<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Tx Claudio for posting. I support Greg's suggestion of getting
input from the subteam on this proposal. <br>
</p>
<p>This is a policy recommendation -- and would be going out to the
Community for public comment as such in our Initial Report.
Claudio, as you have shared below, key questions have been raised
-- including definitional and structural ones. They have not been
answered or addressed. Unfortunately, I don't think this proposal
is ready for primetime, and would benefit from the process we have
set out for review of individual proposals (and incorporation of
some of the feedback already received).</p>
<p>Best, Kathy (in my personal capacity)<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/17/2019 3:34 PM, claudio di gangi
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAFbYrLQGyFf1EgPHrTg6oi0f828KRDp4RHyMoF70yPaM0hu6kQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Thanks very much for this Ariel.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>David, Greg,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In reading #2 below, I’m a little confused on status.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>After presenting the proposal, I started making changes to
address the input received on that call. I wasn’t on the chat
that day, but I was under the impression that a number of sub
team members supported the proposal in principle, but another
segment (Kathy, Kristine, Maxim, and Zak) expressed questions or
concerns, some related to policy and some related to
implementation. This is the reason why I thought it might be
worth the effort to make modifications.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>However, in the process of consulting with stakeholders, I
received several recommendations that it would be helpful to
post the proposal for public comment in the initial report - not
as a Policy Recommendation, but to help flesh out the issues in
greater detail and to obtain more perspective on community views
(since a similar recommendation was submitted to us from another
PDP).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is it appropriately under the sub team’s remit to consider
proceeding in this direction, i.e. to consider recommending to
the plenary that we post the proposal for public comment? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div>Claudio<br>
<br>
On Friday, May 17, 2019, Ariel Liang <<a
href="mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org" moz-do-not-send="true">ariel.liang@icann.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Sunrise Sub Team members, </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">On behalf of the Sub Team Co-Chairs,
staff are sending this message following up on the
discussion about Proposal #9 in the context of the
agreed Sunrise Charter Question 6. Please note that
Proposal #9 is closely related to the agreed Sunrise
Charter Question 1. Its relevant aspect has been picked
up in this discussion thread due to connection with the
SubPro PDP Working Group’s referral.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Sub Team Co-Chairs propose to
include the following in the Sub Team’s report to the
full Working Group at the end of its deliberation:
</p>
<ol style="margin-top:0in" start="1" type="1">
<li style="margin-left:0in">The SubPro PDP Working Group
referred a question about “dot-span trademarks” to the
RPM Working Group with a request that it be considered
as part of the RPM work.
</li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black">Proposal #9 is
similar to the SubPro referral, but it did not garner
the “wide support” necessary to become a Sub Team
preliminary recommendation. This has been noted in the
Discussion Thread Q1, which is now closed. <span
style="font-size:12.0pt"></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="color:black">The Sub Team
Co-Chairs suggest that the RPM & Sunrise Sub Team
chairs respond to the SubPro referral, thanking them
for the referral and confirming that the issue was
discussed.
<span style="font-size:12.0pt"></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The discussion thread for Q6 will
remain open pending additional comments. In the absence
of further discussions, it will be closed shortly per
Sub Team Co-Chairs’ determination.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best Regards,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mary, Julie, Ariel </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">claudio di
gangi <<a href="mailto:ipcdigangi@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ipcdigangi@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 8:04 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"McAuley, David" <<a
href="mailto:dmcauley@verisign.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">dmcauley@verisign.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Ariel Liang <<a
href="mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">ariel.liang@icann.org</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Ext] Re: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise]
[Discussion Thread] Sunrise Q6</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear David, Greg, all,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In light of today's discussion
during our sub team meeting, I would like to request
that we: (1) withhold further consideration of the
Spanning the Dot Sunrise topic for the time being,
(2) post the issue for Public Comment in the initial
report, and (3) then consider the input received at
the plenary level. </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">More specifically, we can include
a set of questions designed to solicit public
