mandatory)?
Proposed Answer: TBD



Individual Proposal

The Sub Team just discussed the Proposal #7 on 22 May 2019, hence there is no draft answer currently on the Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019). Based on the Sub Team’s discussions, the transcript and notes, staff will provide update.



Link to the individual proposal is included below.
Proposal #7: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102146375/Proposal%237.pdf?api=v2

Where to Find All Discussion Threads
Access the Documents wiki page and find the opening messages of the all discussion threads in the table (highlighted in green): https://community.icann.org/x/_oIWBg



Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/attachments/20190523/3a0501a4/attachment-0001.html>