[Gnso-rpm-trademark] REMINDER - ACTION REQUESTED: Nominations/Volunteers for RPM Trademark Claims Sub Team

Tue Dec 18 19:36:14 UTC 2018

Hello everyone,
	Since it seems we are short on volunteers for the chairing, and today is the deadline, I volunteer myself to be co-chair and help around on that work. In any case,  count with my active participation.

Best,

Martín Silva Valent
GNSO Councilor

> On 18 Dec 2018, at 16:23, Dorrain, Kristine via Gnso-rpm-trademark <gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone, 
>  
> Unfortunately, I’m in the same position.  I do plan to continue being active, but can’t commit the necessary time and attention to serve as chair or co-chair at this time. I appreciate the nomination.
>  
> Best,
> Kristine
>  
> From: Gnso-rpm-trademark [mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Griffin Barnett
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 8:40 AM
> To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>; gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-trademark] REMINDER - ACTION REQUESTED: Nominations/Volunteers for RPM Trademark Claims Sub Team
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> I must unfortunately decline the nomination to chair or co-chair this sub-team at this time. While I appreciate the support, I don’t think I have the necessary bandwidth to chair or co-chair right now. Of course, I will continue to participate as actively as possible.
>  
> Sincerely,
> Griffin
>  
> Griffin M. Barnett
> Associate
> Winterfeldt IP Group
>  
>  
>  
>  <> 
> From: Gnso-rpm-trademark [mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark-bounces at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2018 10:09 AM
> To: gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org>
> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-trademark] REMINDER - ACTION REQUESTED: Nominations/Volunteers for RPM Trademark Claims Sub Team
> Importance: High
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> Per action item 2 below from today’s meeting, please submit to the Sub Team list any volunteers or nominations to lead the RPM Trademark Claims Sub Team by COB Tuesday, 18 December.
>  
> Nominations/volunteers received as of 17 December:  Griffin Barnett (nominated by Cyntia King and Michael Graham; Kristine Dorrain (nominated by Michael Graham).
>  
> Best,
> Julie
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>  
> From: Gnso-rpm-trademark <gnso-rpm-trademark-bounces at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org <mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>
> Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 3:47 PM
> To: "gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org>>
> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-trademark] Actions & Notes: RPM Trademark Claims Sub Team Meeting 12 Dec 1700 UTC
>  
> Dear All,
>  
> Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Trademark Claims Sub Team meeting held on 12 December 2018 (17:00-18:00 UTC).  Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes.  Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at:https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+team+for+Trademark+Claims <https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+team+for+Trademark+Claims>.
>  
> See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905>.
>    
> Best Regards,
> Julie
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>  
> ==
>  
> NOTES & ACTION ITEMS
>  
> Actions:
> Staff to add original numbering to the agreed questions. (DONE)
> Sub Team members to volunteer or nominate candidates for Sub Team leader. (ONGOING)
> Sub Team members: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Rows 12-27 of the "Actual & Potential Registrants" tab answer the agreed question 1 and its sub questions (a) and (b), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905>. (BY 19 DEC)  See:
>  
> Question 1 (Final Charter Questions for Trademark Claims)
> Is the Trademark Claims service having its intended effect? Consider the following questions specifically in the context both of a Claims Notice as well as a Notice of Registered Name:
> a) Is the Trademark Claims service having its intended effect of deterring bad-faith registrations and providing Claims Notice to domain name applicants?
> b) Is the Trademark Claims service having any unintended consequences, such as deterring good-faith domain name applications?
>  
> Notes:
>  
> 1. Statements of Interest: no updates. 
>  
> 2. Select Sub Team Leader: 
>  
> -- Cynthia King nominated Griffin Barnett, who is considering the nomination.
> -- Kristine Dorrain is considering whether to volunteer.
> -- Griffin and Kristine may consider whether to offering to Co-Lead the Sub Team.
>  
> 3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905 <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905>
>  
> -- First tab (far left) is the content table.
> -- First column is the consolidated data from the survey results.
>  
> Example: Actual & Potential Registrant Response:
> -- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions.
> -- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic).
> -- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related.
> -- Column C: Sub Team's draft question.
> -- Column D: Actual registrant response.
> -- Column E: Potential registrant response
> -- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group.
> -- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise.
>  
> Discussion:
> -- The table ties back to the agreed charter questions.  Once the analysis is done there may be information here that may be relevant to other charter questions.
> -- First, go through survey results.
> -- Then how or whether the survey results answer the agreed questions.
> -- How the survey results may answer other survey questions.
> -- Goal is to answer the charter questions.  Don't get bogged down in analyzing the data.  Focus on column A and how we get the answers.
> -- Question: What is in the tabs?  That is the raw data/detailed responses.
>  
> 4. Begin survey analysis:
>  
> Second tab: Actual & Potential Registrants
> Column A: (reading the questions)
>  
> Discussion:
> -- Based on the results it seems pretty clear that only half of the people who were not actual registrants answered the question about the notice correctly.  Effectiveness and claims notice.
> -- Note that some respondents seem to have been deterred (worried).
> -- Claims notice: overarching question -- background question -- how much deterrence is acceptable?
> -- #4/#5: That is what row 14 is answering.  Is the notice intimidating, not the service.
> -- Look at the survey analysis group outside of ICANN -- the meaning what the notice, half of the answers the distractor answers (wrong/unhelpful).  Didn't understand the notice.
> -- Proposal: Take question 1, sub parts a and b, study those questions, and compare against the 3 tabs.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-rpm-trademark mailing list
> Gnso-rpm-trademark at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-trademark

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/attachments/20181218/50cfad45/attachment-0001.html>