feedback on the policy and operational issues that
may arise with the implementation of a Spanning the
Dot Sunrise. I am happy to assist in developing
those questions with other interested sub team
members, which we can base on the transcript from
the Sub team meeting when we discussed this topic
last month.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On a personal level, I do not
feel comfortable making material changes that will
necessarily impact the proposal that we just
received on this same topic from the Sub Pro WG.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Claudio</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:40 PM
claudio di gangi <<a
href="mailto:ipcdigangi@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ipcdigangi@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc
1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">David, all, </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thank you for kindly sending
this around.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On the Spanning the Dot
proposal, after our Subteam discussion last
month and some further consultation, my
recommendation is to include the proposal for
public comment, as part of the Phase I initial
report. In other words, not as a formal WG
Recommendation, but as a proposal that the
Working Group will consider based on the public
comments received.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you and Greg would like to
add this topic as a discussion item on our
agenda for Wednesday, or I can mention under
AOB, I am happy to discuss in more detail during
our next team meeting on Wednesday. Thanks!</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best regards,</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Claudio </p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:59
AM McAuley, David via Gnso-rpm-sunrise <<a
href="mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org</a>>
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid
#cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello fellow Sunrise sub
team members and staff,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am submitting this
entry to the thread on
<b>Sunrise Agreed Charter Question 6</b> in
my <b>personal capacity</b>, not in my
sub-team co-chair capacity.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Here are the Charter
Question 6 questions, as per Ariel’s thread
email below:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span
style="color:black"> </span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i><span
style="color:black">Q</span>6(a) What
are Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policies
(SDRPs), and are any changes needed?</i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i>Q6(b)
<span style="color:black">Are SDRPs
serving the purpose(s) for which they
were created?
</span></i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><i>Q6(c) If not,
should they be better publicized, better
used or changed?
</i></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My
<u>suggested answers</u>: </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I suggest we answer the
questions in this manner, and invite comment
here on the thread:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Suggested answer to
Q6(a):
</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">As
to the ‘<u>what are SDRPs</u>’ part of the
question, I don’t see any usefulness in us
trying to answer other than by referring
to existing documents – e.g. to the
Applicant Guidebook, Module 5, </span><a
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_en_applicants_agb_trademark-2Dclearinghouse-2D04jun12-2Den.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dRzB-YypMqj9AZjlP_sZHORJtVF4M6AI0vip1lbQy10&m=I0zLyhOjEMBO6guajQkKd4h4bbZA-sYR1_oXIWXkUUI&s=qsndaGGOZVwypH_jSYo45tfTwMFGsx5wjfgWEuIIo1s&e="
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Trademark
Clearinghouse [newgtlds.icann.org]</a><span
style="color:black">, Section 6 (Mandatory
Rights Protections Mechanisms), with SDRP
as part of the Sunrise registration
process (at 6.2.2 and at 6.2.4).
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">As
to the ‘<u>are any changes needed</u>’
part of the question, it depends on how we
wrap this issue up after
</span>our<span style="color:black">
discussions. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We have several
proposals:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black">First, we have </span><a
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102146375/Proposal%232.pdf?api=v2"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">proposal
#2</a><span style="color:black"> from
George Kirikos which says, in part:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i> </i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i>If the sunrise procedures are retained (a
separate proposal calls for its
elimination), then all details of any
trademark relied upon to secure a sunrise
registration shall be made public, in
order to permit utilization of the SDRP.
Details should include all information
provided to the TMCH (e.g. country,
registration number, TM registration date,
TM owner, goods and services, etc.).
Without limiting an implementation review
team, such publication might be
implemented by making it public at the
source (the TMCH) or via the WHOIS (which
had been done in the past).</i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black">Second, we have a
related ‘operational fix’ proposal related
to George’s from Kathy Kleiman in her
</span><a
href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/2019-May/000288.html"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">email</a><span
style="color:black"> of May 8<sup>th</sup>.
