<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Hi Kurt and All, Tx you for our discussion last Friday and I
look forward to continuing this Friday. I also had a chance to
give the docs a close look and I've added some comments to the
Charter Questions document. I've also reviewed the SubTeam's List
of Questions - working off the redline to try to preserve the
concerns raised in some of the deleted questions.</p>
<p>I have to tell you that I comfortable with the Provider questions
- which I think should go out immediately, and generally with the
Registry questions (as edited).</p>
<p>But the Registrar questions trouble me. We are asking for a huge
amount of data and they are potentially very, very timeconsuming.
Given that the TMCH Subgroup does not have any Registrar
representatives (am I missing someone?), i strongly recommend that
this set of questions. in draft, go back to the full WG for review
with our Registrar members. I would like to hear their thoughts on
how we might phrase these questions in a fair and balanced way -
to encourage the best and fullest responses. <br>
</p>
<p>Both files attached in Redline. <br>
</p>
<p>Best, Kathy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com">kurt@kjpritz.com</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20160915181752.9728824825d8130ed546db9649e48f42.651e80b10e.mailapi@email01.godaddy.com"
type="cite">
<div>Hi Everyone:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Attached are several forms of the questions for registry
operators, registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the
questions developed by Susan and Kristine after their review of
the charter. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in
three forms: </div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>redlines to the last version of the question list that
show:
<ul>
<li>new questions from the charter review,</li>
<li>a few question that were deleted where the group
voiced concern,</li>
<li>a few grammatical edits</li>
<li>new comments</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>a version with those redlines accepted but comments
remaining</li>
<li>a clean version.</li>
</ul>
<div>During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with
redlines accepted but with comments as they can form the basis
of our discussion. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that
were developed from the review of the charter so that you can
see the sources of the new questions.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I hope you find this helpful.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thank you Susan and Kristine.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Kurt</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org">Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>