[gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from GNSO Review of all RPMs for all gTLDs PDP Working Group Meeting at ICANN 59 in Johannesburg

[Amr Elsadr]

Dear Working Group Members,

Below are the action items from the WG’s face-to-face meeting on 29 June in Johannesburg. The action items, notes, AC room recording, transcripts and documents used in the meeting are posted on the meeting wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/qwffAw.

You will find the majority of comments made during the meeting have been captured in the notes, and those that need to be incorporated into the next iteration of a working document of refined Charter questions, will be done by staff. This will be subject to review by the WG members. However, in some cases, Mary and I may be following up individually with participants from the meeting in Johannesburg (particularly those who are not members of the working group) to be sure that all comments have been accurately captured.

Thanks.

Amr


Action Items:


  1.  Action Items for Staff:
     *   Add bullet in preamble of Sunrise questions: Have abuses of the Sunrise period been documented by registries and registrars?
     *   Staff to add suggestions on refinements to questions to the latest version of the Sunrise Registrations and Trademark Claims questions – to be reviewed by the Working Group members
     *   Staff to compile all questions asked in Adobe Connect chat, and forward to the Working Group mailing list
  2.  Action Items for WG Members:
     *   Question 2 of Sunrise questions: Working Group members to review and suggest rewording of the threshold question
     *   Question 9 of Sunrise questions to be reworded to provide more clarity on its purpose (Suggested rewording: Should the scope of Sunrise Registrations be limited to the categories of goods and services for which the trademark is actually registered and put in the Clearinghouse?)
     *   Standard pricing at general availability should be defined by the WG, possibly as a baseline to compare Premium Pricing to
     *   On Trademark Claims Question 4:
                                                  i.      Maxim Alzoba to send his comments to the working group mailing list, especially where it relates to the data collection suggestions made by the Sub Team
                                                ii.      Kurt Pritz to send proposed language on initial question to make it more balanced


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170707/339deae6/attachment.html>