[gnso-rpm-wg] A Brave New World Without Sunrises or the TMCH

J. Scott Evans jsevans at adobe.com
Fri Apr 14 20:18:33 UTC 2017


You are correct Georges


J. Scott Evans
408.536.5336 (tel)
345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544
Director, Associate General Counsel
408.709.6162 (cell)
San Jose, CA, 95110, USA
Adobe. Make It an Experience.
jsevans at adobe.com
www.adobe.com
 
 
 

On 4/14/17, 12:39 PM, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Nahitchevansky, Georges" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of ghn at kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:

    I believe the 130 is an average per extension
    
      Original Message
    From: George Kirikos
    Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 3:38 PM
    To: Greg Shatan
    Cc: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
    Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] A Brave New World Without Sunrises or the TMCH
    
    
    Hello,
    
    On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
    >Anyone who has maintained a trademark and domain name
    > portfolio for a company or a celebrity knows how many abusive domain names
    > there are out there, and how many they have had to acquire (by various
    > means) over the years.  A world where there is no need for a company to take
    > a domain name out of circulation, because there was no need to do so is a
    > pipe dream.
    
    We're talking about 130 domains/TLD, in sunrise. The numbers speak for
    themselves. Use it, or lose it.
    
    > I won't speak for Apple (since I don't represent them) but let's talk about
    > a hypothetical "Peach" company. If there was a 100% chance that
    > peach.recipes or peach.menu would only be used for recipes or other good
    > faith unrelated uses, that would be great for many companies. But there's no
    > way to know.
    
    As I said, raise the bar in landrush. Share liability with registrars
    (who can't escape liability easily). Insurance rates would be higher
    for "risky" domain name registrants. e.g. the cost for Apple (iPhone
    maker) to indemnify CSC or Markmonitor to register Apple.TLD would be
    $0. Cost for John Zuccarini would be much higher, to indemnify his
    registrar against risk of misuse.
    
    > A solution that involves trademark owners spending even more money, and
    > solving every problem by throwing money at the domain name industry, is a
    > non-starter.
    
    They're not spending that money now (130 sunrise registrations,
    remember). And they're spending perhaps $10MM/yr on TMCH (direct fees,
    plus time, etc.). Spend smarter, by eliminating the ineffective TMCH
    that has too many negative consequences upon others.
    
    > Based on the discussion earlier, it didn't seem to me that Flowers.tld was
    > "gamed" no matter what the definition of gaming.  I didn't dig through the
    > back and forth on hotel.tld.  I'm concerned with a lot of the accusations of
    > gaming that were made that didn't seem to hold water as they were
    > examined....
    
    If they relied upon an obscure country's registered TM (let's see the
    TMCH opened up to check) to register in sunrise, then I (and many
    others) would disagree. The mantra that "a TM is a TM is a TM" is
    untrue, despite how often some want to repeat it.
    
    > Financial penalties on defaulting respondents is also not going to solve
    > anything, because they will be nowhere to be found.
    
    Read what I proposed more closely. By involving registrars (contracted
    parties) to share in the liability of landush ("know your client",
    etc.), someone to pay is much easier to find. (registrars have to have
    liability insurance in place, too).
    
    If folks keep an open mind, and just look at the numbers, it's not as
    outlandish as you might think. As I noted above, I'd be happy to see
    new gTLDs keep failing.....but, at least I'm putting forth some ideas
    that eliminate some of the unfairness in the bad policies that were
    part of the sausage factory when they were created.
    
    Sincerely,
    
    George Kirikos
    416-588-0269
    https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.leap.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2af9f2fd113d4b92151c08d4836dfe15%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636277955823137402&sdata=8B4MriHVL%2FbI2pfiQezJNisTZFusY2aUh7o%2FMGVK4Rg%3D&reserved=0
    _______________________________________________
    gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
    gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
    https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgnso-rpm-wg&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2af9f2fd113d4b92151c08d4836dfe15%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636277955823137402&sdata=QLRQzu4Vmz6kwAUhqZiR8%2F5IGArFm8F7e1zq9uwX6NQ%3D&reserved=0
    
    ________________________________
    
    Confidentiality Notice:
    This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
    
    ________________________________
    
    ***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
    _______________________________________________
    gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
    gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
    https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgnso-rpm-wg&data=02%7C01%7C%7C2af9f2fd113d4b92151c08d4836dfe15%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636277955823137402&sdata=QLRQzu4Vmz6kwAUhqZiR8%2F5IGArFm8F7e1zq9uwX6NQ%3D&reserved=0
    



More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list