<div>I agree with Kathy. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>We might scan the RPM Working Group list for registrars and schedule a call with just a few of the sub-group team to discuss a suitable data set. Do you think that might be an expeditious path forward. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kurt</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="threadBlockQuote" style="border-left: 2px solid #C2C2C2; padding-left: 3px; margin-left: 4px;">--------- Original Message ---------
<div>Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing<br />From: "Kathy Kleiman" <kathy@kathykleiman.com><br />Date: 9/22/16 10:22 am<br />To: gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org<br /><br />
<p>Hi Kurt and All, Tx you for our discussion last Friday and I look forward to continuing this Friday. I also had a chance to give the docs a close look and I've added some comments to the Charter Questions document. I've also reviewed the SubTeam's List of Questions - working off the redline to try to preserve the concerns raised in some of the deleted questions.</p>
<p>I have to tell you that I comfortable with the Provider questions - which I think should go out immediately, and generally with the Registry questions (as edited).</p>
<p>But the Registrar questions trouble me. We are asking for a huge amount of data and they are potentially very, very timeconsuming. Given that the TMCH Subgroup does not have any Registrar representatives (am I missing someone?), i strongly recommend that this set of questions. in draft, go back to the full WG for review with our Registrar members. I would like to hear their thoughts on how we might phrase these questions in a fair and balanced way - to encourage the best and fullest responses. </p>
<p>Both files attached in Redline. </p>
<p>Best, Kathy</p>
<p> </p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com">kurt@kjpritz.com</a> wrote:</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20160915181752.9728824825d8130ed546db9649e48f42.651e80b10e.mailapi@email01.godaddy.com">
<div>Hi Everyone:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Attached are several forms of the questions for registry operators, registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the questions developed by Susan and Kristine after their review of the charter. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in three forms: </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>redlines to the last version of the question list that show:
<ul>
<li>new questions from the charter review,</li>
<li>a few question that were deleted where the group voiced concern,</li>
<li>a few grammatical edits</li>
<li>new comments</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>a version with those redlines accepted but comments remaining</li>
<li>a clean version.</li>
</ul>
<div>During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with redlines accepted but with comments as they can form the basis of our discussion. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that were developed from the review of the charter so that you can see the sources of the new questions.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I hope you find this helpful.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thank you Susan and Kristine.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kurt</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<br /><fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset><br />
<pre>_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org">Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br />_______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch</div>
</blockquote>