[Gnso-rpm-tmch] CANCELED--Re: Please read - cancel sub team call? Re: Revised Questions Listing

Fri Sep 23 14:15:59 UTC 2016

Thanks for the heads up Mary.

Due to the fact that both you and David are unavailable, and other key  sub team members can't make the call, Kathy and I think it best to cancel and regroup next Friday.

I have cc'd the GNSO Secretariat in the hope that one of them will send out an official cancelation notice.

Best, Philip

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell

Twitter: @VLawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 23, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>> wrote:

Dear sub team members, due to travel and a family emergency, neither David nor I will be available to support the sub team meeting today. We are sorry for the late notice. We suggest canceling the call today, and have the sub team continue discussions on the mailing list in preparation for next week. Alternatively, if the group wishes to continue with the call, the secretariat staff on that call will try their best to capture action items and David and I will of course follow up via the transcript and recording as soon as we can.

Please let us know your preference. Thank you - and apologies for the late notice again!

Cheers
Mary

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 23, 2016, at 06:03, "kurt at kjpritz.com<mailto:kurt at kjpritz.com>" <kurt at kjpritz.com<mailto:kurt at kjpritz.com>> wrote:

I agree with Kathy.

We might scan the RPM Working Group list for registrars and schedule a call with just a few of the sub-group team to discuss a suitable data set. Do you think that might be an expeditious path forward.

Kurt

--------- Original Message ---------
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing
From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kathy at kathykleiman.com<mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>>
Date: 9/22/16 10:22 am
To: gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>

Hi Kurt and All,  Tx you for our discussion last Friday and I look forward to continuing this Friday. I also had a chance to give the docs a close look and I've added some comments to the Charter Questions document. I've also reviewed the SubTeam's List of Questions - working off the redline to try to preserve the concerns raised in some of the deleted questions.

I have to tell you that I comfortable with the Provider questions - which I think should go out immediately, and generally with the Registry questions (as edited).

But the Registrar questions trouble me. We are asking for a huge amount of data and they are potentially very, very timeconsuming. Given that the TMCH Subgroup does not have any Registrar representatives (am I missing someone?), i strongly recommend that this set of questions. in draft, go back to the full WG for review with our Registrar members. I would like to hear their thoughts on how we might phrase these questions in a  fair and balanced way - to encourage the best and fullest responses.

Both files attached in Redline.

Best, Kathy

On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, kurt at kjpritz.com<mailto:kurt at kjpritz.com> wrote:
Hi Everyone:

Attached are several forms of the questions for registry operators, registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the questions developed by Susan and Kristine after their review of the charter.

This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in three forms:

  *   redlines to the last version of the question list that show:
     *   new questions from the charter review,
     *   a few question that were deleted where the group voiced concern,
     *   a few grammatical edits
     *   new comments
  *   a version with those redlines accepted but comments remaining
  *   a clean version.

During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with redlines accepted but with comments as they can form the basis of our discussion.

I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that were developed from the review of the charter so that you can see the sources of the new questions.

I hope you find this helpful.

Thank you Susan and Kristine.

Regards,

Kurt

_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch

_______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20160923/68d0b406/attachment-0001.html>