[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Provider and Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP

Tue Oct 18 12:55:40 UTC 2016

Five out of sixteen is 'overwhelming'? Really?

 I can only imagine the adjective that would have been used if anything close to a majority supported this position.

----------------------------------------
 From: "J. Scott Evans" <jsevans at adobe.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:56 AM
To: "David Tait" <david.tait at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Provider and Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP   
   Wow. The respondents seem to really believe (overwhelmingly so) that we need to amend the PDDRP to make is useable.

 Thoughts? Discussion?

 J. Scott

J. Scott Evans  | Associate General Counsel - Trademarks, Copyright, Domains & Marketing |   

Adobe    

345 Park Avenue   

San Jose, CA 95110
408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell)
jsevans at adobe.com   

www.adobe.c om  

   From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of David Tait <david.tait at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 2:36 AM
To: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Provider and Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP

Dear All  

Further to my previous email I attach a further revised version of this document which (following a request from the co-chairs) now contains the graphs once again.  

Kind regards,

David  

From: David Tait <david.tait at icann.org>
Date: Friday, 14 October 2016 at 15:08
To: <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Provider and Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP 

Dear Jeff  

Further to your previous email I am pleased to attach a consolidated version of the responses received.  

Kind regards,

David   

From: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 11:09
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: RE: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Provider and Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP 

Thanks Mary for this.  Is there a way to combine all of the written responses in the summary document as well especially to questions 6, 7, 8, 10.  

Jeffrey J. Neuman  

Senior Vice President |Valideus USA| Com Laude USA  

1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600  

Mclean, VA 22102, United States  

E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com  

T: +1.703.635.7514  

M: +1.202.549.5079  

@Jintlaw  

From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 3:49 PM
To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Provider and Survey Responses on TM-PDDRP 

Dear all,  

You will recall that the Working Group had agreed to resume deliberations over the Trademark Post-Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure (TM-PDDRP) after receipt of responses from the TM-PDDRP providers and closure of the Community Survey.   

We received responses from two providers – FORUM and WIPO, for which we thank Brian Beckham, Ty Gray, Daniel Legerski and their colleagues. We also collected sixteen community member responses to the TM-PDDRP Community Survey, including from registrars and intellectual property rights-holders. All the responses, as well as an aggregated data report on the Community Survey, have now been uploaded to the Working Group wiki space here:  https://community.icann.org/x/ugqsAw[community.icann.org].   

The Working Group co-chairs have asked that Working Group members review these responses in time for our next call on 19 October 2016, where, if time permits, we will start discussing them. At the moment, we anticipate that a fuller review, including community participation, will be the focus of the Working Group’s open meeting at ICANN57 in Hyderabad. This will allow us to complete this initial review of the TM-PDDRP shortly thereafter.  

FYI the tentative date and time of the open Working Group meeting at ICANN57 is currently Monday 7 November (Day 5 of the meeting), from 11.00-12.30 local Hyderabad time. As with all these sessions, remote participation facilities will be made available for those who will not be present in Hyderabad.  

Thanks and cheers  

Mary  

Mary Wong   

Senior Policy Director 

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email:  mary.wong at icann.org 

Telephone: +1-603-5744889 

----------------------------------------

<ACL> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20161018/107f502c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attachment 1
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 14697 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20161018/107f502c/Attachment1-0001.obj>