[gnso-rpm-wg] Requesting data to assist with Working Group deliberations

Paul Keating Paul at law.es
Mon Apr 24 15:35:44 UTC 2017


I think that #2 should be seriously considered.

From:  <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong
<mary.wong at icann.org>
Date:  Monday, April 24, 2017 at 4:32 PM
To:  "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject:  [gnso-rpm-wg] Requesting data to assist with Working Group
deliberations

> Dear all,
>  
> In view of various posts that have noted the possible need for additional data
> in some important discussion areas, staff hopes the following notes ­ on
> existing data on extending either the Claims Service or ³exact match² test,
> and on the GNSO process for requesting data and metrics ­ are helpful.
>  
> 1.      Extending Claims or Exact Match
> 
>  
> The Analysis Group¹s revised report on the TMCH notes the need to consider the
> tradeoffs that may need to be made among various stakeholder groups in making
> policy decisions on these topics. The report emphasizes that limitations of
> the data used for the report meant the Analysis Group could not reach
> definitive conclusions on a possible deterrent effect, or perform a
> cost-benefit analysis. Will it be helpful for the Working Group (or a relevant
> Sub Team) to try to identify whether, and how, the data gap can be filled for
> these topics of ongoing discussion?
>  
> 2.      Process for Submitting Data Request to the GNSO Council or ICANN
> 
>  
> In 2016, the GNSO Council approved the recommendations of its Working Group on
> Data & Metrics for Policy Making, with the result that there is now a process
> in place by which active Working Groups can formally request that the GNSO
> Council or ICANN approve data acquisition (other than via the informal
> processes used to date). This may be especially useful in instances where it
> is necessary to obtain data through professional assistance and third party
> sources (but which carry a potential budgetary and resource impact).
>  
> The process requires that the group:
> ·        Provide a detailed problem statement
> 
> ·        Identify a set of requirements to determine the scope of the exercise
> 
> ·        Identify potential sources (internal and external)
> 
> ·        Make an estimate regarding the resources required such as scope,
> people, access to data, complexity of requirements, sources, and possible
> budget implications (see Section 4.5, pages 14-15 of the GNSO Working Group
> Guidelines: 
> https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-01sep16-en.pdf;
> the process is also visually depicted here:
> https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/dmpm-metrics-request-framework-20jan16-en.pd
> f. 
> 
>  
> Is this something the group thinks is or may be necessary in view of ongoing
> discussions?
>  
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>  
> _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170424/6cda659c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list