[gnso-rpm-wg] PLEASE CONSIDER A REPLY: Proposed Working Group call next week

[J. Scott Evans]

I am fine cancelling the meeting. I want to make sure that we are
equitable to all. If we cannot get a critical mass, we should cancel.

J. Scott Evans | Associate General Counsel - Trademarks, Copyright,
Domains & Marketing |
Adobe 
345 Park Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110
408.536.5336 (tel), 408.709.6162 (cell)
jsevans at adobe.com
www.adobe.com








On 1/18/17, 4:50 PM, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of George
Kirikos" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of icann at leap.com> wrote:

>During today's call, some folks felt that the call scheduled for next
>week should still be held, despite some folks being unable due to
>their attendance at the large NamesCon event, as "there are always
>some folks who can't make it." However, I'd like to remind people that
>back in May 2016 we cancelled a working group call due to INTA having
>their Orlando meeting:
>
>http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-May/000291.html
>
>So, it would only be fair, in my opinion, that next week's call be
>cancelled. [the conflict doesn't affect me personally, by the way; I
>can make it next week]
>
>If it's not cancelled, then the next time there's a conflict with an
>INTA meeting, we should not change our own schedule to accommodate
>those going to INTA events.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>George Kirikos
>416-588-0269
>http://www.leap.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:
>> I will also be at NamesCon.
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On 18 Jan 2017, at 21:23, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Members,
>>
>>
>>
>> Those Members who were present at the Working Group meeting held earlier
>> today agreed to go ahead with the meeting scheduled for next Wednesday.
>>In
>> view, however, of the fact that quite a few Members will be traveling to
>> NamesCon at that time, coupled with its being the first meeting time
>>that is
>> rotating to 0400 UTC, it will be helpful if we can get a sense of how
>>many
>> Members will not be able to attend the meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> As such, please take a moment to reply to me if you know you will NOT
>>be on
>> the call next Wednesday at 0400 UTC ­ note that there¹s no need to
>>Reply All
>> or reply at all if you plan to be on the call.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Mary
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>_______________________________________________
>gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg