[gnso-rpm-wg] Largest URS Filing/Decision in History

jonathan matkowsky jonathan.matkowsky at riskiq.net
Tue Jan 3 19:16:46 UTC 2017


I totally agree. The blog post was interesting read, but really is a
distraction from the issues.


<http://riskiq.com/>



*jonathan matkowsky*,

vp – ip & brand security

usa:: 1.347.467.1193 | office:: +972-(0)8-926-2766

emergency mobile:: +972-(0)54-924-0831

company reg. no. 514805332
<http://havarot.justice.gov.il/CompaniesDetails.aspx?id=514805332>

11/1 nachal chever, modiin israel

<https://twitter.com/riskiq>
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/RiskIQ/555939994512820>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/riskiq_2>
<https://plus.google.com/+Riskiq/posts>



On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:12 PM, <trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com> wrote:

> I don't see how it signifies anything - it's just one decision.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Marc H.Trachtenberg
> Shareholder
> Greenberg Traurig, LLP
> 77 West Wacker Drive
> Chicago, IL 60601
> Office (312) 456-1020
> Mobile (773) 677-3305
>
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Reg Levy <reg at mmx.co<mailto:reg at mmx.co>>
> wrote:
>
> My point was that a matter was successfully brought under the RPMs (my
> point would stand for matters unsuccessfully brought under the RPMs). That
> cybersquatting exists is not in dispute. Nor is it our—or ICANN’s—job to
> cause cybersquatting to no longer exist. The matter was a URS, which was a
> new-to-new-gTLDs RPM and (supposedly) cheaper than the UDRP.
>
> If this does not signify that RPMs work, does it signify that they do not?
>
>
> Reg Levy
> VP Compliance + Policy | Minds + Machines Group Limited
> C: +1-310-963-7135
> S: RegLevy2
>
> Current UTC offset: -8
>
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 10:30, Kiran Malancharuvil via gnso-rpm-wg <
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>> wrote:
>
> Agree with Doug and Marc, I would be curious to understand the thinking
> further.
>
> Also, it will be interesting to see what happens to all of these names
> when the suspension period is over.
>
> K
>
> Kiran Malancharuvil
> Policy Counselor
> MarkMonitor
> 415-419-9138 (m)
>
> Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
>
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 10:27 AM, "trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com<mailto:
> trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com>" <trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com<mailto:
> trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com>> wrote:
>
> Agreed. How does one large URS filling indicate that the RPMs are working?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Marc H.Trachtenberg
> Shareholder
> Greenberg Traurig, LLP
> 77 West Wacker Drive
> Chicago, IL 60601
> Office (312) 456-1020
> Mobile (773) 677-3305
>
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 11:26 AM, Doug Isenberg <disenberg at gigalawfirm.com<
> mailto:disenberg at gigalawfirm.com><mailto:disenberg at gigalawfirm.com>>
> wrote:
>
> As the author of the blog post that Phil shared, I disagree with Reg’s
> conclusion below (and am quite unsure how that conclusion was reached).
> This URS case is interesting because its size makes it unusual (and,
> indeed, unprecedented).  It is not indicative of any trend about RPMs in
> general or the URS in particular.  If anything, it is a reminder that there
> are many domain name registrants – even in the new gTLDs –  who continue to
> engage in cybersquatting on a large-scale, despite the RPMs such as the URS.
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Douglas M. Isenberg
> Attorney at Law
>
> <image001.png><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/
> url?u=http-3A__www.gigalaw.com_&d=DgMFAg&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=
> L7MB7eHT-UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzCxm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_
> 2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-JCWKmwk&s=ZlOXy68aDw9dtyJO-
> ShgSeFTgT5qjSffEUGc14ZQL78&e=>
>
> “When your brand is on the line, The GigaLaw Firm protects your brand
> online.” Learn more: www.GigaLaw.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/
> url?u=http-3A__www.GigaLaw.com&d=DgIF-g&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=
> DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=
> CTLGIhJ83DFc6xFM2gjwpScj1Pgsn_sfFjSBMiOCd1U&s=
> 2EuoR5I7h2Xn6TFKTv9MuhDFQ3usqxsVL-6CMVpyfbc&e= ><https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.gigalaw.com_&d=DgMFAg&
> c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=L7MB7eHT-UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzC
> xm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-JCWKmwk&s=ZlOXy68aDw9dtyJO-
> ShgSeFTgT5qjSffEUGc14ZQL78&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org
> ><mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@
> icann.org] On Behalf Of Reg Levy
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:56 PM
> To: Philip S. Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com><mailto:
