[gnso-rpm-wg] Action items and updated documents from Working Group call of 15 February

Massimo Massimo at origin-gi.com
Wed Feb 22 10:08:15 UTC 2017


Dear Mary,

GIs associations or groups (called Federations, Consorzia, Consejos Reguladores, Comités interprofessionels, depending on their country and language) are responsible to protect their respective GIs. In practice, they perform the procedures of GIs registration and enforcement at the national level as well as in in foreign jurisdictions where they seek protection. If we use the expression “GIs governance bodies” (rather than “certification bodies/associations”), I believe we will capture the essence of such GIs associations or groups, notwithstanding their country or language.

Best,

Massimo


From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: 17 February 2017 00:37
To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action items and updated documents from Working Group call of 15 February

Dear all,

Please find attached the updated Tabular Summary for Categories 3-6 for your review (also posted to the Working Group wiki page with notes and recordings for this call, at https://community.icann.org/x/TZ3DAw). Please also note the following action items, which are also reflected in the updated table.

Action Items:


·         On Q7 (design marks) – Rebecca Tushnet to take the lead in developing a few examples of hypothetical design marks for sending to Deloitte for their views


·         On Q8 (Geographical Indicators) – Staff to confirm with OriGIn who may be able to submit G.I.s.


·         On Q9 (TM+50) – Working Group to review questions submitted by the Registries Stakeholder Group with a view toward agreement on whether to send them on to Deloitte


·         On Q14 (Accessibility) – Working Group to consider if there are additional/alternative sources that can provide us with more information.


·         [From last week] – please review the updated Tabular Summary for Categories 1 & 2 from last week and submit any follow up questions or suggestions for Deloitte to this mailing list. The updated document is available under Follow Up Notes from the wiki page notes of the call last week: https://community.icann.org/x/Q53DAw.


·         [From last week] – please review the TMCH Dispute Resolution Procedures and suggest areas for discussion or follow up to this mailing list. The updated document is available under Follow Up Notes from the wiki page notes of the call last week: https://community.icann.org/x/Q53DAw.

Next Steps:


·         Staff will compile additional suggestions received from Working Group members on possible questions and requests for follow up with Deloitte, from both Tabular Summaries for Categories 1 & 2 (from last week) and for Categories 3-6. Please try to submit your feedback by close of business in your time zone on Tuesday 21 February at the latest so that we can have a full list ready as soon as possible.

Thank you.

Cheers
Mary

From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org<mailto:mary.wong at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 11:08
To: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: Proposed agenda and documents for RPM Working Group call on 15 February

Dear all,

The proposed agenda for the next Working Group call, scheduled for 15 February 2017 at 1700 UTC, is as follows:


1.       Roll call (via Adobe Connect and phone bridge only); updates to Statements of Interest

2.       Review table for Categories 3-6, with view to developing additional questions for Deloitte or that require further information

3.       Next steps/next meeting

Please note that the table for Agenda Item #2 had been circulated previously, on 6 February, and is also available on our Working Group wiki space here: https://community.icann.org/x/_pHRAw.

Please note also the Action Items from the meeting last week, which were as follows:


·         Over the next week, WG members to review the table for Categories 1 & 2 and the discussions to date, in order for staff to compile and send all follow up questions to Deloitte before ICANN58 so as to have an informed discussion with them at ICANN58 (updated table was circulated on 10 February and is also available here: https://community.icann.org/x/_pHRAw)

·         WG members to also review the TMCH Dispute Resolution Procedures and agree on any follow up questions for Deloitte (the Procedures were circulated on 10 February and are also available here: http://trademark-clearinghouse.com/dispute).

Thanks and cheers
Mary


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170222/435f0ad9/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list