[Gnso-rpm-trademark] Action Items for the Trademark Claims Sub Team Call - 9 June 2017

[Amr Elsadr]

Dear Trademark Claims Sub Team Members,

Below are the action items from the Sub Team Call on 9 June. The action items, notes, meeting document and materials as well as recordings and transcripts have been posted to the meeting’s wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/mzzwAw.

Thanks.

Amr


Action Items:


  1.  Sub Team to draft a question(s) that would allow the WG to analyze the proposals by Michael Graham, Greg Shatan and Brian Winterfeldt during the Trademark Claims Review
  2.  Sub Team to use the following question as a starting point for discussion of the proposals on non-exact matches by Michael Graham, Greg Shatan and Brian Winterfeldt: "In light of the evidence of the TM Claims gathered in Questions 1-3 above, how extensive is the need for non-exact matches? What is the proof of harm under the existing system? What unintended consequences might non-exact matches have?  What is the appropriate balance going forward? a. If non-exact matches are not adopted, then no further action is necessary. b. If non-exact matches of some form are adopted, should the marks in the TMCH be used to generate non-exact matches for the purpose of providing a broader range of claims notices?  If so, how should the claims notices be written?"


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/attachments/20170612/de4e2eeb/attachment.html>