[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Draft collated proposal for Sunrise-related data collection

[Nahitchevansky, Georges]

George

Can we stop this back and forth on the same issue. A number of folks have told you they do not support a proposal to eliminate sunrise‎. So in mind I think we know what the positions are.  It is not helpful to keep re-hashing the same points. Can we just move on to discussing possible fixes  for the limited gaming issue as a separate topic.



  Original Message
From: George Kirikos
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 4:04 PM
To: gnso-rpm-wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW & DISCUSSION: Draft collated proposal for Sunrise-related data collection


Hello,

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Jonathan Frost <jonathan at get.club> wrote:
> It's moot because the vast majority of registries will implement Sunrise
> even if not mandated.

For those now suggesting that the topic is "moot", then you should be
in support of ICANN eliminating the requirement (i.e. at best you'd be
indifferent), i.e. you should be supporting Jeremy's proposal, as it
would simplify the ICANN new gTLD process/guidebook, etc., and would
be one less policy for overworked volunteers to review every 5 or 10
or 20 years, etc. In other words, if the topic is "moot", why aren't
you backing Jeremy's proposal to eliminate it? It's nonsensical to me
to see an argument on the one hand that the topic is "moot" because
registries will still implement it, but then support its continuation
as a *mandated* ICANN policy requirement.

If we have consensus to support Jeremy's proposal now, I would
certainly not oppose moving on to other topics.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice:
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.

________________________________

***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.