It says, in part:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i><span style="color:black"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i><span style="color:black">Accordingly, a
surgical change seems warranted. Allow a
party associated with a business,
organization or individual having the
same or similar name to the domain name
registered during the Sunrise Period [or
an association or organization
representing its members or affiliates
which include that business,
organization or individual with the same
or similar name], or someone with strong
proof of inaccuracy during Sunrise
registrations, to bring to the Trademark
Clearinghouse a request for data of a
single, specific mark.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i><span style="color:black"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black">Third, we have </span><a
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102146375/Proposal%234.pdf?api=v2"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">proposal
#4</a><span style="color:black"> from
George which says, in part:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i>If the sunrise procedure is retained (a
separate proposal calls for its
elimination), then the Uniregistry
"Substantive Ineligibility" clause be
included as a minimum standard for SDRP
disputes, as per clause 2.1.2. of:
</i><a
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.uniregistry.link_wp-2Dcontent_uploads_2015_07_SEPRP.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=dRzB-YypMqj9AZjlP_sZHORJtVF4M6AI0vip1lbQy10&m=I0zLyhOjEMBO6guajQkKd4h4bbZA-sYR1_oXIWXkUUI&s=fz5yNHH0aMpcqqg4LUYRn-VLMrfuYar4Mt_xSxDbmaw&e="
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><i>https://www.uniregistry.link/<wbr>wp-content/uploads/2015/07/<wbr>SEPRP.pdf
[uniregistry.link]</i></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<i><span style="color:black"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black">And fourth, we
have a proposal that Jeff Neuman forwarded
to the RPM group in his role as a co-chair
of the Subsequent Procedures for New gTLDs
PDP. This proposal is an attachment to
this
</span><a
href="https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-gtld-subsequent-procedures-initial-03jul18/2018q3/000058.html"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">email</a><span
style="color:black"> comment from Google
Registry that the Sub-Pro leadership has
turned over to the RPM PDP. In part it
says:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">
<span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in">
<b><i><span style="color:black">Suggestion
to adjust the terms of the Sunrise
Dispute Resolution Mechanism:
</span></i></b><i><span
style="color:black">We believe that the
rights protection mechanisms designed
for the 2012 round have generally struck
the right balance. However, we
encountered minor issues related to the
inability to consider “dot-span
trademarks” in applying the Sunrise
Dispute Resolution Process (SDRP).<sup>3</sup>
We would recommend that ICANN adjust the
terms of the SDRP such that a registry
could treat dot-span trademarks as
exact-matches when making SDPR
determinations. The Working Group could
also explore extending Sunrise and
Claims services to domains that are
exact matches of dot-span trademarks
registered in the Trademark
Clearinghouse.<sup>4</sup> This
recommendation would not otherwise
affect the requirement that Sunrise
participants demonstrate use of the
underlying trademark in commerce, nor
the ability of registries to reserve
names or designate them as premium. </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.5in">
<i>3. We use the term dot-span trademarks
to refer to instances where the entire
domain name, including the TLD, is an
exact match of a registered trademark.
</i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.5in">
<i>4. For instance, for a TMCH entry for
WALMART the brand owner would be permitted
to register both walm.art and walmart.art
during the Sunrise period for .art, and
would receive claims notifications for
either registration.</i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My opinion is that we
have not heard the ‘wide support’ needed for
sending these along as sub-team
recommendations. Does anything think
otherwise – or want to endeavor again on
list to establish wide support? Is there
promise for such support in the ‘operational
fix’?
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is there a desire to
revisit the ‘span the dot’ issue that
Claudio raised in light of the Google
Registry comment?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Suggested answer to
Q6(b):
</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Despite apparent low
usage rates, it seems to me that our
discussions have shown that SDRPs are
generally serving the purpose(s) for which
they were created.
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b> </b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Suggested answer to
Q6(c):
</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So far, in my opinion, an
answer would not be required based on the
suggestion about Q6(b).
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For now, best regards,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">David</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">David McAuley</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sr International Policy
& Business Development Manager</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Verisign Inc.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">703-948-4154</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid
#e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b>
Gnso-rpm-sunrise <<a
href="mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces@<wbr>icann.org</a>>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Ariel Liang<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 03, 2019 10:49
AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [EXTERNAL]
[Gnso-rpm-sunrise] [Discussion Thread]
Sunrise Q6</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="color:black">Dear Sunrise Sub Team
members,
</span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"> </p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="color:black">As announced, this
thread is being opened for final mailing
list discussions related to
<b>Sunrise Agreed Charter Question</b></span><b>
6</b>, including <b>Proposals #2 and #4</b><span
style="color:black">.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">We
ask that you review the <b>Summary Table</b> <b>(as
of 16 April 2019) </b>and provide any
additional input you may have to the “<b>tentative
answers & preliminary
recommendations</b>” in relation to the
Agreed Charter Question, and consider <b>draft
answers </b>to the following questions
regarding the individual proposal:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="vertical-align:baseline">
<span style="color:black">a. Should the Sub
Team recommend that the full WG consider
including this Individual Proposal in the
Initial Report for the solicitation of
public comment?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="vertical-align:baseline">
<span style="color:black">b. In light of the
Individual Proposal, are any modifications
to the current “tentative answers &
preliminary recommendations” needed?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="vertical-align:baseline">
<span style="color:black">c. Should any
additional Sub Team recommendations be
made in relation to the agreed Sunrise
charter question?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="color:black">Unless the Sub Team
Co-Chairs determine otherwise, this
discussion thread will remain open until
<b>23:59 UTC on 15 May 2019</b>.
