[Gnso-rpm-tmch] TMCH Sub team meeting Friday, 7 October 2016

[Dawahi Khouloud]

I agree with the group's decision .Thanks kathy and Mary .
On Oct 6, 2016 11:21 PM, "Mary Wong" <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:

> Hello everyone, and thanks very much, Kathy.
>
>
>
> Assuming there is no meeting this Friday, staff can endeavor to get an
> initial draft of a brief Sub Team report to everyone by the following week
> for your review. The scope of the report will likely be as David has
> outlined below, and will refer to but not repeat what was in the first
> report we gave to the full Working Group.
>
>
>
> Again, please send any remaining concerns or comments on the Registries
> and Providers questions to this list; if we may, we suggest 1500 UTC this
> Friday 8 October (i.e. the time at which we would ordinarily have our Sub
> Team meeting) as the deadline so that we can send the questions out at the
> earliest opportunity next week. Staff is already working with Kathy and
> Kurt to solicit WG registrar members for their quick feedback on the
> Registrar questions, following which we hope to send those out soon as well.
>
>
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Mary
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman <
> kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 13:52
> *To: *"gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] TMCH Sub team meeting Friday, 7 October
> 2016
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> With the exception of the questions for Registrars (which Kurt and I,
> together with David and Mary are working on per the delegation of last
> week), I think we are done. I have no comments or changes to the questions.
> Does anyone else?  Shall we send these out?
>
> If so, is there any reason to meet this week or shall we give everyone
> back an hour of their Friday?
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
>
> On 10/5/2016 6:26 AM, David Tait wrote:
>
> Dear Sub-team members
>
>
>
> Just a brief reminder that at our last meeting a final draft of questions
> related to the TMCH was prepared. Should you have any final comments on
> these we would be grateful to receive them asap.
>
>
>
> In relation to the meeting for this week, scheduled for Friday, 7 October
> 2016 at 15:00 UTC, staff would suggest that this would provide an opportune
> time to discuss the report to be sent to the Working Group. Tentatively we
> would suggest that the report could cover the following items:
>
>
>
> ·         Overview of activities to date;
>
> ·         Publicly available data obtained by the ST (i.e. the tabular
> summary prepared by staff);
>
> ·         Outcome of meetings with analysis group; and
>
> ·         Proposed further data gathering from key-stakeholders.
>
>
>
> We would be grateful to receive any comments you had on this outline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> David
>
>
>
> David A. Tait
>
> Policy Specialist (Solicitor qualified in Scotland)
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
> Mobile: + 44-7864-793776
>
> Email:  david.tait at icann.org
>
> www.icann.org[icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DQMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=AdQtvkQLS063vSnf27qxnnRQ83qqReGXDvU1JpJZCKg&s=aXHIKn5IYlxahgC0LaAd-4T0dS0w28I4Hfsq0c_TDPs&e=>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
>
> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20161007/03980617/attachment-0001.html>