[gnso-rpm-wg] [Ext] RE: URS Charter Question Table/Draft Agenda for 30 November Call

BECKHAM, Brian brian.beckham at wipo.int
Wed Nov 29 17:57:23 UTC 2017


Thanks very much Julie,

The WG knows this is no small task for you guys on the staff side.

We really appreciate your work, and will keep an eye out for the next version.

Brian

From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:57 PM
To: Susan Payne; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] [Ext] RE: URS Charter Question Table/Draft Agenda for 30 November Call

Hi Susan,

Thanks so much for your request to allow 2 Working Group meetings to finalize the table and staff has noted it, as well as that it was also requested by Brian.  In addition, staff notes the request to circulate the updated table as quickly as possible, with amble time for the WG members to review before next week’s call.

Kind regards,
Julie

From: Susan Payne <susan.payne at valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne at valideus.com>>
Date: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 at 10:02 AM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [gnso-rpm-wg] URS Charter Question Table/Draft Agenda for 30 November Call

All
Thanks to Julie and the other staff members for producing and circulating this new table for the charter questions.

I would like to reiterate and support the comments Brian Beckham made last week (21 November).  Like Brian, I will not be able to join the call this week since the “Asia-friendly” rotation is not at all Europe-friendly.  This charter question table, which has only just been circulated, captures various comment and discussion but generally has not reached the point where it could be considered to be suggested refinement text for the charter question.  So, based on the comment which has been captured, further work is clearly required to turn this into suggested refinement text that the WG can agree on.  Given the timing, we have not been able to advance this over email before the call, and I would like to repeat Brian’s request that in the circumstances we allow at least 2 working group calls to finalise this charter text.

It would also be extremely helpful, for those of us not on the call, if any proposed text that the group does coalesce around could please be circulated in an updated version of the table as soon as possible after the call.  This will allow work to progress on the list prior to next week’s call.

Many thanks


Susan Payne
Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd
28-30 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom

E: susan.payne at valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne at valideus.com>
D: +44 20 7421 8255
T: +44 20 7421 8299
M: +44 7971 661175


From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 28 November 2017 22:12
To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] URS Charter Question Table/Draft Agenda for 30 November Call

Dear all,

Per the action item below from the Working Group for staff from the call held on 15 November, please see the attached table for your review and discussion during our call on Thursday, 30 November (29 November for some time zones).

Action Item:  Staff will create a table with columns for the questions; proposed edits/comments/clarifications; provide context; new questions.  Add a reference to the relevant section of the URS and link to the URS.  For example:

  *   Column 1 is Original Charter Questions (the grouping as in the ICANN60 slides can provide a useful categorization to break up the table meaningfully);
  *   Column 2 can be Suggestions for Refinement;
  *   Column 3 can be Context/Additional Background (or similar); and
  *   Column 4 Data Collection Suggestions.

In addition, please see below the draft agenda for the call:

Draft Agenda:
1. Roll call/updates to SOI
2. Review of the table of the charter questions, including the feedback from ICANN60, subsequent feedback, and proposed new questions
3. Next steps/next meeting

Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20171129/b1c45686/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rpm-wg mailing list