Comments/input provided past the closing
date or outside this discussion thread
will not be taken into account when
compiling the final Sub Team member input.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span
style="background:yellow">Summary Table</span>
(Pages 29-32)</b></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><span
style="color:black">The draft answers,
preliminary recommendations, and links to
the relevant individual proposals are in
the latest Summary Table (as of 16 April
2019):</span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><a
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138618/%5BSunrise%20Summary%20Table%5D%20%2816%20April%202019%29.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1555515624235&api=v2"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
style="color:#1155cc">https://community.icann.org/<wbr>download/attachments/<wbr>102138618/%5BSunrise%<wbr>20Summary%20Table%5D%20%2816%<wbr>20April%202019%29.pdf?version=<wbr>1&modificationDate=<wbr>1555515624235&api=v2</span></a><span
style="color:black">.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="color:black;background:yellow">Agreed
Sunrise Charter Question
</span><span style="background:yellow">6</span><span
style="color:black"> (Pages 2</span>9-30)</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">The
Sub Team</span> just<span
style="color:black"> discussed Agreed
Charter Question
</span>6<span style="color:black"> on </span>02
May <span style="color:black">2019, hence
the proposed answers are “TBD”. Based on
the Sub Team’s discussions, the transcript
and notes, staff will provide</span>
update<span style="color:black">.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="color:black"><br>
Q</span>6(a) What are Sunrise Dispute
Resolution Policies (SDRPs), and are any
changes needed?
<span style="color:black"> </span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><span
style="color:black">Proposed Answer</span></u><span
style="color:black">:
</span></b><span style="color:black">TBD</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i><span
style="color:black"><br>
</span>Q6(b) <span style="color:black">Are
SDRPs serving the purpose(s) for which
they were created?
</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><u><span
style="color:black">Proposed Answer</span></u><span
style="color:black">:
</span></b><span style="color:black">TBD</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i> </i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><i>Q6(c) If not, should
they be better publicized, better used or
changed?
</i><span style="color:black"><br>
<b><u>Proposed Answer</u>: </b>TBD</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"><b><span
style="color:black;background:yellow">Individual
Proposals</span></b></p>
<p
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span
style="color:black">The Sub Team just
discussed the Proposals #2 and #4 on 02
May 2019, hence there is no draft answer
currently on the Summary Table (as of 16
April 2019). Based on the Sub Team’s<span> </span>discussions,
the transcript and notes, staff will
provide.</span></p>
<p
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span
style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p
style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span
style="color:black">Link to the individual
proposal is included below.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<b><span style="color:black">Proposal #2</span></b><span
style="color:black">: </span>
<a
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102146375/Proposal%232.pdf?api=v2"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://community.icann.org/<wbr>download/attachments/<wbr>102146375/Proposal%232.pdf?<wbr>api=v2</a><span
style="color:black">
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="color:black">Proposal #4:</span></b><span><span
style="color:black"> </span></span><a
href="https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102146375/Proposal%234.pdf?api=v2"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://community.icann.<wbr>org/download/attachments/<wbr>102146375/Proposal%234.pdf?<wbr>api=v2</a><span><span
style="color:black">
</span></span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="background:yellow">Where to Find
All Discussion Threads</span>
</b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Access the Documents wiki
page and find the opening messages of the
all discussion threads in the table
(highlighted in green):
<a
href="https://community.icann.org/x/_oIWBg"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://community.icann.org/x/<wbr>_oIWBg</a>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"> </span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Best
Regards,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Mary,
Julie, Ariel</span></p>
<p style="margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gnso-rpm-sunrise mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-sunrise"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/gnso-rpm-sunrise</a></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-sunrise mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org">Gnso-rpm-sunrise@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-sunrise">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-sunrise</a></pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>