[Gnso-rpm-trademark] Action Items from Trademark Claims Sub Team Call - 5 May 2017

[Amr Elsadr]

Dear Sub Team Members,

Below are the action items from today’s Trademark Claims Sub Team call. The action items, notes, documents, recordings and transcripts from today’s call can be found on today’s meeting wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/PwTfAw. The documents used in today’s call are also attached to this email, and the Google Doc containing the updated simplified table of the Charter questions can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13u5h6Wh6QUqW0vzT5q0zCTEmjMQ8_iCat6ZehLHQC7Q/edit

Action Items:


1.       Staff to change wording of question 2 from “Is the Trademark Claims service having any unintended consequences, such as a “chilling effect” on good-faith registrations” to “Is the Trademark Claims service having any unintended consequences, such as deterring good-faith registrations”

2.       Sub Team Co-Chairs, with assistance from staff, to draft a new question or possibly revise existing questions - ask how the Claims notification might be edited, or a potential requirement of a second Claims notice targeting registration attempts of non-exact matches

3.       Sub Team Co-Chairs, with assistance of staff, to draft a question enquiring to what extent translations of the Claims notification are effective and reaching the right audience

4.       Staff to delete Revised Question 2 “Should the Trademark Claims period be extended beyond ninety (90) days?”, as it is now included in the sub-questions of the updated questions 1 and 2

5.       Staff to redraft updated questions 1 and 2 taking into consideration proposed reordering of questions as follows: Updated Question 1 then Updated Question 2, followed by Updated Questions 1a/2a, then finally Updated Updated Questions 1a/2a i --> iv

6.       Staff to add a question to the next Sub Team agenda: Should the Sub Team ask the Working Group to conduct an initial analysis of any data gathered as part of its task, before the broader Working Group considers this data?

Thanks.

Amr
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/attachments/20170505/7cbf41bd/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TrademarkClaimsCharterQuestions-UpdatedSimplifiedTable.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 77409 bytes
Desc: TrademarkClaimsCharterQuestions-UpdatedSimplifiedTable.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/attachments/20170505/7cbf41bd/TrademarkClaimsCharterQuestions-UpdatedSimplifiedTable-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft Updated Work Plan - 2 May 2017.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 358315 bytes
Desc: Draft Updated Work Plan - 2 May 2017.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/attachments/20170505/7cbf41bd/DraftUpdatedWorkPlan-2May2017-0001.pdf>