[gnso-rpm-wg] Availability of Court for Domain Name owners challenging a URS decision -- false assumption?

[George Kirikos]

Just a quick followup. In the web archives for the email I just sent
to the mailing list, responding to Claudio,

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-November/002591.html

two of the paragraphs that I wrote:

> From the perspective of a TM holder, the domain name registrant is an
> alleged cybersquatter. From the perspective of a domain name
> registrant, the TM holder is an alleged reverse domain name hijacker.
>
> From the perspective of ICANN and the law, the matter is in dispute
> and undecided. De novo review of the UDRP decision is being sought, to
> have the case decided ***on the merits*** in the national courts. All
> past determinations don't matter....that's the essence of "de novo".

are prefaced with a ">" symbol, making it look as if I was quoting Claudio.

Those two paragraphs are my own words, not Claudio's. I'm looking at
exactly what I wrote, on my screen, and those 2 symbols do not appear
in my original email! I took a screenshot, and it's attached.

Very weird. Something might be broken in how our emails are being
parsed when they're being converted to appear on the ICANN web
archive.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: icann-archives-adding-quotes-mysteriously.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 61948 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20171120/40bcf129/icann-archives-adding-quotes-mysteriously-0001.gif>