[Gnso-rpm-tmch] [Ext] Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Second table summarizing TMCH Charter questions, relevant input and potential follow up

Tue Feb 7 19:01:57 UTC 2017

Tx for the background, Mary!  I know these materials raised some good 
questions...

Best, Kathy

On 2/7/2017 2:00 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
> Hello Kathy and everyone,
>
> This page from our Working Group wiki space may help make things 
> clearer: https://community.icann.org/x/4SWAAw. You’ll see that staff 
> has listed, in reverse chronological order, the various ICANN papers 
> from which we drew for the Issue Report for (and hence the scope of) 
> this PDP, including the 2015 RPM Staff Paper in question. The wiki 
> page contains the relevant links to the various papers as well as 
> their public comment forums. The specific link to the 2015 RPM Staff 
> Paper is 
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/rpm/rpm-review-11sep15-en.pdf.
>
> Here is a quick summary of where and how the RPM Staff Paper fed into 
> our work (as noted in the Preliminary Issue Report for our PDP):
>
> ·In February 2015, ICANN staff prepared and published for public 
> comment a draft paper on RPMs. A primary purpose for the paper was to 
> try to capture user feedback on their experiences with the various 
> RPMs created for the 2012 New gTLD Program, roughly a year or so after 
> their launch.
>
> ·A final version of the paper was published – incorporating community 
> suggestions and feedback received – in September 2015.
>
> ·This final paper is what staff has been calling the “RPM Staff 
> Paper”, both in the Issue Report for our PDP and generally in our 
> references to it throughout our work so far.
>
> ·As there was considerable community feedback to the 2015 paper as 
> well as to the Preliminary Issue Report for our PDP (published just a 
> month later), the community input for both was integrated into our 
> Final Issue Report, especially for the initial list of Charter 
> questions that we as a Working Group are now refining (starting with 
> the TMCH).
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mary
>
> *From: *Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 13:20
> *To: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org" 
> <gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Second table summarizing TMCH 
> Charter questions, relevant input and potential follow up
>
> Hi Mary,
>
> Tx you for preparing this week's materials. The materials quote 
> extensively from a 2015 ICANN Staff report. Could you kindly circulate 
> the link to the full paper?
>
> Also, could you provide more background on this report?  Is it the one 
> posted for public comment by Staff to help the GNSO Community identify 
> issues of importance for consideration by our (then upcoming) WG?
>
> Best and tx,
>
> Kathy
>
> On 2/6/2017 9:50 AM, Mary Wong wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     Following on the circulation of the previous summary table of the
>     questions, input and discussions so far on TMCH Charter Questions
>     categories 1 and 2 (below), please find attached a similar summary
>     table for the remaining categories (3 – 6). As the Working Group
>     has yet to begin discussing these, staff has taken the liberty of
>     adding what we believe to be relevant background information from
>     the community comments to the TMCH that were provided for the 2015
>     RPM Paper.
>
>     We will post both tables to the Working Group wiki for your easy
>     reference as well.
>
>     Thanks and cheers
>
>     Mary
>
>     *From: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>     *Date: *Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 18:18
>     *To: *"gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
>     <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
>     *Subject: *Table summarizing TMCH Charter questions, WG follow up
>     questions, and input from Deloitte and Registry Operators
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     As discussed at the end of the Working Group call yesterday, staff
>     has begun to compile a table that combines the agreed TMCH Charter
>     questions with the relevant Working Group follow up questions,
>     Deloitte response (if any), and (where applicable) input that was
>     received from various registry operators and the Registries
>     Stakeholder Group (note that the Registries SG is the only
>     community group so far that has provided us with a response to our
>     initial solicitation for input from all the various Supporting
>     Organizations, Advisory Committees and GNSO Stakeholder Groups and
>     Constituencies).
>
>     Attached is the compilation we have done for TMCH Categories 1
>     (Education) and 2 (Verification and Updating of TMCH Data). As
>     Kathy and others noted on the call, not all questions have direct
>     responses, and in some cases we have inserted what we thought
>     might be relevant information even if it is not an actual reply.
>     Do let us know if you spot any inaccuracies or omissions.
>
>     We hope you find the document useful. If we may, we suggest that
>     you review it with a view toward identifying the following:
>
>     ·*/What additional data or follow up input is needed, and from
>     whom, to complete our review of these aspects of the TMCH?/*
>
>     ·*/What additional data or follow up input should we request from
>     Deloitte, including for our expected discussion with them at
>     ICANN58?/*
>
>     *//*
>
>     Please note that we have not yet included any information from the
>     Analysis Group’s review of the TMCH, as we understand that a Final
>     Report will be forthcoming from them shortly, and possibly before
>     ICANN58. We will incorporate any relevant data once the Final
>     Report is out, and will in the meantime continue working on a
>     table for the remaining TMCH Charter categories and questions.
>
>     The full Deloitte response to the TMCH Data Gathering questions
>     and the three responses we received to the set of
>     Registry-directed questions can be found here:
>     https://community.icann.org/x/_pHRAw[community.icann.org]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_-5FpHRAw&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=txu4quJ-kJYqZFGGBrsz8FR7RlWROJJZYbtYwuwdLoA&s=kMasFGEzKJIGC9beGCYEJ4FTjcaSSyjVy0CXPLK7m7s&e=>.
>
>
>     The full Registries Stakeholder Group response to our early
>     solicitation for overall input can be found here:
>     https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/59643854/RySG%20RPM%20Response_05JUL16.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1468352438000&api=v2[community.icann.org]
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_download_attachments_59643854_RySG-2520RPM-2520Response-5F05JUL16.pdf-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1468352438000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=txu4quJ-kJYqZFGGBrsz8FR7RlWROJJZYbtYwuwdLoA&s=a9vXX1z-GNEHtni6t5k9jdDeJolJBjdr3PVxcLjUmBg&e=>.
>
>
>     Thanks and cheers
>
>     Mary
>
>     Mary Wong
>
>     Senior Policy Director
>
>     Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>     Email: mary.wong at icann.org <mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>
>
>     Telephone: +1-603-5744889
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>
>     gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-tmch at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-tmch/attachments/20170207/011b56f5/attachment-0001.html>