[gnso-rpm-wg] Recommendation for Questions #7 and #16 (Design Mark and Appropriate Balance)

Jeremy Malcolm jmalcolm at eff.org
Wed Apr 26 17:46:31 UTC 2017


On 26/4/17 10:41 am, Silver, Bradley wrote:
> Jeremy - the TMCH does not allow exclusive rights in domains.  Having a mark in the TMCH affords nothing close an exclusive right.  That's a basic truth which shouldn’t be ignored.

The sunrise period can allow the owner of (to use Rebecca's example) the
PARENTS stylized mark to seize the parents.forum domain to the exclusion
of someone who wants to run a parenting forum.  Call it an exclusive
right or whatever you want, but it goes further than trademark law.  A
rose by any other name...

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170426/fcac9619/signature-0001.asc>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list