> psc at vlaw-dc.com>>
> Cc: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org><mailto:g
> nso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Largest URS Filing/Decision in History
>
> Which seems to indicate that the current RPMs are working.
>
> Reg Levy
> VP Compliance + Policy | Minds + Machines Group Limited
> C: +1-310-963-7135
> S: RegLevy2
>
> Current UTC offset: -8
>
> On 3 Jan 2017, at 09:34, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@
> vlaw-dc.com><mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>> wrote:
>
> FYI, on December 21, 2016 NAF suspended 474 DN variants of Ashley
> Furniture in a single URS filing.
>
> For more background see https://urldefense.proofpoint.
> com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.circleid.com_posts_20161223-
> 5Fheres-5Fthe-5Flargest-5Furs-5Fcomplaint-5Fever-5Ffiled_&d=
> DgIF-g&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-
> tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=fgHeIuw69VHEcmbXFEVpbqoiy5s_C2pOj08v08OjTa0&s=
> uuBJPL7S7Bq1LLxnQi6-hMVaLBUGbWfLWbzUWaGowVI&e= <https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.circleid.com_posts_
> 20161223-5Fheres-5Fthe-5Flargest-5Furs-5Fcomplaint-
> 5Fever-5Ffiled_&d=DgMFAg&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=L7MB7eHT-
> UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzCxm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-
> JCWKmwk&s=OUHplwLUfg3180ijgGiEmvhZ4gztm1YhH13LqLUt1OI&e=> and
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.
> adrforum.com_domaindecisions_1703352D.htm&d=DgIF-g&c=
> 2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=
> fgHeIuw69VHEcmbXFEVpbqoiy5s_C2pOj08v08OjTa0&s=
> lkCdLadNciOafHsJ9pa4VDWScSKJ4CCUZKajVKxxecI&e= <https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adrforum.com_
> domaindecisions_1703352D.htm&d=DgMFAg&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=L7MB7eHT-
> UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzCxm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-
> JCWKmwk&s=6C7KqyrV7UIBNaA7RqhQeA-ApSbBAsjisDW_czuUCqk&e=>
>
> Best regards, Philip
>
>
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
> Virtualaw LLC
> 1155 F Street, NW
> Suite 1050
> Washington, DC 20004
> 202-559-8597/Direct
> 202-559-8750/Fax
> 202-255-6172/Cell
>
> Twitter: @VlawDC
>
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>
> ________________________________
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/
> url?u=http-3A__www.avg.com&d=DgIF-g&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=
> DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=
> CTLGIhJ83DFc6xFM2gjwpScj1Pgsn_sfFjSBMiOCd1U&s=C63MXdBt_K8Fa9WBaWkBP18-
> jViVNJ0I44HimAc_21I&e= ><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
> 3A__www.avg.com_&d=DgMFAg&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=L7MB7eHT-
> UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzCxm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-
> JCWKmwk&s=DcyREXZNRu3J24MyaCAlQv0DTP01AeO46btFz4QITVk&e=>
> Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4739/13633 - Release Date: 12/22/16
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org><mailto:g
> nso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.
> icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drpm-2Dwg&d=DgIF-g&c=
> 2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=
> fgHeIuw69VHEcmbXFEVpbqoiy5s_C2pOj08v08OjTa0&s=Nr-ty83kRt8QQyQqG_
> g1bxNkZq0m9gsx7nnu3T9nDYw&e= <https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_
> listinfo_gnso-2Drpm-2Dwg&d=DgMFAg&c=2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=L7MB7eHT-
> UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzCxm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-
> JCWKmwk&s=ACWaH_t-BoxZE1k7HpXoBCt5EeY6VNY0hDlTKLCW0VY&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org><mailto:g
> nso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.
> icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drpm-2Dwg&d=DgICAg&c=
> 2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=L7MB7eHT-UoCXD4iA3c7Sm3JrKXt7T1dG3NjBzC
> xm1c&m=FcC38yjcXr_2gTxPkyIdg59xM2MWYuKpsUT-JCWKmwk&s=ACWaH_t-
> BoxZE1k7HpXoBCt5EeY6VNY0hDlTKLCW0VY&e=
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged
> information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at
> postmaster at gtlaw.com<mailto:postmaster at gtlaw.com>, and do not use or
> disseminate such information.
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.
> icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drpm-2Dwg&d=DgIF-g&c=
> 2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=
> CTLGIhJ83DFc6xFM2gjwpScj1Pgsn_sfFjSBMiOCd1U&s=
> 3WEdhXLoXeXnxby5pC3bko8NWOIaXQzoFgVrM4hGSlI&e=
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.
> icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Drpm-2Dwg&d=DgIF-g&c=
> 2s2mvbfY0UoSKkl6_Ol9wg&r=DbXb5NzRlFfySrpYFo5BVAT-tqlUAlOQnabB-JqgRYk&m=
> CTLGIhJ83DFc6xFM2gjwpScj1Pgsn_sfFjSBMiOCd1U&s=
> 3WEdhXLoXeXnxby5pC3bko8NWOIaXQzoFgVrM4hGSlI&e=
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170103/2820be84/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list