[gnso-rpm-wg] Suggestion for Leadership Team

Tue Apr 12 22:06:34 UTC 2016

I strongly agree with Susan - The work is likely to bee too much for only one person, and 2 (yes - two) co-chairs will make a big difference (in a positive way) to split it up, to participate in preparations in between our WG meetings as well as to lead our calls and physical meetings.

There will definately be additional possibilities and work to do as vice chairs and/or sub-group / sub-tobic chairs, etc for a number of other members of this WG (including myself ;-)

Best,
Petter

-- 
Petter Rindforth, LL M

Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Sweden
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu
www.fenixlegal.eu

NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu
Thank you

12 april 2016 16:55:01 +02:00, skrev Susan Payne via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>:

> I think a leadership team of 4 is getting out of hand. This is an important PDP certainly but it unlikely to be as anything like as complex as the Subsequent Procedures one, and even that is currently managing with 3. I would have said 2 co-chairs is the way to go for this one. I’m concerned that the bigger the “leadership” group the harder it is for them to find a time that they can actually get together to plan for the calls. The role of the chair(s) is to be impartial after all so it should not matter where they come from but rather whether they have the requisite skill-set.
> 
> 
> Susan Payne
> Head of Legal Policy|Valideus LtdE:<susan.payne at valideus.com>D: +44 20 7421 8255T: +44 20 7421 8299M: +44 7971 661175
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf OfJonathan Frost via gnso-rpm-wg
> Sent: 12 April 2016 15:45
> To:
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Suggestion for Leadership Team
> 
> I tend to agree that there might be balance issues in that the non-contracted party house would have three representatives and the contracted party house would have none.
> 
> I think a viable option would be to Phil as the Chair, J. Scott and Kathy as Vice Chairs, and a third vice chair from the contracted party house, to balance the equation.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> From:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf OfGreg Shatan via gnso-rpm-wg
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:38 AM
> To: Statton Hammock <statton at rightside.rocks>
> Cc: Zahid Jamil-IG via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Suggestion for Leadership Team
> 
> I have some concerns with this configuration in terms of balance (and related concerns about the accuracy of Volker's categorizations, on both the "formal" and de facto levels). As such I would instead suggest J. Scott and Kathy as co-chairs, with Phil remaining in the role of GNSO Liaison (the primary role to which Phil was already appointed).
> 
> 
> 
> Greg Shatan
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Statton Hammock via gnso-rpm-wg <<gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>> wrote:
> 
> > Also agree with Volker's suggestion.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Statton
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Statton Hammock
> > Vice-President, Business & Legal Affairs
> > Image removed by sender. Rightside
> > Office | 425-298-2367 <tel:425-298-2367>
> > Mobile | 425-891-9297 <tel:425-891-9297>
> > <statton at rightside.rocks>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Gabriela Szlak via gnso-rpm-wg <<gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>> wrote:
> > 
> > > + 1 to Volker.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Gabriela Szlak
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Skype:gabrielaszlak
> > > Twitter: @GabiSzlak
> > > 
> > > La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
> > > 
> > > The information in this e-mail is confidential.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 2016-04-12 10:24 GMT-03:00 Volker Greimann via gnso-rpm-wg <<gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>:
> > > 
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > 
> > > > with the list of nominations and seconds that we have right now (and provided we will not get any last minute nominations), it looks like Phil, Scott and Kathy have the most support. While none of these candidates represent contracted parties, I do not see this as a problem, as I have great faith in the neutrality of all candidates.
> > > > 
> > > > With Phil formally representing business interests, Scott the IP concerns and Kathy the non commercial users, I propose we consider a triumvirate, maybe with one chair and two co/vice-chairs, with Phil as chair and Scott and Kathy as co-chairs.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Volker
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> > > > <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> > > > <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> > > <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> > > <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> > <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> > <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20160413/739ed8b2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 359 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20160413/739ed8b2/image001-0001.jpg>